Skip to content

chore: bootstrap contributors-please state file - #49

Merged
smorin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/contributors-bootstrap
Jul 16, 2026
Merged

chore: bootstrap contributors-please state file#49
smorin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/contributors-bootstrap

Conversation

@smorin

@smorin smorin commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Second Update Contributors failure: No state file found at .contributors.jsonl — the action requires a bootstrapped state file. Generated via npx contributors-please init. https://claude.ai/code/session_014DjTALJi3LJhYmrdpw6Rej

Review in cubic

Generated with 'npx contributors-please init' — the action requires
.contributors.jsonl to exist before its first run.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014DjTALJi3LJhYmrdpw6Rej
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 16, 2026 07:14
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@smorin, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 13 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9f47beb5-da13-40ca-a1cb-3edcb26f29ff

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d8c08ed and 5e05e13.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .contributors.jsonl

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Bootstraps the contributors-please state file so the “Update Contributors” GitHub Action can run without failing on a missing .contributors.jsonl.

Changes:

  • Add an initial .contributors.jsonl state file (JSONL) with current contributor state entries.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5e05e13653

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .contributors.jsonl
Comment on lines +1 to +2
{"login":"dependabot[bot]","name":"dependabot[bot]","profile":"https://github.com/apps/dependabot","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/29110?v=4","source":"commit","pinned":false,"categories":["code"],"title":"Code Contributor","commits":3,"first_seen":"2025-07-22","last_updated":"2026-07-16"}
{"login":"smorin-release-please[bot]","name":"smorin-release-please[bot]","profile":"https://github.com/apps/smorin-release-please","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/124719?v=4","source":"commit","pinned":false,"categories":["code","docs"],"title":"Documentation Contributor","commits":3,"first_seen":"2026-05-30","last_updated":"2026-07-16"}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Bootstrap a renderable contributor identity

These two bootstrapped records are both non-renderable in this repo: .contributors.yml ignores both logins, and contributors-please also drops logins ending in [bot]; meanwhile the human commit history is Steve Morin's steve.morin@gmail.com commits and there is no .mailmap/identity_map for contributors-please to join that address to smorin. With this state the workflow stops failing for a missing file but renders zero contributors and will keep doing so on future runs until the human identity is added or mapped, so the bootstrap should include/map a renderable contributor instead of only ignored bots.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

Re-trigger cubic

@smorin
smorin merged commit c003da2 into main Jul 16, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
@smorin
smorin deleted the fix/contributors-bootstrap branch July 17, 2026 05:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants