Skip to content

Add stackhpc-image-elements repository - #578

Open
priteau wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
stackhpc-image-elements
Open

priteau wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
stackhpc-image-elements

Conversation

@priteau

@priteau priteau commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@priteau priteau self-assigned this Sep 18, 2026
@priteau
priteau requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2026 12:40
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Repository: stackhpc/stackhpc-release-train/.coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 8b88ee75-ee46-467e-98c5-ef782525434d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Summary

Add stackhpc-image-elements to the source-repository manifest as a single-branch repository. Disable workflow synchronisation and apply the OpenStack team CODEOWNERS file.

Walkthrough

The source-repository manifest now includes stackhpc-image-elements as a single-branch repository. The entry specifies no workflows and assigns OpenStack team CODEOWNERS.

Changes

Source repository registration

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add repository manifest entry
ansible/inventory/group_vars/all/source-repositories
Adds stackhpc-image-elements with single-branch, no-workflow, and OpenStack CODEOWNERS settings.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: 🟡 Moderate · up to 15e72

The repository registration currently fails the required consistency validation. Add it to the Terraform OpenStack list before merging.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1


ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 5c5c62e1-9b1d-4c44-8f95-800ffcfc02b5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0258495 and 15e72ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ansible/inventory/group_vars/all/source-repositories

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

Comment thread ansible/inventory/group_vars/all/source-repositories
@Alex-Welsh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@priteau
priteau force-pushed the stackhpc-image-elements branch from 15e72ec to 96f2195 Compare October 7, 2026 06:56
@stackhpc-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success

Terraform Initialization ⚙️success

Terraform Validation 🤖success

Validation Output

Success! The configuration is valid.


Terraform Plan 📖success

Show Plan

undefined

Pusher: @priteau, Action: pull_request, Working Directory: ``, Workflow: Terraform GitHub

@priteau

priteau commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@priteau
priteau requested a review from Alex-Welsh October 7, 2026 07:09

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants