[github-actions]

Prepare release 0.6.0.

Plan: b158c3cf94df839d82b960d42fedeb75fb476fa8af6d42074d241c3c850725e3
Base: b01e5700939085c4ff06af2a29325b23fbbe341b
Consumed fragments: 4

Updates the changelog and removes the consumed fragments.
Preparing this PR does not publish a tag or release.
After the approved merge, the full lifecycle publishes its tag and GitHub release by default.
An explicit publish: false creates neither; later plans still continue from the consolidated history.
Older consolidations without publication are not published retroactively.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: ASSERTIVE
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 4b9ab982-7428-46c3-8732-ef7706efb0f1

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

Changelog

✅ Contribution check passed.

Head: 6e7d84547440e1445df379f31616f4d3843d95e0

Base: b01e5700939085c4ff06af2a29325b23fbbe341b

Contribution: 0 new valid fragment(s). Policy: managed-version.

[coisa]

@codex review

Please review generated version-PR HEAD f1037a54243828212fc845945b4b136fb4cf2ce9, including the consolidation's provenance and generated-only scope. The title proposes v0.5.0 to v0.5.1. No current Codex request/review was found for this HEAD. Workflow approval, successful current-head CI and the independent CodeRabbit review remain separate required gates; this request does not approve a workflow, merge the PR or authorize publication.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-27T23:27:53.019062Z	6e7d845	Manual request
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-27T23:28:35.257413Z	6e7d845	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming!

Reviewed commit: f1037a5424

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f1037a5424

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

[coisa]

@codex review

The native lifecycle regenerated this version PR after #75 merged. Please review current HEAD d8cbef50692c687f96ab425fdc6454bd64a7802a, proposing v0.5.0 to v0.6.0. Its four-path diff consolidates the three existing fragments with correct PR provenance (#75, #82, #80); the resulting source main ff88f6c has terminal successful PHP 8.3/8.4/8.5 CI. The prior f1037a5 review covered the previous 0.5.1 candidate and is not reused. No current d8cbef5 review/request was found. Human workflow approval, successful current-head CI and CodeRabbit remain separate required gates; no merge/publication is requested by this comment.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: d8cbef5069

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d8cbef5069

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

[coisa]

@codex review

The native lifecycle regenerated this version PR after #79 merged. Please review current HEAD 6e7d84547440e1445df379f31616f4d3843d95e0, still proposing v0.5.0 to v0.6.0. The five-path generated-only diff consumes exactly the four existing fragments and attributes entries to #75/#79/#82/#80. Source main b01e570 has terminal successful PHP 8.3/8.4/8.5 CI. The completed d8cbef5 reviews cover the previous candidate and are not reused; no current 6e7d845 request/review was found. The three action_required workflows and current-head CodeRabbit review remain separate gates. This request approves no workflow, merges nothing and does not authorize publication.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: 6e7d845474

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6e7d845474

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.