[objectstack-fleet]

Requested by Elon · project thread

Fixes #25507

Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none

维护者速读(草稿)

• 改了什么:把您 2026-10-23 16:43–16:45Z 的三句话写进 pm-dispatch:①「我说的是业务需求上的合理性,谁来判断」+「立卡」⇒ 立卡门从三答变四答,多一栏「业务理由」(谁受益、什么场景、不做会怎样);分诊首触先读它,三个出口:清楚且合北极星方向 ⇒ 照常定级入队;缺失或站不住 ⇒ Triage: returned 退回立卡人补,卡留 finding、不入队,分诊 ⛔ 不代写、⛔ 不因此关卡;涉及产品取舍或方向不明 ⇒ needs-user-decision,由总监席按批呈您;批量立卡(一次 ≥10 张)审计评论带 Batch-of:,总监席每源抽 ≤5 张给您过目。②「分诊应该所有卡都分诊,因为有的车道在立卡的时候就打上了标签」⇒ 预贴的标签只算建议,pm:queue/priority:* 只由分诊首触落笔;与建卡同分钟出现的队列/级别标签视作未分诊;无分诊审计评论的卡不是候选、不得认领;skills 车道「finding 自分诊」的例外撤销;单车道仓(hotcrm 等)席位自己做的首触也含业务理由。③「并且立刻派发」所批的派发前核实 ⇒ 席位派发前起只读子代理核实前提(卡线程卡在交候选之前做):成立 ⇒ 派;不成立但改法明确(目标不变,只换落点或修法)⇒ 评论记改法与读数、改正文,再派;判不了 ⇒ 入决策箱,不占卡线程槽;砍范围、降级、关卡仍是卡的命运,归人工地板。
• 为什么改:现状没有人判断需求合不合理,卡的来源写什么就当什么;卡线程发现前提不成立时已经占了一个名额。两条都是您 16:43Z 起在项目聊天里点的。
• 风险与代价(含回滚):纯规则文本;filing-gate.md 64→68、dispatch-runbook.md 241→245 两处抬上限引您的原话,其余七个文件就地改、行数不变;人工决裁底线(triage-duties.md 末 26 行)逐字节未动;一次 revert 可回。要您知道的三处:(a) 本 PR 改写了 docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 一分钟前落地的一行「半标卡归所属车道席补齐」,析取 ③④ 回到分诊席,依据是您 16:44:57Z 的原话,不是静默覆盖;(b) SKILL.md 域车道「例外二」(自贴标签且三件齐 ⇒ 执行席直接认领)被撤,它不是批 Implement ObjectStack protocol specification with Zod schemas and TypeScript interfaces #3 保留的那条「例外二」(那条是门禁翻 report-only,原文未动);(c) 应用仓没有分诊席,业务理由由仓席自己在首触里读,立卡人与判断人可能是同一席,您若要独立一眼,得把分诊席扩到应用仓,那是另一张卡。
• 席位意见:席位契约复核两轮,首轮 6377274688 唯一 FAIL(全预贴卡没有 sweep 人口)已修,次轮 6377468190 在 head c9dae42 上 PASS,CI 47 项全绿;复核同时提醒:应用仓无分诊席(上面 (c))、Premise: 行未进 SKILL.md 认领模板(一行后续)、卡 pm-dispatch: after the thin 分诊席 (#25414) lands, five lines elsewhere still give triage its old duties (seat-post liveness, main-repo producer, the 析取④ reference, the release-by-triage step, central grading) #25490 派发前应重读正文(其六项中两项已被本 PR 做空)。
• 你要做的(一个动作):无。您 14:14Z 已在 Skills 席位线程授权「后续按 pm-dispatch 规则审核通过的都可以落地」;复核已 PASS、CI 全绿,现受您 2026-10-24 00:00Z「准备发版本,暂停合并新的pr」约束,解冻后由席位落地。

What changed

Nine files: eight rule-text files under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** and two ceiling rows in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs. Every edited rule line is at or under 120 bytes.

File	Before	After
references/filing-gate.md 立卡门 (64 → 68)	「POST 前正文答三件:类别 ①–④、动手的读者、查重查询与命中数(含 closed)」; ③ and ④ on two lines	四件 (类别、业务理由、动手的读者、查重查询与命中数); +5 lines: the field (who benefits, the scenario, the cost of not doing it; ③ answers with the maintainer's words, ④ inherits the parent; triage never writes it for the filer), the three triage exits (clear and on the North-Star direction ⇒ queue; missing or not holding ⇒ Triage: returned, card kept finding, re-read after the body changes, never written for them and never closed on it; a product trade-off or unclear direction ⇒ needs-user-decision, the 总监席 presents it), and the batch rule (≥10 cards at once ⇒ Batch-of: on the audit comment, the 总监席 samples ≤5 per source to the maintainer). Paid in place: ③ and ④ merged onto one line (110 bytes)
references/triage-duties.md (103 → 103)	析取 ② only; 「有 domain:* 无 pm-state,或 … 无 priority:* 的半标卡,归所属车道席补齐」 (#25422); 「自贴卡抽查:…同分钟,逐张核车道、补齐三件」; 「skills 车道 finding 由该席自分诊,全仓轮跳过」; pointer 「三答与配额见 filing-gate.md」	析取 ③ and ④ back on the triage seat with ②'s two-minute window; L17 「析取 ⑤:窗内新建且 pm:queue/priority:* 与建卡同分钟,照未分诊首触;⛔ 不凭 actor」 (the same-minute rule with its own sweep population; review fix c9dae42 after FAIL-1 of 6377274688; the 「预贴标签只是建议」 clause lives in SKILL.md L172 and execution-duties.md L9), L19 五析取 sweep; 「每张卡欠一次分诊首触,车道 ⛔ 不自分诊」; +1 line 「首触先按业务理由三出口分流,再定级路由;批量卡审计评论带 Batch-of: 行」 after the pointer, which now names 四答 and 理由判据; paid by merging 「分类动作每张三选一…」 with 「裁定写方向、给六态之一」. Lines 78–103 (裁决恒归维护者人工, 人工地板, 风险判据, 工作量判据, 不呈, 例外一/二, 请示纪律) are byte-identical to main
SKILL.md 域车道 (318, in place)	「例外二:立卡人自贴而车道合上表、正文齐立卡门三件 ⇒ 执行席直接认领,分诊事后抽查」	「预贴标签只是建议,队列与级别只由分诊落笔(例外一同承);无分诊审计评论 ⛔ 不得认领」
references/execution-duties.md 候选 (in place)	「自贴 domain:* 卡:合域表且齐立卡门三件 ⇒ 候选;缺一 ⇒ 挂 pm:retriage」	「无分诊审计评论的卡不是候选,预贴 pm:queue 视同无;例外一的 sub-issue 承父卡首触」
references/lanes/triage.md (in place)	「范围 = … 的裸卡首触(定级、路由、三件)…」	「范围 = objectstack、objectui 每张卡首触(业务理由与定级)与跨车道查重;应用仓无分诊席」
references/lanes/skills.md (in place, 2 lines)	「唯一例外:本车道 finding 自分诊,全仓轮跳过」 + the 仪器 question asked by the self-triage	the lane's findings take the triage seat's first touch like every card; the seat may attach evidence and its answer to 「仪器为车队服务」; a finding with no answer ⇒ the seat suggests p3 or not doing it, ⛔ never queues it itself; the grade stays with triage
references/cross-repo-coordination.md (in place)	「机械三务 = 自扫 sweep、自打 type、自做 finding 首触定级」	「… 自做首触(含 finding 与业务理由,判据评论同分诊)」: a single-lane repo's seat reads the business rationale in its own first touch and leaves the same audit comment
references/dispatch-runbook.md (241 → 245)	「## subagent 批派发前置:先把本地检出钉到 main」; 「sweep 析取①②」	heading renamed in place 「## 派发前置:前提核实,再把本地检出钉到 main」; +4 lines at its head: the read-only subagent at the floor tier, run for a card-thread card before the candidate is handed to the coordinator; the three exits (holds ⇒ dispatch; false with a clear fix ⇒ correct the card then dispatch; cannot judge ⇒ decision inbox, no card-thread slot); 「改法明确 = 目标不变,只换落点或修法」 with the comment that records the old premise, the reading and the change before the body edit; scope cuts, downgrades and closes are the card's fate on the human floor, and the reading lands on a Premise: claim line. 「析取①–⑤」 in place
scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs	filing-gate.md 64, dispatch-runbook.md 241	68 and 245, each row's comment quoting the maintainer's word and the measured delta; neither file is a CROSS_FILE_MOVES participant. triage-duties.md is the declared source of the director.md move (120 → 103), so its ceiling is not raised: its one new line is paid in place

Acceptance reads on this head: git grep -n '例外二' -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch → one hit, triage-duties.md L92 (the report-only valve batch #3 kept); git grep -n '自分诊' -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch → two hits, both ⛔ lines; git grep -n '三件' -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch → 出处三件 lines and filing-gate.md L30 「可推三件」 (the three answers triage may derive; the business rationale is the one it may not); git diff main -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md | grep '^[-+]' | grep -c '人工地板\|风险判据\|工作量判据' → 0.

Line budget

File	Lines	Ceiling	Net
references/filing-gate.md	68	68 (was 64)	+4 (+5 −1), ruled raise
references/triage-duties.md	103	103	0 (+1 −1, 7 edited in place)
references/dispatch-runbook.md	245	245 (was 241)	+4, ruled raise; 2 edited in place
SKILL.md	318	318	0 (1 edited in place)
references/execution-duties.md	188	188	0 (1 edited in place; 187 → 188 is #25474's)
references/lanes/triage.md	7	7	0 (1 edited in place)
references/lanes/skills.md	32	33	0 (2 edited in place)
references/cross-repo-coordination.md	51	51	0 (1 edited in place)

The two raises are ordinary ruled raises under the ratchet header's maintainer exit: the ruling of record is the maintainer's word of 2026-10-23 quoted verbatim on card #25507 (「我说的是业务需求上的合理性，谁来判断」, 「立卡」, 「并且立刻派发」, 「而且分诊应该所有卡都分诊，因为有的车道在立卡的时候就打上了标签」) and in the seat's claim, comment 6370029859 (corrected by 6370094728); measured deltas +4 and +4, each row moved by exactly that. Paying them by deletion was tried first: every bullet pair in both files that would merge under 120 bytes was measured, one merge per file was available and both were taken; the remaining lines are the rule text the word orders. Widest edited line 120 bytes (filing-gate.md 四件 line).

Gates

On head c9dae42 (the rule commit 7a21474, the main merge 2ab989f that brings #25474 and #25506 in, which touches execution-duties.md and dispatch-runbook.md in hunks this PR's diff does not, and the review fix c9dae42 for FAIL-1 of contract review 6377274688: a card filed with domain:* + pm:queue + priority:* in the same minute matched none of disjuncts ①–④, so triage-duties.md L17 now names 析取 ⑤ 「窗内新建且 pm:queue/priority:* 与建卡同分钟,照未分诊首触;⛔ 不凭 actor」, L19 五析取, dispatch-runbook.md L64 析取①–⑤, all in place, 103/103 and 245/245 held), each exit code captured before any pipe:

• The four the card names: pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet ✓ (self-test green; filing-gate.md 68/68, triage-duties.md 103/103, dispatch-runbook.md 245/245, SKILL.md 318/318, execution-duties.md 188/188, lanes/triage.md 7/7, lanes/skills.md 32/33, cross-repo-coordination.md 51/51; the director.md move still reads +17 against its source's −17), pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint ✓, pnpm check:skill-frame-sync ✓, pnpm check:skill-frame-freshness ✓. Also pnpm check:pm-governed-prose ✓ and node scripts/check-commit-card-trailers.mjs --range origin/main..HEAD ✓, all re-run after the main merge.
• node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack <the nine changed paths> derives 52 commands (the ratchet script's path pulls in the scripts roster families). After pnpm install --frozen-lockfile: 47 × exit 0; 3 × exit 2 (check-closing-target-claim, check-partof-closing-keyword, check-single-claim-paths: usage exits, they read a PR number or body from CI's environment; check-partof-closing-keyword re-run with this body as PR_BODY exits 0); 2 × exit 3 (check:dts-closure, check:published-readme-exports: PREREQUISITE, they read built dist/, which this card's text does not touch and this thread did not build). CI's check-runs on this head are the record either way.
• No published package moves (.claude/** and one ceiling file), so skip-changeset.

Ordering and open PRs

• Built on main after docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 (card pm-dispatch: Tier S PR landed from a project needs a contract-review record by another account; triage shrinks to bare cards in the director project; decision cards stay in their repo, the director scans every repo (maintainer's word 2026-10-23) #25414) and docs(pm-dispatch): the Writes: line names the relay as the only GitHub write path and bans GitHub MCP writes by name; the card thread's opening message carries it verbatim; contract review notes a PR not authored by the fleet bot #25474 (card pm-dispatch: card threads write to GitHub only through the relay (pr_create and the other ops), never GitHub MCP; the dispatch order carries that line verbatim; review flags a PR not authored by the fleet bot (maintainer's word 2026-10-23) #25457) landed; main merged in at 2ab989f (clean, no conflict). docs(pm-dispatch): the Writes: line names the relay as the only GitHub write path and bans GitHub MCP writes by name; the card thread's opening message carries it verbatim; contract review notes a PR not authored by the fleet bot #25474's hunks (execution-duties.md 派发 L121–L130, dispatch-runbook.md 〈卡线程〉 L140) and this PR's (execution-duties.md L9, dispatch-runbook.md L64 and L149–L153) do not touch.
• Card pm-dispatch: after the thin 分诊席 (#25414) lands, five lines elsewhere still give triage its old duties (seat-post liveness, main-repo producer, the 析取④ reference, the release-by-triage step, central grading) #25490 (queued, five stale triage lines in seat-post-protocol.md, seat-lifecycle.md, cross-repo-coordination.md L7) shares cross-repo-coordination.md with this PR; this PR edits L10 only.
• The claim's file surface was widened by comment 6370094728 to the three in-place lines the 「所有卡都分诊」 rule needs (execution-duties.md L9, lanes/skills.md L22–L23, cross-repo-coordination.md L10); nothing outside the widened surface is touched.

Acceptance notes

• Supersedes one line of docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 and one of batch Implement ObjectStack protocol specification with Zod schemas and TypeScript interfaces #3's untouched context, on the maintainer's later word. docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 (landed 16:46Z) sent the half-labelled disjuncts ③④ to the owning lane seat; the maintainer's 16:44:57Z sentence orders every card through triage, so ③④ return to the triage seat and the 自贴卡 spot-check becomes the rule. SKILL.md 域车道 例外二 (self-labelled ⇒ direct claim) is withdrawn for the same reason; it is not the triage-duties.md 例外二 (the report-only valve) that batch Implement ObjectStack protocol specification with Zod schemas and TypeScript interfaces #3 item 1.2 kept, which is byte-identical. Both are said here so the reviewer can hold them against the word, not discover them.
• The Premise: claim line is prescribed in the runbook but not yet in the SKILL.md claim template (318/318, no line in the file merges under 120 bytes). The claim-reading gates read only Branch:/Clause-②:/Metadata-protocol:, so an extra line is legal today; the template line is a one-line follow-up for the seat when SKILL.md next has a line to pay.
• Single-lane repos have no triage seat (cross-repo-coordination.md, docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422): their repo:* seat reads the business rationale in its own first touch, so filer and judge can be the same seat there. Named in the 速读 for the maintainer; widening the triage seat to app repos would be its own card.
• A returned card is kept finding, the label the state model already defines as 「待首次定级」, instead of a new label: it keeps the card out of the queue and the inbox and inside the finding round, which re-reads it only after the body changes. sweep-stale-finding.mjs strips finding only from cards that already carry a grade, so a returned card is never swept.
• The body's first line is the HTML-comment attribution block the project session requires; os-dev.md 〈干净收尾〉 forbids HTML comments in GitHub text. Reported as a deviation, not hidden.
• The commit carries the model-free trailer pair the pre-push hook requires and no card trailer; the card relation is this body's Fixes line only.
• Opened through the fleet-write relay pr_create, so the author is objectstack-fleet[bot]; every later write to this PR goes through the relay too.
• Governed surface .claude/** (Tier S): draft, awaiting the seat's CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review; landing by the seat under the maintainer's 14:14Z standing word in the skills seat thread; ⛔ not to be flipped ready, queued or armed by this thread.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_014kfbihfYYkWDWee41PM2Gn

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 2ab989f1aa1a5f88fc6eb15998c7d7aaaad029c6
Local-runs: probe — the four gates the card names (check-skill-line-ratchet, check-skill-id-lint, check-skill-frame-sync, check-skill-frame-freshness) plus check-governed-merges.mjs --test and check-governed-prose.mjs were run once on a detached read-only worktree of this head, because the brief asks for the ratchet exit code and the Tier predicate and the CI jobs carrying them were still in progress when the diff was read; CI's check-runs on this head are the record, the probes only agree with it
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, references/filing-gate.md, references/triage-duties.md, references/lanes/triage.md, references/lanes/skills.md, references/dispatch-runbook.md, references/execution-duties.md, references/cross-repo-coordination.md + scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (the gate that enforces the ceilings the rule text moved, read as one change) + the floor it must not touch: triage-duties.md L78–L103 on main

Written 2026-10-24T00:07Z by an isolated contract-review subagent of domain:skills seat 2. Inputs: card #25507 (the maintainer's words of 2026-10-23 16:43–16:44Z and Wanted 1–4), claim 6370029859 and addendum 6370094728, git diff origin/main...2ab989f1aa (origin/main 19d3720af1 read 2026-10-23T23:58Z), the head's check-runs (read 2026-10-24T00:06Z), contract-review.md and review-checklist.md on main. The PR body's self-assessment was not an input to the judgments; its three quick-read watch points (a) (b) (c) were read and are judged under ③.

① Derived judgments

Wanted 1 — 「业务理由」 on every card (filing-gate.md). L24 「POST 前正文答四件:类别、业务理由、动手的读者(哪席哪步)、查重查询与命中数(含已关)」 and L25 「业务理由:谁受益、什么场景、不做会怎样;③ 以原话代,④ 承父单;分诊 ⛔ 不代写」 carry the field and its three parts as the card words them (who benefits / scenario / cost of not doing). Seat-filed and audit-filed cards are not exempted anywhere; ③ answers with the maintainer's own words and ④ inherits the parent, which is the only sensible reading for those two classes. PASS.

Wanted 2 — the 分诊席 judges it. lanes/triage.md L5 scope now reads 「每张卡首触(业务理由与定级)」; triage-duties.md L34 points at 「四答、理由判据」 in filing-gate.md and L35 orders the read 「首触先按业务理由三出口分流,再定级路由」. The three exits in filing-gate.md L26–L28 match the card exactly: clear and on the North-Star direction ⇒ 照常定级入队; missing or not holding ⇒ Triage: returned 退回立卡人, 留 finding, re-read after the body changes, 「⛔ 不代写不关卡」 (the card stays open — the ⛔ the card and claim both demand: the 分诊席 never closes a card on business grounds); product trade-off or unclear direction ⇒ needs-user-decision 入箱, 总监席呈批, 「⛔ 不替维护者判需求」 (that inbox is 「待决策汇总」). Audit batches: L29 「批量立卡(一次 ≥10 张):审计评论带 Batch-of: 行,总监席每源抽 ≤5 张呈维护者过目」 — a sample, not every card. The pre-existing close path L31 (「补不齐(四类皆非)者才因缺件首触即关 not_planned」) is untouched and closes on category, not on business grounds. Triage: returned is read by check-half-states.mjs's isTriageRulingComment on the Triage: prefix, so it counts as the audit comment the other new lines require. PASS.

Wanted 3 — premise check before dispatch (dispatch-runbook.md). L150–L153 under the renamed heading 「派发前置:前提核实,再把本地检出钉到 main」: a read-only subagent at the floor tier, for a card-thread card run 「在交候选给 coordinator 之前」; 「成立 ⇒ 派;不成立而改法明确 ⇒ 改卡再派;判不了 ⇒ 入决策箱,⛔ 不占卡线程槽」; 「改法明确 = 目标不变,只换落点或修法:评论记原前提、读数与改法,再改正文」 (the comment the card asks for); and 「砍范围、降级、关卡是卡的命运,归人工地板 ⛔ 不借改卡裁;读数落认领 Premise: 行」. The three exits and the no-slot rule are the proposal's words 「核实成立就派;不成立、但改法明确的,就改卡后再派;判断不了的,转决策,不占卡线程名额」 as the maintainer answered them with 「立卡」 and 「并且立刻派发」. PASS.

Wanted 4 — the human floor. triage-duties.md L75–L103 on this head are byte-identical to origin/main (diff of the two ranges is empty); the floor proper begins L78 「裁决恒归维护者人工」 and runs through the 人工地板 / 风险判据 / 工作量判据 / 不呈 / 例外一二 / 请示纪律 lines to L103. 「必须人工决裁」 (lanes/director.md L22) is untouched. The new lines point at the floor rather than restating it: runbook L154 「归人工地板」, filing-gate.md L27 「⛔ 不代写不关卡」 and L28 「⛔ 不替维护者判需求」. No ruling path is reopened to a seat: every new exit ends in the queue, the filer, or the decision inbox. PASS.

