chore: name @RustyLegend as maintainer

.github/CODEOWNERS

@@ -1,18 +1,31 @@
-# Maintainers for open-source-launchpad.
+# Who reviews what.
 #
-# Anyone listed here is automatically requested for review when a matching file
-# changes. This is what gives the 48-hour review promise an actual owner.
+# GitHub requests a review from these people automatically when a pull request
+# touches a path they own. Code-owner review is REQUIRED on this repository, so
+# one of the names on the matching line has to approve before anything merges.
 #
-# A handle only works if that person has write access AND has accepted the
-# invitation. Check Settings → Collaborators.
+# Maintainer for the HTML and CSS site: @RustyLegend
+#
+# @pushpam2404 is on every line on purpose:
+#   - GitHub does not let anybody approve their own pull request, so a line
+#     naming one person would deadlock the moment that person opened one
+#   - if the maintainer is unavailable, nothing has to wait for them
+#
+# The last matching line wins, so the more specific rules are at the bottom.
 
 # Everything, by default
-*                       @pushpam2404 @RustyLegend @Vedant-OGC @Prashansure
+*                       @RustyLegend @pushpam2404
 
-# CI and contribution policy
+# The site, and the contributor wall that rebuilds itself on merge
+/css/                   @RustyLegend @pushpam2404
+/js/                    @RustyLegend @pushpam2404
+/contributors/          @RustyLegend @pushpam2404
+
+# Automation and the contribution rules. These decide what the checks are, so a
+# pull request must not be able to change them with only its own author's
+# approval.
 /.github/               @pushpam2404
 /CONTRIBUTING.md        @pushpam2404
 /CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md     @pushpam2404
-
-# The contributor wall — high volume, low risk, good for a newer maintainer
-/contributors/          @pushpam2404 @RustyLegend @Vedant-OGC @Prashansure
+/SECURITY.md            @pushpam2404
+/LICENSE                @pushpam2404