Skip to content

Use local registry#75

Merged
werebus merged 1 commit intokamalfrom
werebus/kamal-registry
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

Use local registry#75
werebus merged 1 commit intokamalfrom
werebus/kamal-registry

Conversation

@werebus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@werebus werebus commented Nov 17, 2025

Based on #72

We probably can use GHCR, But Kamal 2.8 adds support for a "local" registry, which should be adequate until we need access to these container images for anything other than deployment.

We probably _can_ use GHCR, But Kamal 2.8 adds support for a "local"
registry, which should be adequate until we need access to these
container images for anything other than deploy.
@werebus werebus merged commit 6c069a7 into kamal Nov 18, 2025
3 checks passed
@werebus werebus deleted the werebus/kamal-registry branch November 18, 2025 14:14
werebus added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2026
* kamal init

* configure kamal halfway

* Use local registry (#75)

We probably _can_ use GHCR, But Kamal 2.8 adds support for a "local"
registry, which should be adequate until we need access to these
container images for anything other than deploy.

* Remove relience on PWD for reading Ruby version (#76)

Technically, you can run Kamal from elsewhere and specify `-c <config
file>`.

* Real hosts and SSH confg (#77)

I _do_ think deploy via Jenkins is the way to go eventually. But an MVP
can just be deploying more-or-less the way we do with Capistrano.

---------

Co-authored-by: Matt Moretti <werebus@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants