Comfortable with oclif instead of yargs? #2
Description
@mikecao I have significant interest in kick starting this to display some data as part of a CI process. I would reuse the already existing umami api-client. I need this for an upcoming project so can build it in my fork.
If you would consider it for contribution back, I have found that Oclif is highly opinionated and much easier to work with for verb-based clis. Are you open to heading in that direction or are you committed to yargs?