Add openssl upgrade for security patch#22
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
WalkthroughAdded an Alpine package upgrade step ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
python-interpreter/Dockerfile (1)
38-39:⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 CriticalFix the apk command syntax (same issue as builder stage).
The
--no-cacheflag positioning is incorrect here as well.🔧 Proposed fix
# Patch CVE-2026-28390 -RUN apk upgrade --no-cache libcrypto3 libssl3 +RUN apk --no-cache upgrade libcrypto3 libssl3🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@python-interpreter/Dockerfile` around lines 38 - 39, The apk command in the CVE patch RUN step uses the flag after the subcommand; change it to place --no-cache immediately after apk (i.e., use apk --no-cache upgrade ...) so the no-cache option is applied correctly; update the RUN line under the "# Patch CVE-2026-28390" comment that currently starts with "RUN apk upgrade --no-cache libcrypto3 libssl3" to mirror the builder-stage fix.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
python-interpreter/Dockerfile (1)
4-5: Consider whether the builder stage needs the OpenSSL upgrade.Since the builder stage is only used to install Python dependencies and is discarded in the final image, the OpenSSL vulnerability may not be exploitable during the build process. If the build doesn't execute code that uses OpenSSL (e.g., HTTPS requests, cryptographic operations), this upgrade might be unnecessary in the builder stage.
However, if the build process does involve network operations or cryptographic tasks, keeping the upgrade is prudent.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@python-interpreter/Dockerfile` around lines 4 - 5, The Dockerfile currently runs "RUN apk upgrade --no-cache libcrypto3 libssl3" in the builder stage; decide whether the builder actually performs network/crypto operations during dependency installation—if not, remove that RUN from the builder and move it into the final image stage (or only run it in the final stage) so the upgrade applies to the runtime image, otherwise keep it in the builder; update the Dockerfile to ensure the upgrade is performed in the final stage (or both) by relocating or duplicating the "apk upgrade --no-cache libcrypto3 libssl3" command accordingly and documenting why it remains in the builder if you choose to keep it.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Duplicate comments:
In `@python-interpreter/Dockerfile`:
- Around line 38-39: The apk command in the CVE patch RUN step uses the flag
after the subcommand; change it to place --no-cache immediately after apk (i.e.,
use apk --no-cache upgrade ...) so the no-cache option is applied correctly;
update the RUN line under the "# Patch CVE-2026-28390" comment that currently
starts with "RUN apk upgrade --no-cache libcrypto3 libssl3" to mirror the
builder-stage fix.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@python-interpreter/Dockerfile`:
- Around line 4-5: The Dockerfile currently runs "RUN apk upgrade --no-cache
libcrypto3 libssl3" in the builder stage; decide whether the builder actually
performs network/crypto operations during dependency installation—if not, remove
that RUN from the builder and move it into the final image stage (or only run it
in the final stage) so the upgrade applies to the runtime image, otherwise keep
it in the builder; update the Dockerfile to ensure the upgrade is performed in
the final stage (or both) by relocating or duplicating the "apk upgrade
--no-cache libcrypto3 libssl3" command accordingly and documenting why it
remains in the builder if you choose to keep it.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 39ed6934-8e9e-4c30-bca5-dda3a80c8878
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
python-interpreter/Dockerfile
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the python-interpreter container build to mitigate reported OpenSSL-related vulnerabilities by upgrading Alpine SSL libraries during image build, as a temporary measure until the upstream Python base image resolves the findings.
Changes:
- Upgrade
libcrypto3andlibssl3in the builder stage. - Upgrade
libcrypto3andlibssl3in the final runtime stage.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| # Patch CVE-2026-28390 | ||
| RUN apk upgrade --no-cache libcrypto3 libssl3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The inline comment references a specific CVE, but the Dockerfile doesn’t document which fixed package versions are required; as repos change, this can become stale/misleading. Consider making the comment more general (e.g., “Upgrade OpenSSL libs for security fixes”) or include the tracking link/version expectation that justifies these packages.
| # Patch CVE-2026-28390 | ||
| RUN apk upgrade --no-cache libcrypto3 libssl3 | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The builder stage isn’t included in the final image of a multi-stage build, so upgrading libcrypto/libssl here won’t affect the runtime contents of the produced image. Consider removing this from the builder stage (or add a brief note explaining why the builder stage itself must be patched) to avoid extra build time and maintenance.
| # Patch CVE-2026-28390 | |
| RUN apk upgrade --no-cache libcrypto3 libssl3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Purpose
$subject
Temp fix till python base image fixes the vulnerabilities reported in the trivy scan.
Summary by CodeRabbit