Skip to content

[DO NOT MERGE][home] Adds vercel-com workflow visuals#1674

Draft
christopherkindl wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
ck/homepage-visuals
Draft

[DO NOT MERGE][home] Adds vercel-com workflow visuals#1674
christopherkindl wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
ck/homepage-visuals

Conversation

@christopherkindl
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@christopherkindl christopherkindl commented Apr 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Changes:

  • Adds vercel-com workflow visuals
  • Updates geistdocs.css with geist tokens (will be removed once layout facelift is merged)

To-Do's:

  • Harmonize new typography style in existing feature grids once

Preview: https://workflow-docs-git-ck-homepage-visuals.vercel.sh/

image image

@christopherkindl christopherkindl requested a review from a team as a code owner April 9, 2026 20:52
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 14c9c66

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel bot commented Apr 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Apr 10, 2026 8:52am
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 8:52am

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.058s (-7.3% 🟢) 1.009s (~) 0.951s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.060s (-9.8% 🟢) 1.011s (~) 0.951s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 0.219s (-9.5% 🟢) 2.145s (+1.0%) 1.926s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 0.290s (-34.6% 🟢) 2.266s (+1.9%) 1.975s 10 1.33x
▲ Vercel Nitro 0.290s (+2.8%) 2.086s (-16.0% 🟢) 1.795s 10 1.33x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.144s (-0.6%) 2.009s (~) 0.864s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.151s (+0.5%) 2.009s (~) 0.857s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.855s (-0.8%) 3.951s (+2.8%) 2.096s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 1.937s (-7.6% 🟢) 4.053s (+5.6% 🔺) 2.116s 10 1.04x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.023s (-2.3%) 3.694s (~) 1.671s 10 1.09x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 10.869s (~) 11.029s (~) 0.160s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.907s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.116s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 16.364s (-2.2%) 18.704s (~) 2.340s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 16.564s (-6.8% 🟢) 17.964s (-5.2% 🟢) 1.400s 2 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro 17.108s (+1.7%) 18.948s (~) 1.840s 2 1.05x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 14.510s (~) 15.026s (~) 0.516s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.551s (~) 15.022s (~) 0.471s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 29.073s (-3.6%) 31.920s (-1.0%) 2.847s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 29.928s (-4.7%) 32.293s (-4.0%) 2.365s 2 1.03x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 32.911s (-3.0%) 35.089s (-2.4%) 2.178s 2 1.13x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 14.044s (+1.3%) 14.455s (+3.1%) 0.411s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.159s (+0.5%) 15.021s (+1.9%) 0.862s 6 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 49.705s (-5.4% 🟢) 51.939s (-5.1% 🟢) 2.235s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 51.458s (-6.0% 🟢) 52.674s (-7.7% 🟢) 1.216s 2 1.04x
