[WIP] Bump Apache DF to 55 - #9334
Performance Regression: -0.27%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 4 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2030 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)] |
1 ms | 1.2 ms | -12.44% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compact[(4096, 90)] |
1.6 µs | 1.8 µs | -10.89% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compact_sliced[(4096, 90)] |
1.7 µs | 1.9 µs | -10.51% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compact[(16384, 90)] |
1.8 µs | 2 µs | -10.12% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | cold_misaligned[(64, 256)] |
5.3 ms | 4.4 ms | +20.1% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | map_each[BufferMut<i32>, 128] |
1,060.1 ns | 928.2 ns | +14.22% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | words_gather_scalar[65536] |
9.4 µs | 8.2 µs | +13.95% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing adamg/df-55 (7152f4c) with develop (15c73f3)
Footnotes
-
46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