OCPEDGE-2997: Add PKI certificate inventory - #7350
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@eggfoobar: This pull request references OCPEDGE-2997 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Important Review skippedWe couldn't safely recover the incremental review. No full review was started, and the last reviewed checkpoint was preserved. Retry later, or explicitly request a full review by commenting You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 11 remain after this review. WalkthroughChangesCertificate inventory migration
Priority: ➖ Normal Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Change: Feature Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant initCerts
participant CertificateChains
participant CertificateInventory
participant LifecycleChecks
initCerts->>CertificateChains: request inventory
CertificateChains->>CertificateInventory: build ordered classified entries
CertificateInventory-->>LifecycleChecks: return paths and certificates
LifecycleChecks->>LifecycleChecks: evaluate regeneration or rotation dates
Suggested labels: Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change introduces deterministic certificate inventory traversal for regeneration and rotation checks. No current merge-readiness risk is identified. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: eggfoobar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Add a deterministic role-based inventory for certificate chains and use it for existing regeneration and rotation inspection paths. Co-Authored-By: GPT-5 <noreply@openai.com> Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
We no longer are using this function as our main collection of certs is moved over to the Inventory object. Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
8e185c6 to
edc6044
Compare
|
/retest-required |
|
/test ? |
|
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-el10 e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-el9 e2e-aws-tests |
|
@eggfoobar: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Add a deterministic role-based inventory for certificate chains and use it for existing regeneration and rotation inspection paths.
Summary by CodeRabbit