BE-03-CLOSEOUT-01-SPEC: specify the BE-03 post-merge control correction - #812
Conversation
…l correction BE-03 merged through PR #809, but active committed programme state still describes it as an unmerged draft awaiting a fresh independent review and CTO merge authorization, still asserts that BE-03 implementation is NOT AUTHORIZED and that feature/publisher-services/be-03 must not exist, and still lists BE-03 as an unsatisfied blocking dependency of BE-04, MIG-01, APP-01 and APP-02. ADR-0005 section 8 requires a bounded post-merge task for exactly that: a committed tracker holding materially incorrect programme state, as distinct from transcribing a merge SHA, a review identifier or an authorization identifier, which section 4.1 item 6 prohibits. This commit specifies that correction. It does not perform it. The classified stale-state search over the active Publisher Services and shared engineering-control surface is recorded in Annex A of the specification and summarized in the authoring report: 17 active stale statements across five files, against three implementation reports and the BE-01/BE-02/ADR-01 task records preserved as historical evidence, ten statements preserved as current and correct, and six preserved as out of scope. Three decisions warrant review attention. BE-03.md is classified as active stale state, departing from the BE-02-CLOSEOUT-01 precedent that left BE-02.md untouched. Its section 23 and header state that BE-03 implementation is NOT AUTHORIZED and that its branch must not exist. Those are present-tense operative instructions rather than implementation-time evidence, and its Status: DRAFT line contradicts task-status.md, which records the specification as repository-authoritative through PR #808. The specification confines the correction to lifecycle-boundary prose and forbids altering any approved requirement. The decisions.md section 3a authority-condition construction is preserved in full, including its Decision state line and internal "candidate" phrasing. Both halves of its condition hold, and the section states its own resolution rule: after both hold it is an approved programme decision with no further status edit required. Writing a literal APPROVED token would produce the approval-state churn ADR-0005 section 4.1 item 10 prohibits. Only the references outside that self-resolving construction are corrected, including the internal contradiction in task-status.md between next-action 10 and the APP-01 row. The PR #811 migration renames (BE-02 20260812_v1.7.0 -> 20260811_v1.7.0; BE-03 20260813_v1.7.0 -> 20260812_v1.7.0) are classified as historical evidence per the CTO ruling. Every repository reference to a pre-rename path sits inside an exact-head report and is preserved. Migration content and the BE-02-then-BE-03 apply order were verified unchanged, so no architecture, ordering or release-safety concern arises and no stop condition applies. Where the closeout's own prose names the current migration it uses 20260812_v1.7.0 and distinguishes it from the implementation-head path. One materially false statement is deliberately left out of scope and recorded as residual BE-02 control debt: README.md section 5 item 7 still asserts that no DistributionPlatform enum exists in code, which BE-02's merge falsified and which BE-02-CLOSEOUT-01 corrected elsewhere but missed here. Documentation only. No runtime code, migration, schema.rs, GraphQL contract, generated client, Cargo file, workflow or environment configuration changes. No closeout correction is performed in task-status.md, README.md, decisions.md, rollout-plan.md, platform-inventory.md or control-gaps.md. Issues #765 and #766 and PR #799 are untouched. The BE-03-CLOSEOUT-01 implementation remains unauthorized.
|
CTO specification approval and merge authorization — 2026-08-14 I approve the
Scope of approval: the bounded documentation-only This approval and merge authorization do not authorize Any change to the PR head invalidates this exact-head authorization. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Bounded review remediation for BE-03-CLOSEOUT-01. Additive only; the existing commit is untouched. Finding 1 - correct the ADR-0005 evidence claim. The CHANGELOG entry and implementation report sections 5 and 15 asserted absolutely that no merge commit SHA is transcribed into repository files, which the same change contradicts by legitimately recording b51bcc0 as the exact CTO-authorized implementation base, its identity as PR #812's merge commit, and PR #809's merge commit as ancestry evidence. The wording now distinguishes prohibited terminal-lifecycle transcription - copying GitHub lifecycle metadata merely to restate terminal review, authorization or merge state - from exact SHAs recorded as authorized base or preflight/ancestry evidence, which repository controls require as execution evidence. No exact-base or preflight evidence is removed and BE-03-CLOSEOUT-01.md section 18 is unchanged. Finding 2 - record the actual link-check command. Report section 9 carried a prose description rather than an executable command. It now records the exact reproducible command and its fresh result: 97 relative links checked, 0 broken, re-run after every repository-file edit including these. Also clarifies report section 5.1: the two items are the additional BE-03 source-state hits found by the fresh classified search, distinct from the closeout task record's own Status and section 18 updates that the implementation authorization separately requires. No classification, runtime, schema, migration, workflow or downstream semantics changed.
