Closed
Conversation
Member
|
@jaxwilko only change I think would be good here would be to store the hash separately, and still keep version to the branch name. |
Member
Author
|
@bennothommo i'm not particularly picky on how, just wanted to run the tests and didn't have a local dev set up. Reporting the hash separately or as addition indexes on the end of the array potentially, not sure what works best, just would be really nice to report hash changes when upgrading on a dev branch :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change allows the hash version to be reported along with the branch name.