OCPBUGS-114874: Document filtering oc adm top pod metrics by node - #119011
OCPBUGS-114874: Document filtering oc adm top pod metrics by node#119011Pratik-Redhat-Tech wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Add an --field-selector spec.nodeName example so users can find pod usage on a node without a dedicated --node flag. Signed-off-by: Pratik Langde <plangde@redhat.com>
|
@Pratik-Redhat-Tech: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-114874, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Hi @Pratik-Redhat-Tech. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step. Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@Pratik-Redhat-Tech: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-114874, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Fixes OCPBUGS-114874
Document how to list pod CPU/memory usage on a specific node using the existing
--field-selectorflag:This is not a new
--nodeflag. Upstream kubernetes/kubernetes#141581 added--nodeand was closed because--field-selector spec.nodeName=...already covers that workflow (kubernetes/kubernetes#139107). This PR only adds the missing example so the existing flag is discoverable.Signed-off-by: Pratik Langde plangde@redhat.com
Made with Cursor