feat: add read_ranges to VortexReadAt - #9384
Performance Regression: -11.32%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1993 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 89 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=16384/indices=16] |
1 ms | 1.2 ms | -11.32% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ji/read-ranges (e8759c7) with develop (a272f51)
Footnotes
-
89 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