admin-bypass-sweep (1b) Step 5a calls the rebase probe - #493
Merged
mergify[bot] merged 4 commits intoSep 13, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…the Step 5a passage to call the shipped probe. Review claim: Step 5a names the probe and all three of its outcomes. Review lane: behavior Safety invariant: The blocked-pull-request policy in Step 5 is unchanged; only the passage describing how to test is rewritten. Effectiveness measurement: A fixture asserts the Step 5a passage names the probe and all three outcomes, and that the words `rm -rf` no longer appear in it. Slice rationale: One passage of one document, stacked on the step that ships the executable it names. Architectural effect: The written procedure points at a shipped executable instead of an inline recipe. Goal: Rewrite the Step 5a passage of product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md to call scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh and describe its three outcomes. Motivation: The passage already told the reader to tear down with the safe teardown command, and that wording did not prevent an improvised removal that corrupted the next reading. Naming one executable removes the chance to improvise. Alternative considerations: Adding another sentence of guidance was rejected, since equivalent guidance is already present and did not hold. Implementation details: Replace the fenced passage in Step 5a with a call to scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh and a short list of its three outcomes. Add a fixture under the skill's tests folder asserting the passage names the probe, names all three outcomes, and no longer contains an improvised removal. Non-goals: Does not change Step 5's policy for a blocked pull request, does not touch the merge passage, and does not edit any other written procedure. Layer: domain Feature state: active Files: product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md, product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests/fires_step5a_names_probe.md Change types: - product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md: docs-only - product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests/fires_step5a_names_probe.md: create Acceptance criteria: - `python3 -m unittest discover -s product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests -v` exits 0. - The Step 5a passage names scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh. - The Step 5a passage lists all three outcomes. Solution: Rewrite the Step 5a passage to call the shipped probe. Review claim: Step 5a names the probe and all three of its outcomes. Review lane: behavior Safety invariant: The blocked-pull-request policy in Step 5 is unchanged; only the passage describing how to test is rewritten. Effectiveness measurement: A fixture asserts the Step 5a passage names the probe and all three outcomes, and that the words `rm -rf` no longer appear in it. Slice rationale: One passage of one document, stacked on the step that ships the executable it names. Architectural effect: The written procedure points at a shipped executable instead of an inline recipe. Goal: Rewrite the Step 5a passage of product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md to call scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh and describe its three outcomes. Motivation: The passage already told the reader to tear down with the safe teardown command, and that wording did not prevent an improvised removal that corrupted the next reading. Naming one executable removes the chance to improvise. Alternative considerations: Adding another sentence of guidance was rejected, since equivalent guidance is already present and did not hold. Implementation details: Replace the fenced passage in Step 5a with a call to scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh and a short list of its three outcomes. Add a fixture under the skill's tests folder asserting the passage names the probe, names all three outcomes, and no longer contains an improvised removal. Non-goals: Does not change Step 5's policy for a blocked pull request, does not touch the merge passage, and does not edit any other written procedure. Layer: domain Feature state: active Files: product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md, product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests/fires_step5a_names_probe.md Change types: - product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/SKILL.md: docs-only - product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests/fires_step5a_names_probe.md: create Acceptance criteria: - `python3 -m unittest discover -s product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests -v` exits 0. - The Step 5a passage names scripts/probe_branch_rebase.sh. - The Step 5a passage lists all three outcomes. Invoker-Finalize-Id: e859b330-f6c2-4da7-9aaf-2356607f423a
…erministic proof for the Step 5a wiring. Review claim: A fixture asserts the passage names the probe. Review lane: proof Safety invariant: Proof-only; adds no product behavior. Effectiveness measurement: The suite fails if the passage stops naming the probe or drops an outcome. Slice rationale: One proof slice for this step. Architectural effect: None; verification only. Goal: Prove the Step 5a wiring deterministically. Motivation: The change is to one written passage, so the proof reads that passage. Alternative considerations: Manual verification was rejected as non-deterministic. Implementation details: Execute the command below as the terminal proof. Non-goals: No product edits here; proof only. Layer: app_regression Feature state: active Exit code: 0 Invoker-Finalize-Id: 3aa932b8-5cc2-4fba-bc5c-115d7a475b4f
… that no ephemeral inter-task handoff files remain. Review claim: The workflow leaves no scratch handoff artifacts behind. Review lane: cleanup Safety invariant: Read-only; never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work. Effectiveness measurement: The gate fails when a plans/invoker-handoff.* or lens-*.json file is still present after the leaf tasks complete. Slice rationale: One terminal hygiene gate for the workflow. Architectural effect: None; check only. Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files survive the run. Motivation: Inter-task scratch files leak into diffs and read as part of the work. Alternative considerations: Deleting them automatically was rejected; the gate reports, it does not mutate. Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh without --apply. Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits. Layer: app_regression Feature state: active Exit code: 0 Invoker-Finalize-Id: 2c57922e-973b-4c94-a350-bde1591b77ee
…acd04e326-8748be37 — Terminal check that no ephemeral inter-task handoff files remain. Review claim: The workflow leaves no scratch handoff artifacts behind. Review lane: cleanup Safety invariant: Read-only; never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work. Effectiveness measurement: The gate fails when a plans/invoker-handoff.* or lens-*.json file is still present after the leaf tasks complete. Slice rationale: One terminal hygiene gate for the workflow. Architectural effect: None; check only. Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files survive the run. Motivation: Inter-task scratch files leak into diffs and read as part of the work. Alternative considerations: Deleting them automatically was rejected; the gate reports, it does not mutate. Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh without --apply. Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits. Layer: app_regression Feature state: active
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: serverGenReqId_596a16d7-bbee-4de6-8a2f-7a3d47185a63) |
Contributor
|
Queued — the merge queue status continues in this comment ↓. |
EdbertChan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2026
…ody checker on PR #493's live body after the rewrite. Goal: Prove the body passes as published. Motivation: A PATCH that returned 200 is not proof the live body passes. Safety invariant: Read-only; a failed fetch fails the task instead of passing. Verify: exit code 0 and output PR body validation passed. Effectiveness measurement: The same checker the required GitHub check runs passes on the live body, so the PR is no longer blocked on its text. Exit code: 0
EdbertChan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2026
…ody checker on PR #493's live body after the rewrite. Goal: Prove the body passes as published. Motivation: A PATCH that returned 200 is not proof the live body passes. Safety invariant: Read-only; a failed fetch fails the task instead of passing. Verify: exit code 0 and output PR body validation passed. Effectiveness measurement: The same checker the required GitHub check runs passes on the live body, so the PR is no longer blocked on its text. Exit code: 0
Owner
Author
|
Mergify repair stopped: missing required check validate |
Owner
Author
|
@Mergifyio queue |
Contributor
Merge Queue Status
This pull request spent 7 minutes 17 seconds in the queue, including 5 minutes 58 seconds running CI. Required conditions to merge
|
This was referenced Sep 13, 2026
mergify
Bot
deleted the
plan/admin-bypass-sweep-1b-step-5a-calls-the-rebase-probe
branch
September 13, 2026 18:14
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This procedure helps operators decide whether a blocked pull request can safely move toward merging.
GitHub may report a conflict when a pull request is only out of date, delaying progress.
The old check used temporary workspaces and manual rebases, which added cleanup and unclear results.
The new check gives three clear outcomes while keeping the blocked-pull-request policy unchanged.
Review Claim
Replace the blocked-request check with one rebase check and explain its three outcomes without changing the blocked-pull-request policy.
Review Lane
behavior
Review Unit
product-skill
Safety Invariant
The blocked-pull-request policy in Step 5 is unchanged; only the passage describing how to test is rewritten.
Slice Rationale
This slice changes one passage and its focused contract test, stacked on the step that ships the executable it names.
Non-goals
Test Plan
Test Plan
python3 -m unittest discover -s product/skills/admin-bypass-sweep/tests -v—Ran 3 testsandOK.bash scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh—scrub-handoff-artifacts-ok.Revert Plan
Revert Plan
git revert <sha>.