Skip to content

Support scoped quota data and consistent usage status - #18

Open
TheBeems wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sprint-1-reliable-usage
Open

Support scoped quota data and consistent usage status#18
TheBeems wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sprint-1-reliable-usage

Conversation

@TheBeems

@TheBeems TheBeems commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Modern Codex quota categories and unusual window durations were ignored, and refresh failures could replace confirmed account data with unrelated local observations. This sprint preserves separate quota categories, retains the last confirmed measurement with its original age, and isolates persistent history by account and default category. Unidentified observations stay in memory; old unscoped history is not imported.

The Dock, dashboard, and forecasts now share one freshness policy. Stale forecasts pause while observed history remains visible. A safe diagnostics page distinguishes missing reset fields from an explicit zero and reports the running build separately from Store rollout. Account and chart data are captured atomically for rendering.

Validation: 186 native ARM64 tests passed; x64 and ARM64 Debug application builds passed without warnings. Existing test-name analyzer warnings are unchanged. Both integration preflights passed static manifest/COM/assets/runtime checks, but package registration and AppExtension discovery were unavailable in this test context. Interactive Dock/clipboard rendering and real-account behavior still require the documented isolated integration check; no package was installed and no reset was consumed. PR CI supplies the x64 test and Store-package checks.

Sprint 1 of the implementation series in SPRINTS.md. Related to #16; this adds diagnostic evidence and does not claim the original user's reset issue has been reproduced or resolved.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-09-09T16:56:03.725540Z 2f16339 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant