Array VTables Follow Up

[gatesn]

This PR follows #7215

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 21.85%

⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 9 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1109 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1530 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]	231.5 µs	179.9 µs	+28.69%
❌	Simulation	new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 2048]	64 µs	75.8 µs	-15.6%
❌	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]	138.8 µs	159.2 µs	-12.79%
❌	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]	109.6 µs	140.2 µs	-21.85%
❌	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 2048]	54.7 µs	65 µs	-15.88%
❌	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384]	93.1 µs	105.2 µs	-11.44%
⚡	Simulation	patched_take_10k_first_chunk_only	329.4 µs	273.9 µs	+20.23%
❌	Simulation	take_10k_random	192 µs	239.9 µs	-19.95%
❌	Simulation	take_10k_contiguous	269.8 µs	303.8 µs	-11.19%
⚡	Simulation	take_10_contiguous	28.7 µs	26 µs	+10.39%
⚡	Simulation	rebuild_naive	129.4 µs	117.2 µs	+10.43%
❌	Simulation	decompress_rd[f32, (10000, 0.1)]	82.5 µs	93.2 µs	-11.4%
❌	Simulation	decompress_rd[f32, (10000, 0.01)]	82.3 µs	93.2 µs	-11.63%

---

_{Comparing ngates/vtable-cleanup (af6da6d) with develop (02b0949)}

Footnotes

1. 1530 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