▲ Vercel Nitro 51.992s (-3.6%) 54.313s (-2.9%) 2.321s 2 1.05x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.266s (~) 2.009s (~) 0.743s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.277s (~) 2.010s (~) 0.733s 15 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.249s (-5.2% 🟢) 4.366s (+5.7% 🔺) 2.117s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.534s (+6.7% 🔺) 3.925s (+1.5%) 1.391s 8 1.13x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.785s (+11.6% 🔺) 4.664s (+18.3% 🔺) 1.879s 7 1.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.325s (~) 3.010s (~) 0.685s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.335s (-1.0%) 3.010s (~) 0.674s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.637s (-14.1% 🟢) 4.374s (-2.9%) 1.737s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.271s (+23.5% 🔺) 5.119s (+24.9% 🔺) 1.849s 6 1.24x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.298s (+9.1% 🔺) 4.879s (+10.8% 🔺) 1.582s 7 1.25x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.475s (-0.8%) 4.010s (~) 0.535s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.498s (~) 4.010s (~) 0.513s 8 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.594s (-13.7% 🟢) 4.369s (-6.5% 🟢) 1.775s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.030s (+2.8%) 4.996s (+6.0% 🔺) 1.966s 7 1.17x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.193s (+5.1% 🔺) 4.789s (+3.9%) 1.596s 7 1.23x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.268s (+0.8%) 2.008s (~) 0.740s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.272s (-1.8%) 2.008s (~) 0.736s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 1.889s (-3.3%) 4.063s (+6.6% 🔺) 2.174s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.949s (+1.2%) 3.956s (+6.5% 🔺) 2.007s 8 1.03x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.139s (-1.3%) 3.775s (+5.4% 🔺) 1.636s 8 1.13x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.330s (-2.1%) 3.009s (~) 0.678s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.350s (+0.7%) 3.010s (~) 0.659s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.371s (-9.5% 🟢) 4.349s (-1.4%) 1.978s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.399s (-8.4% 🟢) 4.209s (-1.4%) 1.810s 8 1.01x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.828s (+14.0% 🔺) 4.224s (+9.2% 🔺) 1.396s 8 1.19x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.470s (~) 4.011s (~) 0.541s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.480s (~) 4.012s (~) 0.532s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.790s (+7.7% 🔺) 4.723s (+10.0% 🔺) 1.933s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.014s (-13.0% 🟢) 4.858s (+0.8%) 1.844s 7 1.08x
▲ Vercel Express 3.477s (+18.5% 🔺) 6.093s (+44.6% 🔺) 2.617s 5 1.25x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.832s (-0.5%) 1.023s (~) 0.191s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.838s (-3.0%) 1.006s (~) 0.168s 60 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 8.900s (+3.9%) 10.594s (+3.8%) 1.693s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 9.281s (+0.9%) 11.765s (+7.1% 🔺) 2.484s 6 1.04x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 9.299s (+4.0%) 11.304s (+6.0% 🔺) 2.005s 6 1.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.940s (~) 2.075s (-1.2%) 0.135s 44 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.023s (-6.2% 🟢) 2.580s (-13.4% 🟢) 0.558s 35 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 26.917s (-8.5% 🟢) 29.704s (-5.8% 🟢) 2.787s 4 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 27.882s (~) 30.550s (+2.1%) 2.669s 3 1.04x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 33.292s (+16.3% 🔺) 34.856s (+14.8% 🔺) 1.563s 3 1.24x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.894s (-2.4%) 4.109s (-4.4%) 0.215s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 4.014s (-6.9% 🟢) 4.626s (-7.7% 🟢) 0.612s 26 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 69.060s (-3.6%) 71.678s (-3.7%) 2.618s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 76.694s (-2.2%) 79.162s (-1.3%) 2.468s 2 1.11x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 76.907s (~) 78.286s (-0.6%) 1.378s 2 1.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.281s (-5.0% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.726s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.282s (~) 1.007s (~) 0.724s 60 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 1.480s (-45.8% 🟢) 3.057s (-31.3% 🟢) 1.577s 20 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.626s (+6.8% 🔺) 3.424s (+10.5% 🔺) 1.798s 18 1.10x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 1.774s (+22.4% 🔺) 3.472s (+15.4% 🔺) 1.699s 18 1.20x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.494s (+1.1%) 1.007s (~) 0.513s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.497s (-5.5% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.510s 90 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.846s (+15.1% 🔺) 4.630s (+11.8% 🔺) 1.785s 20 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.010s (+9.9% 🔺) 4.989s (+14.7% 🔺) 1.980s 19 1.06x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.794s (+12.7% 🔺) 5.332s (+10.5% 🔺) 1.539s 17 1.33x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.793s (+0.8%) 1.008s (~) 0.215s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.817s (-2.7%) 1.010s (-0.9%) 0.192s 119 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 6.273s (-8.4% 🟢) 8.139s (-6.4% 🟢) 1.866s 15 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 7.147s (-6.9% 🟢) 9.070s (-3.0%) 1.923s 14 1.14x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 19.079s (+163.6% 🔺) 20.852s (+142.0% 🔺) 1.773s 11 3.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.218s (+9.2% 🔺) 1.000s (~) 0.001s (-12.5% 🟢) 1.012s (~) 0.794s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.218s (+1.7%) 0.997s (~) 0.001s (-41.2% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.792s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.603s (+8.4% 🔺) 3.185s (+5.3% 🔺) 0.322s (+6.2% 🔺) 4.068s (+8.0% 🔺) 2.466s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 1.636s (~) 2.887s (-2.9%) 0.589s (+36.8% 🔺) 4.009s (+5.8% 🔺) 2.373s 10 1.02x
▲ Vercel Nitro 1.739s (+11.9% 🔺) 3.127s (+4.5%) 0.550s (-6.0% 🟢) 4.209s (+5.0% 🔺) 2.470s 10 1.09x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.616s (-4.8%) 1.004s (~) 0.004s (-21.9% 🟢) 1.022s (~) 0.407s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.622s (+2.9%) 1.005s (~) 0.004s (-5.1% 🟢) 1.022s (~) 0.399s 59 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 4.172s (-4.7%) 5.699s (-4.9%) 0.806s (+173.0% 🔺) 6.972s (+2.3%) 2.800s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 4.257s (+0.7%) 5.896s (+0.8%) 0.280s (+27.1% 🔺) 6.657s (+2.6%) 2.400s 10 1.02x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.357s (+6.0% 🔺) 5.843s (+4.7%) 0.262s (-63.9% 🟢) 6.489s (-2.9%) 2.131s 10 1.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.942s (-5.1% 🟢) 1.196s (-10.4% 🟢) 0.000s (-56.0% 🟢) 1.210s (-11.7% 🟢) 0.268s 50 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.982s (+4.0%) 1.221s (+6.5% 🔺) 0.000s (+76.9% 🔺) 1.243s (+7.0% 🔺) 0.261s 49 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.646s (~) 3.823s (+2.9%) 0.000s (-50.0% 🟢) 4.267s (+3.0%) 1.620s 15 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.697s (+5.9% 🔺) 3.900s (+8.8% 🔺) 0.000s (-46.4% 🟢) 4.396s (+7.1% 🔺) 1.699s 14 1.02x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.817s (-13.4% 🟢) 4.060s (-7.4% 🟢) 0.000s (-38.1% 🟢) 4.460s (-6.5% 🟢) 1.644s 14 1.06x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.776s (~) 2.140s (+2.0%) 0.000s (+107.1% 🔺) 2.152s (+1.9%) 0.376s 28 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.779s (~) 2.142s (~) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 2.153s (~) 0.373s 28 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.300s (-2.8%) 4.809s (-0.9%) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 5.276s (-0.7%) 1.977s 12 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.810s (-12.4% 🟢) 5.067s (-9.2% 🟢) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 5.459s (-8.7% 🟢) 1.649s 11 1.15x
▲ Vercel Nitro 4.318s (+21.5% 🔺) 5.849s (+19.6% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 6.325s (+18.7% 🔺) 2.006s 10 1.31x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
🐘 Postgres Nitro 16/21
▲ Vercel Express 11/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 19/21
Next.js (Turbopack) ▲ Vercel 21/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

