Skip to content

ci: add config-server cache-backend integration job - #478

Closed
steiler wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/cache-backend-integration-job
Closed

ci: add config-server cache-backend integration job#478
steiler wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/cache-backend-integration-job

Conversation

@steiler

@steiler steiler commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Adds a second single.yml job with cache_type: config-server and suites_to_run: 00-setup,01-crs,05-cache-backend.
  • Leaves the existing integration-tests job’s with: block unchanged so open PRs that never rebase stay on one job.

Depends on sdcio/integration-tests #116 (cache_type on single.yml@main). Until tests/05-cache-backend is on the checked-out integration-tests ref, that suite step no-ops; 00-setup/01-crs still deploy with the config-server cache backend.

Test plan

  • This PR’s Checks show both integration-tests and integration-tests (config-server cache backend).
  • An older open PR that has not rebased still has a single integration job.
  • The new job does not fail with “Unexpected input: cache_type”.

Made with Cursor

Adds a second single.yml invocation with cache_type config-server. The existing integration-tests job is unchanged so in-flight PRs that do not rebase keep one job.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@steiler
steiler requested a review from a team as a code owner August 25, 2026 08:38
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@steiler

steiler commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Superseded: the Cache-backend job belongs on the feature PR so it lands with the functionality. Moved to #471

@steiler steiler closed this Aug 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant