Skip to content

fix: update stale OpenFeature provider links - #1456

Open
jonathannorris wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/provider-link-fixes
Open

fix: update stale OpenFeature provider links#1456
jonathannorris wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/provider-link-fixes

Conversation

@jonathannorris

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Replace stale CloudBees, Kameleoon, and MongoDB + Rules GitHub URLs with their current destinations.
  • Update provider documentation URLs to their canonical paths.
  • Replace the obsolete GrowthBook JavaScript anchor with the dedicated OpenFeature documentation page.

Validation

  • Checked all 239 provider URLs.
  • Confirmed zero redirects after the updates.
  • Confirmed npm package links resolve through the npm registry.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Norris <jonathan.norris@dynatrace.com>
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for openfeature ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0d0a232
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/openfeature/deploys/6a7e7978895c7f0008cd0088
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1456--openfeature.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes Run an agent on this branch

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@jonathannorris, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 38 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a4867651-1a03-4278-b955-d39cea82ff37

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b3509e and 0d0a232.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • src/datasets/providers/cloudbees.ts
  • src/datasets/providers/configcat.ts
  • src/datasets/providers/datadog.ts
  • src/datasets/providers/devcycle.ts
  • src/datasets/providers/growthbook.ts
  • src/datasets/providers/kameleoon.ts
  • src/datasets/providers/mdb-rules.ts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jonathannorris
jonathannorris marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2026 02:14
@jonathannorris
jonathannorris requested review from a team as code owners August 14, 2026 02:14
@askpt
askpt added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 14, 2026
@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Aug 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants