Skip to content

Update to topic qualimap - #12625

Open
LouisLeNezet wants to merge 11 commits into
nf-core:masterfrom
LouisLeNezet:qualimap
Open

Update to topic qualimap#12625
LouisLeNezet wants to merge 11 commits into
nf-core:masterfrom
LouisLeNezet:qualimap

Conversation

@LouisLeNezet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR checklist

Closes #12622

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the module conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, include test data in your PR.
  • Remove all TODO statements.
  • Broadcast software version numbers to topic: versions - See version_topics
  • Follow the naming conventions.
  • Follow the parameters requirements.
  • Follow the input/output options guidelines.
  • Add a resource label
  • Use BioConda and BioContainers if possible to fulfil software requirements.
  • Ensure that the test works with either Docker / Singularity. Conda CI tests can be quite flaky:
    • For modules:
      • nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile docker
      • nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile singularity
      • nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile conda
    • For subworkflows:
      • nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile docker
      • nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile singularity
      • nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile conda

@LouisLeNezet LouisLeNezet self-assigned this Aug 7, 2026
Comment on lines -27 to -32
def strandedness = 'non-strand-specific'
if (meta.strandedness == 'forward') {
strandedness = 'strand-specific-forward'
} else if (meta.strandedness == 'reverse') {
strandedness = 'strand-specific-reverse'
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really like breaking the existing code like this, by just ignoring the strandedness entirely.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My reasoning is that it is an optional argument for these tools (non-strand-specific as default).
As such, shouldn't it be passed through ext.args ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, in theory ;)
Personally I think meta.strandedness should still be allowed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, I will put it back then !

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, it isn't allowed by the linter at the moment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, now I remember why I deleted it 😕
What's the recommended course of action ?
Should we move it to a separate value channel ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Migrate to topic qualimap/bamqccram

2 participants