[xtqqczze]

Use a shared cfg alias for BSD targets to reduce duplication and keep platform-specific conditional compilation consistent across the codebase.

Closes #15423.
Closes #15425.
Follow-up to #10443.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will regress 2 benchmarks

1 warning, 1 note

⚠️ 121 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

ℹ️ 1 benchmark has no flamegraph

The flamegraph wasn't generated: most of the time was spent in runtime internals, which would leave nothing useful to analyze.

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 398 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 70 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	CPU Simulation	sort_numeric_utf8_locale	35.8 ms	37.1 ms	-3.67%
❌	CPU Simulation	sort_reverse_utf8_locale	79.1 ms	81.9 ms	-3.48%
⚡	Memory	du_deep_tree[(100, 3)]	82.4 KB	76.5 KB	+7.68%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing xtqqczze:refactor/cfg_aliases/bsd (f94f62a) with main (6201c4f)²}

Footnotes

1. 70 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (00c3626) during the generation of this report, so 6201c4f was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[xtqqczze]

@sylvestre ready

[oech3]

This is maintainer's decision, but it would be nice if #15299 was merged at 1st which was reciently rebased by maintainer.

[xtqqczze]

Check failures tracked by #16147.