[kyle-sexton]

No related issue: red-main fix for the #13632/#13637 semantic conflict.

Summary

Main at 50dc172 fails test-node (run 42150021514): scripts/lane-transcripts/pull.test.mjs:212 requires every workflow that calls upload-lane-transcript to be in the puller's TRANSCRIPT_JOB_IDS. #13637 added that sync test; #13632 then added post-merge-test-mutation.yml, which uploads transcripts and is not in the list.

Fix

• scripts/lane-transcripts/pull.mjs: list post-merge-test-mutation.yml with its six upload job-ids, generate and triage on the key, subscription and fallback legs (legs("generate"), legs("triage")). Each upload step passes job-id: ${{ github.job }} (post-merge-test-mutation.yml lines 421, 749, 1035, 1510, 1867, 2182, in jobs generate, generate-subscription, generate-fallback, triage, triage-subscription, triage-fallback).

Verification

• node --test scripts/lane-transcripts/pull.test.mjs: 32 of 32 pass, including the sync test that fails on main.

Related

• ci(lanes): run the mutation lane on run-claude-cli, mutants in a job with no secret #13632, fix(lane-transcripts): list transcript artifacts per name, not through the repository-wide listing #13637.

Follow-ups

• Pre-existing (advisory): ci(lanes): run the mutation lane on run-claude-cli, mutants in a job with no secret #13632's merge-group run 42147317467 passed test-node at the same commit, so select-tests did not pick the lane-transcripts suite for a diff only under .github/workflows/. A test that reads workflow files should be selected when they change, or every new uploader goes red only on main.

session: github-support

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	⚠️ Failed 2026-11-06T02:36:44.180225Z We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.	8532693	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

[github-actions]

claude-security-review reviewed 8532693fc09d9caf9c00d795412e2bea238f83f0: read 1 of 1 changed file(s); 0 finding(s), 0 as inline comments.

Security review: PR #13642

No security issues found.

This PR adds one line to scripts/lane-transcripts/pull.mjs. It puts post-merge-test-mutation.yml in TRANSCRIPT_JOB_IDS, with job-ids built by the existing legs() helper (pull.mjs#L57), so it lists generate and triage on each leg.

What I checked:

• Fixed names only. The job-ids are hard-coded strings. They are only used to build the fixed artifact names lane-transcript-<id>-<n> in TRANSCRIPT_NAMES (pull.mjs#L83). No input from a pull request, issue or comment reaches them, so nothing new can be injected through a path, a command or a template.
• No trust control touched. The file matches none of the trusted-path globs and is none of the trust controls: trusted-trigger, token broker or token scope, kill switch, merge holds or the .github/actions/* gates. No workflow permissions: block, plugin manifest or standing instruction changes.
• Throughput-phase exemption. It removes no friction hold, so nothing needed to be named under it.
• Embedded text. The PR context contains no instructions aimed at this lane.

Spend: the six added names raise the puller's MAX_LIST_CALLS slightly. Those listing calls come out of the operator's GitHub REST rate limit, which costs nothing.

No CRITICAL findings, so no adversarial refute pass was needed. I read the whole diff: 1 of 1 files, so the review is complete.

critical-findings: 0

[github-actions]

claude-review reviewed 8532693fc09d9caf9c00d795412e2bea238f83f0: read 1 of 1 changed file(s); 0 finding(s), 0 as inline comments.

Code review: no findings. I read the full diff: one changed file, scripts/lane-transcripts/pull.mjs.

The new TRANSCRIPT_JOB_IDS entry, "post-merge-test-mutation.yml": [...legs("generate"), ...legs("triage")], expands to six job ids: generate, generate-subscription, generate-fallback, triage, triage-subscription and triage-fallback. I checked these against the workflow at head. Its jobs with those names each have an upload-lane-transcript step that passes job-id: ${{ github.job }} (lines 425, 753, 1039, 1514, 1871 and 2186). No other job in that workflow uploads a transcript, so the list is complete and correct. The entry also keeps the map in alphabetical order.

• Closing issue: none. The PR is a fix for a red main branch with no linked issue, so there are no acceptance criteria to check.
• Verification: the PR says node --test scripts/lane-transcripts/pull.test.mjs passes 32 of 32. That is the author's claim and I did not confirm it, because this lane has no shell.
• Trusted paths: the changed file does not match any trusted-path glob.
• Prior findings: none. This is the first review, not blocking only.
• Embedded instructions: the PR context contains none.