What this is
This PR specifies
BE-03-CLOSEOUT-01. It does not implement the closeout.BE-03merged through PR #809, but active committed programme state still describes it as an unmerged draft awaiting a fresh independent review and CTO merge authorization, still asserts thatBE-03implementation isNOT AUTHORIZEDand thatfeature/publisher-services/be-03must not exist, and still listsBE-03as an unsatisfied blocking dependency ofBE-04,MIG-01,APP-01andAPP-02.ADR-0005section 8 requires a bounded post-merge task for exactly that — a committed tracker holding materially incorrect programme state — as distinct from transcribing a merge SHA, a review identifier or an authorization identifier, which section 4.1 item 6 prohibits.Boundaries
BE-03-CLOSEOUT-01; it does not implement the closeout.schema.rs, GraphQL contract, generated SDL/client, Cargo file, workflow, deployment or environment configuration is touched.task-status.md,README.md,decisions.md,rollout-plan.md,platform-inventory.md,control-gaps.mdorBE-03.md.BE-03-CLOSEOUT-01implementation remains separately unauthorized, pending explicit CTO authorization against a freshly verified base.BE-04remains separately unspecified and unauthorized. Nodistribution_job,distribution_job_targetordistribution_job_attemptruntime behaviour, no automatic back-catalogue job creation and no dissemination exists merely becauseBE-03merged.OBSERVE/ENFORCE, workflow changes or dispatch, and production access all remainNOT AUTHORIZED.Base
Branched from
a4585a8d89166577da5ce6f46ce51ddb134b3f7e, the merge commit of forward-integration PR #811, whose first parent3ba4452c316399d80cd8d85e7d5e1bd05e252664is the merge commit ofBE-03implementation PR #809 (headc678bdcec33c2aa01be1f887a85ff851dfe35891).An earlier authorization named
3ba4452cas the expected head; that attempt stoppedBLOCKEDwithout creating a branch or editing a file, and this base was re-authorized after CTO review of PR #811.Files
docs/engineering/ai-delivery/tasks/BE-03-CLOSEOUT-01.md(new)docs/engineering/ai-delivery/implementation-reports/BE-03-CLOSEOUT-01-SPEC-implementation-report.md(new)CHANGELOG.md— one entry under the existing## [Unreleased]/### AddedClassified stale-state analysis
Recorded in full in Annex A of the specification.
ACTIVE STALE STATE - CORRECTHISTORICAL RECORD - PRESERVECURRENT AND CORRECT - PRESERVEdecisions.md§3a in full and the CG-13 activation blockOUT OF SCOPE - PRESERVEThree decisions warranting review attention
1.
BE-03.mdis classified as active stale state, departing from theBE-02-CLOSEOUT-01precedent that leftBE-02.mduntouched. Its section 23 and header state thatBE-03implementation isNOT AUTHORIZEDand that its branch must not exist — present-tense operative instructions, not implementation-time evidence — and itsStatus: DRAFTcontradictstask-status.md, which records the specification as repository-authoritative through PR #808. The specification confines the correction to lifecycle-boundary prose and forbids altering any approved requirement. The conservative alternative is to leave it untouched.2.
decisions.md§3a is preserved in full, including itsDecision state:line and internal "candidate" phrasing. Both halves of its authority condition hold, and the section states its own resolution rule: after both hold it is an approved programme decision "without requiring a separate lifecycle-status edit to this file". A literalAPPROVEDtoken would produce the approval-state churnADR-0005§4.1(10) prohibits. Only references outside that self-resolving construction are corrected — including the internal contradiction intask-status.mdbetween next-action 10 and the APP-01 row.3. The PR #811 migration renames are classified as historical evidence, per the CTO ruling:
Every repository reference to a pre-rename path sits inside an exact-head report and is preserved. Migration content and the BE-02-then-BE-03 apply order were verified unchanged, so no architecture, ordering or release-safety concern arises. New prose naming the current migration uses
20260812_v1.7.0and distinguishes it from the implementation-head path.Recorded but deliberately out of scope
docs/publisher-services/README.md§5 item 7 still asserts "noDistributionPlatformenum exists in code", which BE-02's merge falsified.BE-02-CLOSEOUT-01carried an acceptance criterion targeting exactly this and corrected theplatform-inventory.mdandcontrol-gaps.mdinstances; this one survived. Recorded as residual BE-02 control debt and left to its own bounded task rather than folded in.Validation
git diff --checkCHANGELOG.md+ 2 newdocs/files onlythoth-*,.github/,Cargo.*match (grep exit 1)docs/publisher-services/,repository-map/,BE-03.md— no diff### Added; no duplicate headingFull workspace gate not run and not required: documentation-only change under root
AGENTS.md§8, which reserves it for Rust/domain changes. No file under any workspace member is modified.Draft. Not to be marked ready for review or merged without explicit CTO instruction. The authoring agent does not approve its own specification.