The addendum — 「而且分诊应该所有卡都分诊,因为有的车道在立卡的时候就打上了标签。」 The rewrite of PR #25422's line 「有 domain:* 无 pm-state,或有 pm:queue+domain:* 无 priority:* 的半标卡,归所属车道席补齐」 into 析取 ③ and ④ on the triage seat (triage-duties.md L14–L15, with ②'s two-minute window; runbook L64 「析取①②③④」) is exactly what that word requires: a half-labelled card is a lane-labelled card, and the word puts every such card through triage. 析取 ④ returns with the same definition it had before #25422 (pm:queue + domain:*, no priority:*). The rest of #25422's thin-triage settlement is intact on this head: lanes/triage.md L4 「只写标签与审计评论,⛔ 无 PR、无认领」, two repos 「objectstack、objectui」, 「应用仓无分诊席」, one seat and the fire cadence (L6–L7) — none silently reversed. The supporting lines are in scope and consistent: SKILL.md L172 「预贴标签只是建议,队列与级别只由分诊落笔(例外一同承);无分诊审计评论 ⛔ 不得认领」; execution-duties.md L9 「无分诊审计评论的卡不是候选,预贴 pm:queue 视同无;例外一的 sub-issue 承父卡首触」; lanes/skills.md L22–L23 withdraw the lane's self-triage (both remaining 「自分诊」 hits on the tree are ⛔ lines); triage-duties.md L74 「每张卡欠一次分诊首触,车道 ⛔ 不自分诊」; cross-repo-coordination.md L10 extends a single-lane seat's first touch to 「含 finding 与业务理由,判据评论同分诊」.

FAIL-1 — the fully pre-labelled card has no finder. triage-duties.md L17 「预贴标签只是建议:pm:queue/priority:* 与建卡同分钟 ⇒ 视作未分诊首触;⛔ 不凭 actor」 states the rule for the card the maintainer's sentence is about, but no sweep population lists that card: a card filed with domain:* + pm:queue + priority:* in the same minute matches none of 析取 ①–④ (① needs no labels, ② no domain:*, ③ no pm-state, ④ no priority:*), and the line this one replaces on main carried the finder 「窗内新建」 that the rewrite dropped. execution-duties.md L9 and SKILL.md L172 refuse the card as a candidate for want of an audit comment, so under this head such a card is neither triaged nor claimable until a human notices — the opposite of 「所有卡都分诊」. One in-place fix, net 0 lines, 115 bytes, no ceiling move: rewrite L17 to 「- 预贴标签只是建议:pm:queue/priority:* 与建卡同分钟 ⇒ 入析取①照首触;⛔ 不凭 actor。」 (or any wording that names which sweep population carries it). Fixable by the card thread on this branch; the record is re-rendered on the new head.

Budgets and surface. Every touched rule file is at or under its ceiling row on this head: SKILL.md 318/318, filing-gate.md 68/68 (was 64), triage-duties.md 103/103, dispatch-runbook.md 245/245 (was 241), execution-duties.md 188/188, lanes/triage.md 7/7, lanes/skills.md 32/33, cross-repo-coordination.md 51/51. The widest added line is 120 bytes (filing-gate.md L24); none exceeds 120. No login appears in any added line. Ratchet exit 0 (self-test 164 cases; cross-file moves 3; total ceilings down 488), id-lint exit 0 (87 files clean), frame-sync and frame-freshness exit 0, governed-prose exit 0. The file surface is the claim's plus the addendum's three files, with one deviation recorded under ③ (SKILL.md). No Tier H path is touched: check-governed-merges.mjs --test on the nine paths returns .claude/** ×8 as the only register hits (Tier S) and scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs as off-register; size 73 lines, under the 3000-line lift.

Merge. The head is a merge commit whose second parent is current origin/main (19d3720af1); git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main 2ab989f1aa is conflict-free, and the merge commit's tree equals git merge-tree of its two parents (1ff3c6c988…), so the merge reproduces. Against origin/main the diff is exactly the nine files, +51/−22.

Check-runs on this head (read 2026-10-24T00:06Z): 50 check runs, all completed — 32 success, 18 skipped, 0 failed, 0 pending. Both required jobs are success (Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check), as are Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Governed Surface Queue Guard, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, No other open PR may claim the same issue, Check Changeset, and Test Core 1/6–6/6. Green across the board; the verdict below fails on rule content, not on CI.

② Semver level

No published package is touched (.claude/** and one scripts/pm/** gate); skip-changeset is the right form for this repository and the label is on the PR. Clause-②: no and Metadata-protocol: none are correct: rule text and two ceiling integers widen no accept set and no public surface. PASS.

③ Boundary flags

• Same-account review (the ③ note for a PR whose author is not the reviewing account's own). PR author is objectstack-fleet[bot] (relay pr_create); the body's attribution github_login is os-elon-musk, the same account as Reviewed-by-account: below. Under contract-review.md this record is therefore a review, not by itself the Tier S landing record; the ① substitute under the interim line is the maintainer's standing Tier S word for this seat (2026-10-23 14:14Z, 「后续按 pm-dispatch 规则审核通过的都可以落地」). Nothing here flips, queues or arms the PR.
• Watch point (a), judged: the rewrite of docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422's 半标卡 line is required by the 16:44:57Z word and reverses nothing else of docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 (see ①). Agreed, not a silent override.
• Watch point (b), judged: the SKILL.md 例外二 withdrawn is L172 (self-labelled ⇒ direct claim), not the triage-duties.md 例外二 kept by director batch Implement ObjectStack protocol specification with Zod schemas and TypeScript interfaces #3 item 1.2 (L92–L93, byte-identical). Agreed. Surface deviation noted: the claim admits SKILL.md 「only if a line is paid in the same file」, and this edit is a rule change, not a payment; the addendum did not name it. The word makes the withdrawal unavoidable (an exception that lets a lane skip triage contradicts 「所有卡都分诊」) and the body declares it, so this is recorded, not failed; the seat should add a one-line claim addendum naming SKILL.md L172 so the in-flight file-surface check reads true.
• Watch point (c), for the maintainer: single-lane repos (hotcrm, cloud, objectos, …) have no 分诊席 (docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422), so cross-repo-coordination.md L10 has the repo:* seat read the business rationale in its own first touch — filer and judge can be the same seat there. That is the consequence of 「应用仓无分诊席」, outside this card's scope; widening the 分诊席 to app repos would be its own card.
• Ceiling raises are a floor class. filing-gate.md 64 → 68 and dispatch-runbook.md 241 → 245 are 「抬上限」, a human-floor item under ruling 6356061991; they rest on the maintainer's words of the day (「立卡」, 「并且立刻派发」) quoted in the rows and on the standing Tier S word. Named so the maintainer sees it, as the floor asks.
• Premise: claim line is prescribed in the runbook but not yet in the SKILL.md claim template (318/318); the claim-reading checkers read only Branch: / Clause-②: / Metadata-protocol: / Container & model:, so an extra line is legal; one-line follow-up when SKILL.md next has a line to pay.
• PR body vs head: every line count and ceiling in the body matches this head; acceptance greps reproduce (「例外二」 one hit at triage-duties.md L92; 「自分诊」 two ⛔ hits). One imprecision: the body says the main merge 「changes none of the nine files」 — the merge brings main's docs(pm-dispatch): the Writes: line names the relay as the only GitHub write path and bans GitHub MCP writes by name; the card thread's opening message carries it verbatim; contract review notes a PR not authored by the fleet bot #25474/refactor(pm): fleet-roster reads the mailbox constants from mailbox-open #25506 hunks into dispatch-runbook.md and execution-duties.md, two of the nine; the PR's own diff against main is unchanged by it. The body's first line is the project attribution HTML comment, declared as a deviation.
• Overlap with card pm-dispatch: after the thin 分诊席 (#25414) lands, five lines elsewhere still give triage its old duties (seat-post liveness, main-repo producer, the 析取④ reference, the release-by-triage step, central grading) #25490 (queued). This PR edits cross-repo-coordination.md L10 only and leaves seat-post-protocol.md and seat-lifecycle.md untouched. Of pm-dispatch: after the thin 分诊席 (#25414) lands, five lines elsewhere still give triage its old duties (seat-post liveness, main-repo producer, the 析取④ reference, the release-by-triage step, central grading) #25490's six items, two are made moot by this head: seat-lifecycle.md L76 「析取④」 (the disjunct exists again with its pre-docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 meaning) and cross-repo-coordination.md L7 「中央分诊是 domain:*/type/定级的唯一生产者」 (true again once ③④ return to triage and 「队列与级别只由分诊落笔」). Four remain for pm-dispatch: after the thin 分诊席 (#25414) lands, five lines elsewhere still give triage its old duties (seat-post liveness, main-repo producer, the 析取④ reference, the release-by-triage step, central grading) #25490: seat-post-protocol.md L28 (liveness → 总监席 digest) and L80 (「主仓归分诊座位」), seat-lifecycle.md L39 (「由分诊一笔中继释放」), and the check-half-states.mjs prescription string. pm-dispatch: after the thin 分诊席 (#25414) lands, five lines elsewhere still give triage its old duties (seat-post liveness, main-repo producer, the 析取④ reference, the release-by-triage step, central grading) #25490's body should be re-read before dispatch — the premise check this PR prescribes.
• Dev-side open questions: none flagged in the PR body beyond the items above.

Implemented-by: claude/project-thread-5m809k
Reviewed-by: session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM
Reviewed-by-account: os-elon-musk

VERDICT: FAIL — one item, FAIL-1 (the fully pre-labelled card has no sweep population), fixable in place on this branch; everything else PASS. A fresh record is owed on the fixed head.

[objectstack-fleet]

Reply to contract review 6377274688 (VERDICT FAIL on FAIL-1 only).

FAIL-1 fixed on head c9dae4256c4ed54964695bf0ec8ce9354a1a8f83. The fully pre-labelled card (domain:* + pm:queue + priority:* applied in the minute of filing) matched none of disjuncts ①–④, so the same-minute rule had no finder. It now has one:

• references/triage-duties.md L17: 「析取 ⑤:窗内新建且 pm:queue/priority:* 与建卡同分钟,照未分诊首触;⛔ 不凭 actor。」 (rewritten in place; the 「预贴标签只是建议」 clause it replaces is carried by SKILL.md L172 and execution-duties.md L9)
• references/triage-duties.md L19: 四析取 → 五析取 sweep
• references/dispatch-runbook.md L64: 「sweep 析取①–⑤ = list_issues + since」

Line budget unchanged: triage-duties.md 103/103, dispatch-runbook.md 245/245; L78–103 of triage-duties.md still byte-identical to main. Local gates on this head: ratchet, id-lint, frame-sync, freshness, governed-prose, commit-trailers all exit 0. PR body's Gates section updated to name this head and to correct the earlier sentence about the main merge (it does bring #25474's hunks into two of the nine files; this PR's own hunks are unchanged).

A fresh CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER record on this head is owed by the seat; the claim addendum naming SKILL.md L172 that the review asks for is the seat's to post. This thread does not flip ready, queue or arm.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: c9dae4256c4ed54964695bf0ec8ce9354a1a8f83
Local-runs: none
Scope: delta review of git diff 2ab989f1aa..c9dae4256c (two files, +3/−3: references/triage-duties.md L17 and L19, references/dispatch-runbook.md L64) against the FAIL-1 record 6377274688, plus the floor it must not touch (triage-duties.md L75–L103 on main), the merge onto current origin/main, and the PR body

Written 2026-10-24T00:23Z by an isolated contract-review subagent of domain:skills seat 2 — a fresh record on the fixed head, as 6377274688 said was owed. Inputs: record 6377274688 (head 2ab989f1aa, read in full), card #25507 and the maintainer's word 「而且分诊应该所有卡都分诊，因为有的车道在立卡的时候就打上了标签。」, claim 6370029859 with addenda 6370094728 and 6377295819 (read 2026-10-24T00:09Z, its posting time), git diff 2ab989f1aa..c9dae4256c (branch head fetched 2026-10-24T00:09:41Z), git diff origin/main...c9dae4256c (origin/main 45f996231e, fast-forwarded in the local clone 2026-10-24T00:00:53Z and unchanged on re-fetch), the head's check-runs (read 2026-10-24T00:22:33Z), the PR body as it stands. The PR body's self-assessment was not an input to the judgments. No local gate was run: the delta is three rule lines rewritten in place (no file changes length, no ceiling moves, no script touched), so CI's check-runs on this head are the record and the probes of 6377274688 on the prior head stand for everything the delta does not reach.

① Derived judgments

Carried forward by reference. Wanted 1 (filing-gate.md 四答 and the 业务理由 field), Wanted 2 (the 分诊席's three exits, Triage: returned, 「⛔ 不代写不关卡」, 「⛔ 不替维护者判需求」, the Batch-of: sample), Wanted 3 (the runbook's 派发前置 with its three exits and 「⛔ 不占卡线程槽」), Wanted 4 (the human floor) and the addendum's 析取 ③④ return to the triage seat were each judged PASS in 6377274688 on 2ab989f1aa. The delta touches none of the lines those judgments rest on: filing-gate.md, SKILL.md, execution-duties.md, lanes/triage.md, lanes/skills.md, cross-repo-coordination.md and the ratchet script are byte-identical between the two heads (git diff --stat 2ab989f1aa..c9dae4256c names only triage-duties.md and dispatch-runbook.md), and in those two files only the three lines below move. Those judgments stand unchanged.

FAIL-1 — closed. The fully pre-labelled card now has a finder. triage-duties.md L17 reads 「- 析取 ⑤:窗内新建且 pm:queue/priority:* 与建卡同分钟,照未分诊首触;⛔ 不凭 actor。」 in place of the prior head's 「预贴标签只是建议:… ⇒ 视作未分诊首触;⛔ 不凭 actor」. Traced through the seat's duties: a card filed with domain:* + pm:queue + priority:* in the same minute still matches none of 析取 ①–④ (unchanged L13–L15), but it is 「窗内新建」 with queue/grade labels in the minute of filing, so it matches ⑤; L12 「Backlog sweep 是常设职责,每 fire 扫任一析取命中的卡」 puts every disjunct hit in the sweep; L19 now reads 「首触定级与五析取 sweep 每 fire 跑到清空」 and runbook L64 「小时层三读法之一,sweep 析取①–⑤ = list_issues + since」, so the hourly since window (L8) enumerates ⑤ with the other four and runs it to empty; the daily full reconciliation (L10, runbook L69) re-reads both repos in full. The seat's first touch leaves the 分诊审计评论, after which execution-duties.md L9 「无分诊审计评论的卡不是候选,预贴 pm:queue 视同无」 and SKILL.md L172 「无分诊审计评论 ⛔ 不得认领」 admit the card as a candidate. The two refusals and the one finder now meet: no card is left neither triaged nor claimable, which is what 「所有卡都分诊」 requires. The 「窗内新建」 finder is the one main's own 自贴卡抽查 line carried (main L17 「自贴卡抽查:窗内新建且 domain:* 事件与建卡同分钟…」), so ⑤ restores a reach the tree had, widened from domain:* events to the pm:queue/priority:* labels the maintainer's sentence is about. 「⛔ 不凭 actor」 is kept. PASS.

The delta is the fix and nothing else. Three lines, all in place, net 0 in each file: L17 (the fix), L19 「四析取」→「五析取」 and runbook L64 「析取①②③④」→「析取①–⑤」 are the two enumerations of the disjuncts that the new numbering obliges; no other rule text moves. The one remaining enumeration on the tree, seat-lifecycle.md L76 「sweep 析取①,未定级数另计析取④」, names ① and ④ singly and stays true (git grep 析取 on the head: ten hits, none stale; 「四析取」 and 「①②③④」 have no hit). The head is a single commit on 2ab989f1aa with no new main merge, so there is no merge to reproduce inside the delta. Commit trailers are the model-free pair; no model identifier, no login in any added line.

Budgets and surface. triage-duties.md 103/103, dispatch-runbook.md 245/245 (the two files the delta touches); SKILL.md 318/318, filing-gate.md 68/68, execution-duties.md 188/188, lanes/triage.md 7/7, lanes/skills.md 32/33, cross-repo-coordination.md 51/51 unchanged from the prior head. The widest rewritten line is 110 bytes (L17); none exceeds 120. The human floor triage-duties.md L75–L103 is byte-identical to origin/main (diff of the two ranges is empty), as on the prior head. No ceiling moves, so the ratchet rows are the prior head's (filing-gate.md 68, dispatch-runbook.md 245) and the ruled-raise judgment carries. File surface: the claim's (6370029859 as widened by 6370094728 and 6377295819); the delta adds no file. No Tier H path: the same nine paths as the prior head, .claude/** ×8 (Tier S) and the ratchet script off-register.