❌ Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: failure
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

🧪 E2E Test Results

❌ Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 912 0 67 979
✅ 💻 Local Development 886 0 182 1068
✅ 📦 Local Production 886 0 182 1068
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 886 0 182 1068
✅ 🪟 Windows 81 0 8 89
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 133 74 24 231
✅ 📋 Other 225 0 42 267
Total 4009 74 687 4770

❌ Failed Tests

🌍 Community Worlds (74 failed)

mongodb (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNV9GKB2GR97CQQ11AMA9VQX
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9GWF8W5D1GTN4T920242Y
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9M9T3GJ6YTX346XE6SEG3
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNV9RK0BDECFSN50JBATWQF2
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNV9YZEC3NTXAMTNX48WPYY2

redis (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNV9GKB2GR97CQQ11AMA9VQX
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9GWF8W5D1GTN4T920242Y
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9M9T3GJ6YTX346XE6SEG3
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNV9RK0BDECFSN50JBATWQF2
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNV9YZEC3NTXAMTNX48WPYY2

turso (60 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9FCBWHFPPTN38KMAHAHRJ
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9FCBWHFPPTN38KMAHAHRJ
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KNV9GQP921CT4XFWF98XBD0T
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9FK6RHGCJ8F1FX8SFHJ8G
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9FQTRWWGHX2HD2HCHAZ45
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9FT18TAWR470V0KARZAXQ
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9H2SGP6XZ2QTT1SCX6CNZ
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9G65XF0ZE4P4HBX4RB3GE
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNV9GKB2GR97CQQ11AMA9VQX
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9GWF8W5D1GTN4T920242Y
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9H360SEYSQAGPD79ZN7WF
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9HF5V8H8AGXSE3KZ0N5X9
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9HKR1XTTBX1GNW8H44K00
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9HNZRDJM6TG8BV2VW00YV
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9M9T3GJ6YTX346XE6SEG3
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KNV9MDCPPJ9JQTTZH1CF553D
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • error handling not registered WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KNV9QYD9902K9B6RASHQG51A
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNV9RK0BDECFSN50JBATWQF2
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KNV9S8WZG1KFQDCRCTD981P6
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KNV9SX085X509J6JHP49NKZW
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KNV9T65Y4344EWKF395N8GE6
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KNV9TBY0KSC7CTYYYRQWC47C
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KNV9TE79N9KR57FRR8MHWJV0
  • runClassSerializationWorkflow - Run instances serialize across workflow/step boundaries
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KNV9TXW5JY4FHR5E5YCQNA8W
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KNV9V3R47AB2APW06ED7Z02B
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KNV9VAJRYAX9Q8KTHMHYMSJQ
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KNV9VG38PXTQKJHWRKG06VZ9
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KNV9VNHJB1YNCTWVD4T3C7RA
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KNV9VW8GJ4D7AQ414Z9AA7TS
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNV9W3GC9CX8A6W9D7SQ1PH3
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KNV9WERR1JA41RCR78KPS9KW
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KNV9WPQ98H8KN29ERHFX4JWT
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNV9WXCRTXWSN1GTXAZSQ8C7
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNV9X6QBFDEQ58YS6WJKJ4EX
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KNV9XJKJ1YBP840S812YV1A3
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KNV9Y8MX80D7WZVRCX9KFQRQ
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KNV9YK4F2M9XVWRD1Z8ZXB49
  • importMetaUrlWorkflow - import.meta.url is available in step bundles | wrun_01KNV9YSRZ6N5W45CVXDEMH75Z
  • metadataFromHelperWorkflow - getWorkflowMetadata/getStepMetadata work from module-level helper (#1577) | wrun_01KNV9YX5H4SQ828GWRYZZV7EE
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNV9YZEC3NTXAMTNX48WPYY2
  • getterStepWorkflow - getter functions with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNV9Z2ZGMZQMQT3QNEPQ8KGM

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 82 0 7
✅ example 82 0 7
✅ express 82 0 7
✅ fastify 82 0 7
✅ hono 82 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 87 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 87 0 2
✅ nitro 82 0 7
✅ nuxt 82 0 7
✅ sveltekit 82 0 7
✅ vite 82 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 75 0 14
✅ express-stable 75 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 75 0 14
✅ hono-stable 75 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 62 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 81 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 62 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 81 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 75 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 75 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 75 0 14
✅ vite-stable 75 0 14
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 75 0 14
✅ express-stable 75 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 75 0 14
✅ hono-stable 75 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 62 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 81 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 62 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 81 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 75 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 75 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 75 0 14
✅ vite-stable 75 0 14
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 75 0 14
✅ express-stable 75 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 75 0 14
✅ hono-stable 75 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 62 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 81 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 62 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 81 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 75 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 75 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 75 0 14
✅ vite-stable 75 0 14
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 81 0 8
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 6 0 0
❌ mongodb 56 7 8
✅ redis-dev 6 0 0
❌ redis 56 7 8
✅ turso-dev 6 0 0
❌ turso 3 60 8
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 75 0 14
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 75 0 14
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 75 0 14

📋 View full workflow run

@christopherkindl
DCO Remediation Commit for christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkind…
a733be3 
…l@users.noreply.github.com>

I, christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkindl@users.noreply.github.com>, hereby add my Signed-off-by to this commit: eefbc97

Signed-off-by: christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkindl@users.noreply.github.com>
@christopherkindl @claude
fix: adjust bar border radius and add @container to feature cards
c6f3ed9 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkindl@users.noreply.github.com>
@christopherkindl @claude
fix: use rounded-lg for bar border radius, add @container to wide card
14c9c66 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkindl@users.noreply.github.com>
@christopherkindl christopherkindl marked this pull request as draft April 9, 2026 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@christopherkindl