Repository navigation
Improve resilient OCSP certificate revocation checker #140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
madislm
wants to merge
19
commits into
web-eid:v4
Choose a base branch
from
madislm:AUT-2981
base: v4
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
748d97a
Improve resilient OCSP certificate revocation checker
aarmam bfca472
Make requiring the Key Usage extension configurable
madislm e363507
Update UserCertificateOCSPException
madislm 88c3233
Update README
madislm 5f53933
Add OcspResponseValidator.validateKeyUsageOcspSigning
madislm f6e8b73
Fix validation order in AuthTokenValidatorImpl
madislm c791371
Remove an unnecessary comment
madislm acb3c2e
Update docs
madislm 023054d
Update docs
madislm f7759b5
Move the Certificate Signing Key Usage check
madislm 1080066
Update docs
madislm 288b5bc
Update docs
madislm 6b21e03
Fix validation order in OcspCertificateRevocationChecker
madislm 5b27b54
Add comment
madislm be3ca6c
Add comment
madislm 4789fd1
Update tests
madislm 9db998c
AUT-3295 Forbid configuring a fallback for an issuer that has a desig…
madislm 52920cd
AUT-3302 Add fallback on unknown status configuration option
aarmam 89eb3c8
AUT-3304 Accept OCSP certificate ID with NULL hash algorithm parameters
aarmam File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As with
ResilientOcspCertificateRevocationChecker, we should runcheckNonce()beforeverifyOcspResponse(), as checking the nonce first avoids unnecessary validation on a mismatch.As with
ResilientOcspCertificateRevocationChecker, I suggest to simply move verifyOcspResponse() below theif (ocspService.doesSupportNonce())block.