[sylvestre]

_{Stack created with GitHub Stacks CLI • Give Feedback 💬}

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing. Review the Copilot code review billing settings.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing. Review the Copilot code review billing settings.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing. Review the Copilot code review billing settings.

[Copilot]

Warning

Copilot couldn't run its full agentic review because it didn't start before the timeout. Make sure your repository has a runner available, or add a copilot-code-review.yml file specifying one with the runs-on attribute. See the docs for more details.

Copilot review overview

2 open issues

• value is a &str and slot is a &mut String, so clone_into does not type-check here (it… · New
• std::env::var_os(\"TERM\") yields an OsString, and comparing it directly to a &str (`term !=… · New

_{Review effort: Lite}

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 7.71%

3 warnings

⚠️ 24 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 19 benchmarks with a significant change ran on different hardware

Their base and head results were measured on machines with a different CPU, core count or memory, so the changes might not come from the code. Run base and head on the same runner type.

Learn more about Macro Runners

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 19 benchmarks with a significant change ran in a different software environment

Their base and head results were measured with a different OS or toolchain, such as compiler, runtime or library versions, so the changes might come from this difference rather than from the code. Open an affected benchmark to see what changed.

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 16 regressed benchmarks
✅ 7 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	cmd_diff_release_equal[25000]	24.1 µs	27.6 µs	-12.97%
❌	cmd_diff_gnu_equal[25000]	22.6 µs	25.9 µs	-12.69%
❌	cmd_diff_gnu_equal[10000]	22.7 µs	25.8 µs	-12.3%
❌	cmd_cmp_gnu_equal[25000]	22.6 µs	25.6 µs	-11.68%
❌	cmd_cmp_gnu_equal[10000]	22.7 µs	25.6 µs	-11.47%
❌	cmd_diff_gnu_equal[100]	22.2 µs	25 µs	-11.28%
❌	cmd_cmp_release_equal[25000]	24.2 µs	27.2 µs	-11.03%
❌	cmd_diff_gnu_equal[1000]	22.3 µs	25 µs	-10.85%
❌	cmd_diff_release_equal[1000]	24.4 µs	27.4 µs	-10.79%
❌	cmd_diff_release_equal[10000]	24 µs	26.8 µs	-10.54%
❌	cmd_cmp_release_equal[1000]	24.4 µs	27.2 µs	-10.43%
❌	cmd_cmp_release_equal[10000]	24.5 µs	27.2 µs	-9.81%
❌	cmd_diff_release_equal[100]	24.3 µs	27 µs	-9.78%
❌	cmd_cmp_gnu_equal[100]	22.4 µs	24.4 µs	-8.03%
❌	cmd_cmp_gnu_equal[1000]	22.5 µs	24.3 µs	-7.61%
❌	cmd_cmp_release_equal[100]	25.1 µs	27.1 µs	-7.31%
⚡	cmp_parser	12.4 µs	10.6 µs	+17.44%
⚡	diff_parser	6.1 ms	5.7 ms	+6.84%
⚡	cmp_compare_files_different[100]	79.2 µs	76.7 µs	+3.22%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing diff-color (60ba20e) with diff-stdin-dir (2dd7cc3)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on diff-stdin-dir (b5da98a) during the generation of this report, so b131993 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

GNU diffutils testsuite comparison:

Test results comparison:
  Current:   TOTAL: 33 / PASSED: 11 / FAILED: 18 / SKIPPED: 4
  Reference: TOTAL: 33 / PASSED: 8 / FAILED: 21 / SKIPPED: 4

Changes from main branch:
  TOTAL: +0
  PASSED: +3
  FAILED: -3

Test improvements (3):
  + binary
  + new-file
  + stdin