Skip to content

Add quota history, workday planning, and explicit account actions - #20

Open
TheBeems wants to merge 3 commits into
codex/sprint-2-attention-controlsfrom
codex/sprint-3-history-planning
Open

Add quota history, workday planning, and explicit account actions#20
TheBeems wants to merge 3 commits into
codex/sprint-2-attention-controlsfrom
codex/sprint-3-history-planning

Conversation

@TheBeems

@TheBeems TheBeems commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Usage monitoring can now retain 7/30/90 days of account/category-scoped quota observations and explicitly export CSV or JSON. The workday planner budgets allowance across the user's remaining days/hours and explains the continuous measurement segment plus a held-out latest-observation check.

Compatible Codex versions can return task-level usage estimates. Task requests are serialized and only the latest requested task is presented. Earned resets require explicit confirmation, a verified account, and a request ID saved before sending; ambiguous outcomes retain the exact ID across retries and restarts. No actual reset was redeemed during development.

Validation: 314 native ARM64 tests passed; both x64 and ARM64 application builds passed without warnings. The 22 action regressions also passed after the final analyzer-only test edit. Integration preflights passed source/generated registration, identity, assets, and runtime checks. The installed ARM64 Store package is healthy/discoverable but does not run these Debug builds; live forms, confirmations, exports, and real-account compatibility remain unverified. GitHub Actions passed on head ebe7efe: all 314 x64 tests, x64/ARM64 builds, and Store-package validation. Evidence: https://github.com/TheBeems/CodexUsageDock/actions/runs/34385299160

Depends on #19, following #18. This PR targets the preceding feature branch to keep its diff limited to sprint 3; merge in order and retarget to main.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-09T17:55:03.771109Z 1ee38a9 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1ee38a90a2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread CodexUsageDock/UsagePlanning.cs Outdated
Comment thread CHANGELOG.md Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant