docs: reviewer on-ramp (REVIEWING.md), SECURITY.md, audit-status note - #52
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Make hostile security review cheap and give findings somewhere to land. - REVIEWING.md: the one invariant, 7 falsifiable claims (C1–C7) each pointing at the file to attack, the trust boundary as exact functions (handle_connection + its gate chain, ValidatedRequest::validate, classify_key/prompt_tty, exec_*), a "where we have NO assurance" section led by the TUI rendering layer, and a container one-liner. - SECURITY.md: private-vulnerability-reporting channel + maintainer contact, best-effort response, scope/out-of-scope, not-yet-audited status. - README: visible "not yet independently audited" note linking both. GitHub private vulnerability reporting has been enabled on the repo. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Makes hostile security review cheap and gives findings a place to land. Framed around the falsifiable invariant rather than 'please review my project'.
handle_connection+ gate chain,ValidatedRequest::validate,classify_key/prompt_tty,exec_*); a 'where we have NO assurance' section (TUI rendering layer first); container one-liner.Decisions applied: note-only (keep distributing), private vuln reporting enabled, best-effort GitHub-handle contact, no outreach text yet.
Please edit for voice/accuracy before merging — these are public security claims.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code