Skip to content

CLDSRV-942: Fix missing s3 logs artifact for S3C#6216

Open
BourgoisMickael wants to merge 2 commits into
development/9.2from
bugfix/CLDSRV-942-s3-logs-coverage
Open

CLDSRV-942: Fix missing s3 logs artifact for S3C#6216
BourgoisMickael wants to merge 2 commits into
development/9.2from
bugfix/CLDSRV-942-s3-logs-coverage

Conversation

@BourgoisMickael

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Fix missing s3 logs artifact for S3C
  • Fix missing coverage for matrix job (s3c & file)

The production image uses yarn start and output logs
to docker instead of file

The testcoverage image redirects the stdout/stderr output to files
S3C and file ft tests had a different job name path on disk
than github.job for codecov coverage.
@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello bourgoismickael,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael requested review from a team, anurag4DSB, fredmnl and leif-scality and removed request for a team July 1, 2026 17:33
@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@BourgoisMickael

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/create_integration_branches

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Conflict

A conflict has been raised during the creation of
integration branch w/9.3/bugfix/CLDSRV-942-s3-logs-coverage with contents from bugfix/CLDSRV-942-s3-logs-coverage
and development/9.3.

I have not created the integration branch.

Here are the steps to resolve this conflict:

 git fetch
 git checkout -B w/9.3/bugfix/CLDSRV-942-s3-logs-coverage origin/development/9.3
 git merge origin/bugfix/CLDSRV-942-s3-logs-coverage
 # <intense conflict resolution>
 git commit
 git push -u origin w/9.3/bugfix/CLDSRV-942-s3-logs-coverage

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.83%. Comparing base (7b2dbfb) to head (fec79cf).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph
see 7 files with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.2    #6216      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            84.50%   84.83%   +0.32%     
===================================================
  Files                  204      204              
  Lines                13217    13217              
===================================================
+ Hits                 11169    11212      +43     
+ Misses                2048     2005      -43     
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 68.17% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
file-ft-tests-null-compat 68.63% <ø> (?)
kmip-ft-tests 28.41% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests 69.35% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 69.35% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
multiple-backend 35.68% <ø> (ø)
s3c-ft-tests-v0 63.49% <ø> (?)
s3c-ft-tests-v0-null-compat 63.56% <ø> (?)
s3c-ft-tests-v1 63.47% <ø> (?)
sur-tests 35.96% <ø> (-0.84%) ⬇️
sur-tests-inflights 37.83% <ø> (ø)
unit 70.34% <ø> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests 34.69% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants