Dev

[TatevikGr]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated API response schema for the bounces endpoint to include pagination metadata alongside bounce items.

Thanks for contributing to phpList!

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@TatevikGr has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7c648107-ed88-44e1-a94b-98ec6975ac1b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 784bb28 and a928154.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/workflows/client-docs.yml
• .github/workflows/front-docs.yml
• composer.json
• src/Subscription/Controller/SubscribePageController.php

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The OpenAPI documentation for the GET /api/v2/bounces endpoint's 200 response was updated to reflect a different response structure. The schema changed from describing a bare array of BounceView objects to describing an object with two fields: an items array containing BounceView objects and a pagination field referencing CursorPagination. The actual controller logic and endpoint behavior remain unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title "Dev" is vague and generic, providing no meaningful information about what changed in the pull request.	Consider a more descriptive title like "Update bounce endpoint OpenAPI response schema" that clearly conveys the main change.

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch dev

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}