Skip to content

[Build] Pin onnx-related packages#3769

Merged
svekars merged 2 commits intopytorch:mainfrom
titaiwangms:titaiwang/update_onnx_req
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

[Build] Pin onnx-related packages#3769
svekars merged 2 commits intopytorch:mainfrom
titaiwangms:titaiwang/update_onnx_req

Conversation

@titaiwangms
Copy link
Contributor

@titaiwangms titaiwangms commented Feb 13, 2026

Fix https://github.com/pytorch/tutorials/actions/runs/21965226194/job/63555988496?pr=3761#step:9:4434

Description

Pin ONNX-related packages: onnx and onnxscript to avoid potential regression (for example, 0.6.1 onnxscript)

Checklist

  • The issue that is being fixed is referred in the description (see above "Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER")
  • Only one issue is addressed in this pull request
  • Labels from the issue that this PR is fixing are added to this pull request
  • No unnecessary issues are included into this pull request.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 13, 2026

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/tutorials/3769

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 09c6bfb with merge base b415fd7 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the cla signed label Feb 13, 2026
@titaiwangms
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @justinchuby Do you think we need to specify onnx-ir?

Copy link
Contributor

@svekars svekars left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@justinchuby
Copy link
Contributor

cc @justinchuby Do you think we need to specify onnx-ir?

I think this is ok. Thanks!

@svekars svekars merged commit 24942ac into pytorch:main Feb 17, 2026
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants