Skip to content

chg: add reciprocal ownership and manufacturing relationships #527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
adulau merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2026
Merged

chg: add reciprocal ownership and manufacturing relationships #527

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
59 changes: 52 additions & 7 deletions relationships/definition.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -712,9 +712,11 @@
{
"description": "This relationship describes an object which is an operator of another object.",
"format": [
"cert-eu"
"cert-eu",
"misp"
],
"name": "operator-of"
"name": "operator-of",
"opposite": "operated-by"
},
{
"description": "This relationship describes an object which overlaps another object.",
Expand All @@ -727,9 +729,11 @@
"description": "This relationship describes an object which owns another object.",
"format": [
"cert-eu",
"alfred"
"alfred",
"misp"
],
"name": "owner-of"
"name": "owner-of",
"opposite": "owned-by"
},
{
"description": "This relationship describes an object which publishes method for another object.",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -785,7 +789,8 @@
"format": [
"misp"
],
"name": "controls"
"name": "controls",
"opposite": "controlled-by"
},
{
"description": "This relationships describes an object which annotates another object.",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2373,7 +2378,47 @@
],
"name": "inspects",
"opposite": "inspected-by"
},
{
"description": "This relationship describes an object which is operated by another object.",
"format": [
"misp"
],
"name": "operated-by",
"opposite": "operator-of"
},
{
"description": "This relationship describes an object which is owned by another object.",
"format": [
"misp"
],
"name": "owned-by",
"opposite": "owner-of"
},
{
"description": "This relationship describes an object which is controlled by another object.",
"format": [
"misp"
],
"name": "controlled-by",
"opposite": "controls"
},
{
"description": "This relationship describes an object which manufactures another object.",
"format": [
"misp"
],
"name": "manufactures",
"opposite": "manufactured-by"
},
{
"description": "This relationship describes an object which is manufactured by another object.",
"format": [
"misp"
],
"name": "manufactured-by",
"opposite": "manufactures"
}
],
"version": 52
}
"version": 53
}

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Match the formatter's no-newline output

The newly added trailing newline makes this file noncanonical and causes every Travis run to fail: .travis.yml:16 invokes validate_all.sh, which formats the file and rejects any resulting diff at validate_all.sh:6-12, while jq_all_the_things.sh:26 uses jq -S -j; jq --help defines --join-output as producing output without a newline. Running that exact formatter removes this final LF, so validation exits before reaching the schema checks.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Loading