Skip to content

merge queue: checking #493 on main (a95db0e) - #557

Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/2338339d1c
Closed

merge queue: checking #493 on main (a95db0e)#557
mergify[bot] wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/2338339d1c

Conversation

@mergify

@mergify mergify Bot commented Sep 13, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 This pull request has been checked successfully and will be merged soon. 🎉

#493 is queued for merge on branch main (a95db0e).

This pull request has been created by Mergify to check the mergeability of #493.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue rule admin-bypass for merge:

  • check-success = lint
  • check-success = test
  • check-success = validate

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
checking_base_sha: a95db0ea1dad4e99a3054cff0f59ad9020c8391e
previous_check_retries: []
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 493
    scopes: []
scopes: []
...

Invoker Bot and others added 5 commits September 12, 2026 18:08
Invoker Bot
invoker: wf-1789236076827-17/implement-sweep-step5a-wiring — Rewrite …
ae160c2 
…the Step 5a passage to call the shipped probe.

Review claim: Step 5a names the probe and all three of its outcomes.
Review lane: behavior
Safety invariant: The blocked-pull-request policy in Step 5 is unchanged; only the passage describing how to test is rewritten.
Effectiveness measurement: A fixture asserts the Step 5a passage names the probe and all three outcomes, and that the words `rm -rf` no longer appear in it.
Slice rationale: One passage of one document, stacked on the step that ships the executable it names.
Architectural effect: The written procedure points at a shipped executable instead of an inline recipe.
Goal: Rewrite the Step 5a passage of product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md to call scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh and describe its three outcomes.
Motivation: The passage already told the reader to tear down with the safe teardown command, and that wording did not prevent an improvised removal that corrupted the next reading. Naming one executable removes the chance to improvise.
Alternative considerations: Adding another sentence of guidance was rejected, since equivalent guidance is already present and did not hold.
Implementation details: Replace the fenced passage in Step 5a with a call to scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh and a short list of its three outcomes. Add a fixture under the skill's tests folder asserting the passage names the probe, names all three outcomes, and no longer contains an improvised removal.
Non-goals: Does not change Step 5's policy for a blocked pull request, does not touch the merge passage, and does not edit any other written procedure.
Layer: domain
Feature state: active
Files: product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md, product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests/fires_step5a_names_probe.md
Change types:
- product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md: docs-only
- product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests/fires_step5a_names_probe.md: create
Acceptance criteria:
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests -v` exits 0.
- The Step 5a passage names scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh.
- The Step 5a passage lists all three outcomes.

Solution:
  Rewrite the Step 5a passage to call the shipped probe.
Review claim: Step 5a names the probe and all three of its outcomes.
Review lane: behavior
Safety invariant: The blocked-pull-request policy in Step 5 is unchanged; only the passage describing how to test is rewritten.
Effectiveness measurement: A fixture asserts the Step 5a passage names the probe and all three outcomes, and that the words `rm -rf` no longer appear in it.
Slice rationale: One passage of one document, stacked on the step that ships the executable it names.
Architectural effect: The written procedure points at a shipped executable instead of an inline recipe.
Goal: Rewrite the Step 5a passage of product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md to call scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh and describe its three outcomes.
Motivation: The passage already told the reader to tear down with the safe teardown command, and that wording did not prevent an improvised removal that corrupted the next reading. Naming one executable removes the chance to improvise.
Alternative considerations: Adding another sentence of guidance was rejected, since equivalent guidance is already present and did not hold.
Implementation details: Replace the fenced passage in Step 5a with a call to scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh and a short list of its three outcomes. Add a fixture under the skill's tests folder asserting the passage names the probe, names all three outcomes, and no longer contains an improvised removal.
Non-goals: Does not change Step 5's policy for a blocked pull request, does not touch the merge passage, and does not edit any other written procedure.
Layer: domain
Feature state: active
Files: product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md, product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests/fires_step5a_names_probe.md
Change types:
- product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md: docs-only
- product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests/fires_step5a_names_probe.md: create
Acceptance criteria:
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests -v` exits 0.
- The Step 5a passage names scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh.
- The Step 5a passage lists all three outcomes.

Invoker-Finalize-Id: e859b330-f6c2-4da7-9aaf-2356607f423a
Invoker Bot
invoker: wf-1789236076827-17/verify-sweep-step5a-wiring — Run the det…
01d01bc 
…erministic proof for the Step 5a wiring.

Review claim: A fixture asserts the passage names the probe.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Proof-only; adds no product behavior.
Effectiveness measurement: The suite fails if the passage stops naming the probe or drops an outcome.
Slice rationale: One proof slice for this step.
Architectural effect: None; verification only.
Goal: Prove the Step 5a wiring deterministically.
Motivation: The change is to one written passage, so the proof reads that passage.
Alternative considerations: Manual verification was rejected as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Execute the command below as the terminal proof.
Non-goals: No product edits here; proof only.
Layer: app_regression
Feature state: active

Exit code: 0
Invoker-Finalize-Id: 3aa932b8-5cc2-4fba-bc5c-115d7a475b4f
Invoker Bot
invoker: wf-1789236076827-17/scrub-handoff-artifacts — Terminal check…
05c285d 
… that no ephemeral inter-task handoff files remain.

Review claim: The workflow leaves no scratch handoff artifacts behind.
Review lane: cleanup
Safety invariant: Read-only; never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work.
Effectiveness measurement: The gate fails when a plans/invoker-handoff.* or lens-*.json file is still present after the leaf tasks complete.
Slice rationale: One terminal hygiene gate for the workflow.
Architectural effect: None; check only.
Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files survive the run.
Motivation: Inter-task scratch files leak into diffs and read as part of the work.
Alternative considerations: Deleting them automatically was rejected; the gate reports, it does not mutate.
Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh without --apply.
Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits.
Layer: app_regression
Feature state: active

Exit code: 0
Invoker-Finalize-Id: 2c57922e-973b-4c94-a350-bde1591b77ee
@EdbertChan
Merge experiment/wf-1789236076827-17/scrub-handoff-artifacts/g0.t0.a-…
a6fa29f 
…acd04e326-8748be37 — Terminal check that no ephemeral inter-task handoff files remain.

Review claim: The workflow leaves no scratch handoff artifacts behind.
Review lane: cleanup
Safety invariant: Read-only; never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work.
Effectiveness measurement: The gate fails when a plans/invoker-handoff.* or lens-*.json file is still present after the leaf tasks complete.
Slice rationale: One terminal hygiene gate for the workflow.
Architectural effect: None; check only.
Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files survive the run.
Motivation: Inter-task scratch files leak into diffs and read as part of the work.
Alternative considerations: Deleting them automatically was rejected; the gate reports, it does not mutate.
Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh without --apply.
Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits.
Layer: app_regression
Feature state: active
@mergify
Merge of #493
2b434a2
@mergify mergify Bot mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2026
Merged
2 tasks
@mergify mergify Bot closed this Sep 13, 2026
@mergify
mergify Bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/2338339d1c branch September 13, 2026 18:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@EdbertChan