Skip to content

Move devserver to internal/devserver#374

Closed
lilydoar wants to merge 1 commit into
lilydoar/stack/7from
lilydoar/stack/8
Closed

Move devserver to internal/devserver#374
lilydoar wants to merge 1 commit into
lilydoar/stack/7from
lilydoar/stack/8

Conversation

@lilydoar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lilydoar lilydoar commented May 28, 2026

Stacked PRs:


Move devserver to internal/devserver

devserver (the embedded Temporal dev-server launcher) has no consumer outside
the root module. Application code that isn't part of a public API belongs
under internal/, where the import boundary is compiler-enforced. Move it and
update the two importers.

Testing: go build ./... passes; the internal/devserver unit tests
(TestAllocatePorts, TestDefaultOutputDirUsesRepoRoot, TestWriteDynamicConfig,
...) pass.

@lilydoar lilydoar requested review from a team as code owners May 28, 2026 21:54
devserver (the embedded Temporal dev-server launcher) has no consumer outside
the root module. Application code that isn't part of a public API belongs
under internal/, where the import boundary is compiler-enforced. Move it and
update the two importers.

Testing: `go build ./...` passes; the internal/devserver unit tests
(TestAllocatePorts, TestDefaultOutputDirUsesRepoRoot, TestWriteDynamicConfig,
...) pass.

stack-info: PR: #374, branch: lilydoar/stack/8
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@stephanos stephanos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, but the idea is that temporalio/temporal#10413 will leverage the devserver

@lilydoar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing — the module-organization stack was rebased (devserver move dropped, since devserver must stay exported for temporal to import it). Recreating the stack fresh.

@lilydoar lilydoar closed this May 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants