Skip to content

optimize: /blog/benchmarking-http-vs-udp-overlay — rewrite title/meta, add FAQ block#156

Closed
pstayets wants to merge 1 commit into
pilot-protocol:mainfrom
pstayets:seo/optimize-benchmarking-http-vs-udp-overlay
Closed

optimize: /blog/benchmarking-http-vs-udp-overlay — rewrite title/meta, add FAQ block#156
pstayets wants to merge 1 commit into
pilot-protocol:mainfrom
pstayets:seo/optimize-benchmarking-http-vs-udp-overlay

Conversation

@pstayets

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Page: /blog/benchmarking-http-vs-udp-overlay
Before: 372 impressions, 2 clicks, position 18.8

Changes:

  • Title: 'HTTP vs UDP Overlay Networks for AI Agents: Benchmarks for Latency, Throughput & NAT' (front-loads primary query)
  • Meta description: rewritten under 155 chars with problem → deliverable structure
  • Opening paragraph: first two sentences now state the comparison directly
  • Added FAQ block (5 entries with JSON-LD for AI Overviews): UDP vs HTTP speed, NAT impact on performance, memory at scale, running HTTP over UDP overlay, benchmarking methodology
  • Internal link added to /blog/http-services-over-encrypted-overlay
  • Added entry to public/llms.txt for LLM discoverability

…, add FAQ block, update opening, link to http-services-overlay, add to llms.txt

Signed-off-by: pstayets <pstayets@users.noreply.github.com>
@TeoSlayer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing: auto-generated SEO-content PR now conflicting with the batch of content merged today. The content pipeline can regenerate against current main if still wanted.

@TeoSlayer TeoSlayer closed this Jul 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants