Skip to content

bump for 6.1.1#687

Open
lopezt-unity wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
publication/rc-6.1.1
Open

bump for 6.1.1#687
lopezt-unity wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
publication/rc-6.1.1

Conversation

@lopezt-unity

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Purpose of this PR

Bumping to 6.1.1 for publication

Links

Jira:

Comments to Reviewers

[List known issues, planned work, provide any extra context for your code.]

@u-pr u-pr Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect

A straightforward version bump for publication.

🤖 Helpful? 👍/👎

@modrimkus-unity modrimkus-unity left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@codecov-github-com

codecov-github-com Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #687      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   38.43%   38.50%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         279      279              
  Lines       39164    39161       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits        15052    15077      +25     
+ Misses      24112    24084      -28     
Flag Coverage Δ
probuilder_MacOS_6000.0 36.21% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️
probuilder_MacOS_6000.3 36.21% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️
probuilder_MacOS_6000.4 36.20% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️
probuilder_MacOS_6000.5 36.21% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

ℹ️ Need help interpreting these results?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants