build(linux): remove skip for siginfo_t field - #5523
Open
dybucc wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Remove skip for `siginfo_t` field as now the full definition is used since rust-lang#5345 was merged.
dybucc
force-pushed
the
remove-siginfo_t-skips
branch
from
September 11, 2026 15:27
994379e to
825618f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Removes the only skip that can be feasibly removed after #5345 merged.
Other skips for
siginfo_tstuff are concerned with target OSs otherthan Linux. Follow-up to 1.
Checklist
libc-test/semverhave been updated*LASTor*MAXhave thestandard doc comment
cargo test -p libc-test --target mytarget);especially relevant for platforms that may not be checked in CI
@rustbot label +stable-nominated
Footnotes
https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/pull/5345#pullrequestreview-5106852891 ↩