docs(efficacy): the control read at three judgings per tree - #1853
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The gpt-6-astra top-up completed three judgings on each of the six trees. The control README records the means: every primary falls on the tree built to damage it and rises on one built to improve it. Part of #1767. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
braboj
added
P2
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #1767.
The gpt-6-astra top-up (
judge.py --root C:/efficacy/control-six --repeat 3, 11 judgings, 0 failed) completed three judgings on each of the control's six trees. The control README gains a section with the means and the three scores per cell. Every primary falls on the tree built to damage it and rises on one built to improve it.One existing sentence changed: the note that the top-up had stopped on the usage limit now points to the new section. Conformance counts this as an edit to an existing file under
tests/. It is prose in a README, not a test.No CHANGELOG entry: the benchmark is this repository's own.
Checks run: smoke 33/33; conformance 0 failed, its readings read.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code