Merge. origin/main has moved by one commit since the prior record (19d3720af1 → 45f996231e, #25541, 37 files, none under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** or scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs). git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main c9dae4256c is conflict-free (tree a5b6773107); in that tree triage-duties.md is byte-identical to the head's file, 103 lines, and dispatch-runbook.md, SKILL.md, filing-gate.md read 245/318/68. Against origin/main the PR's diff is still exactly the nine files, +51/−22.

Check-runs on this head (read 2026-10-24T00:22:33Z, polled every ~2 minutes from 2026-10-24T00:12:24Z until none was in progress): 47 check runs, all completed — 35 success, 12 skipped, 0 failed, 0 pending. Both required jobs are success (Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check), as are Lint · PM dispatch-gates (the job carrying the ratchet, id-lint, frame-sync and frame-freshness gates the card names), Lint · repo & tooling gates, Governed Surface Queue Guard, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, No other open PR may claim the same issue, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path, Part-of PR must not also close its card, every Lint · and Type Check · job, and Test Core 1/6–6/6; Check Changeset is skipped under the skip-changeset label. Green across the board.

② Semver level

Unchanged from 6377274688: no published package is touched; skip-changeset is on the PR; Clause-②: no, Metadata-protocol: none are correct. PASS.

③ Boundary flags

• Same-account review. As in 6377274688: PR author objectstack-fleet[bot], body attribution os-elon-musk, the same account as Reviewed-by-account: below; this record is a review, not by itself the Tier S landing record; the ① substitute is the maintainer's standing Tier S word for this seat (2026-10-23 14:14Z). Nothing here flips, queues or arms the PR. A release freeze is in force (the maintainer's 「准备发版本，暂停合并新的pr」): this record is a review record only and asks for no merge.
• ③-3 (SKILL.md L172 outside the claim's surface) — closed. Claim addendum 6377295819 on pm-dispatch: every card carries a business rationale the 分诊席 judges (clear → queue, missing → back to filer, product trade-off → decision), and a seat verifies a card's premise before dispatch (maintainer's word 2026-10-23) #25507 names .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md L172 「rewritten in place, line-neutral」 and ties it to the maintainer's word; the in-flight file-surface check now reads true.
• Carried forward, standing: watch points (a) and (b) agreed; (c) for the maintainer (single-lane repos have no 分诊席, filer and judge can be the same seat there — its own card); the two ceiling raises as a floor class under ruling 6356061991, resting on the maintainer's words of the day and the standing Tier S word; the Premise: claim line not yet in the SKILL.md claim template (legal today; one-line follow-up); overlap with card pm-dispatch: after the thin 分诊席 (#25414) lands, five lines elsewhere still give triage its old duties (seat-post liveness, main-repo producer, the 析取④ reference, the release-by-triage step, central grading) #25490 (two of its six items made moot, four remain, re-read its body before dispatch).
• PR body vs head — stale in three places, counts true. The body's 「What changed」 row for triage-duties.md still quotes the prior head's L17 「预贴标签只是建议:pm:queue/priority:* 与建卡同分钟 ⇒ 视作未分诊首触」, its dispatch-runbook.md row still says 「析取①②③④」 in place, and its Gates section still names head 7a21474 with 2ab989f as the merge on top; this head's 析取 ⑤ and the two renumbered lines appear nowhere in the body. The 速读's substance (「与建卡同分钟出现的队列/级别标签视作未分诊」) still holds, every line count and ceiling in the Line budget table matches this head, and the acceptance greps reproduce (「例外二」 one hit at triage-duties.md L92; 「自分诊」 two ⛔ hits). Recorded for the card thread to refresh the three cells on the branch's own body edit; not a FAIL, as the body is not an input to ①.
• ⑤'s reach is the hourly window plus the daily full pass. 「窗内新建」 ties ⑤ to the since window (L8, anchor = the seat's last 收班简报); L20's resume-from-label-state has no label that distinguishes a ⑤ card from a triaged one, so a ⑤ card the window did not reach is caught by the daily full reconciliation (L10) rather than the next hourly fire. That is the reach main's 自贴卡抽查 line already had, so it is named, not failed; if a ⑤ card is observed to wait a day, a label-free breakpoint for ⑤ is a one-line follow-up.
• Dev-side open questions: none flagged in the PR body beyond the items above.

Implemented-by: claude/project-thread-5m809k
Reviewed-by: session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM
Reviewed-by-account: os-elon-musk

VERDICT: PASS — FAIL-1 of 6377274688 is closed on this head, ③-3 is closed by addendum 6377295819, every prior PASS item stands by reference, and CI is green. Under the release freeze this record authorises nothing; landing waits for the freeze to lift and goes by the standing Tier S word.

[objectstack-fleet]

席位核对

ACCEPT · domain:skills#2 · os-elon-musk · session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM · 2026-10-24T00:39Z · head c9dae4256c4ed54964695bf0ec8ce9354a1a8f83 · Tier S (.claude/** ×8 and the ratchet ceiling file; no Tier H path)

Landing authority: the maintainer's standing Tier S word in this seat's thread of the Claude Code project "Objectstack" (os-elon-musk account), 2026-10-23T14:14Z: 「后续按 pm-dispatch 规则审核通过的都可以落地」 (the ① substitute under contract-review.md's interim line). The merge freeze he set at 2026-10-24T00:00Z was lifted at 2026-10-24T00:09Z: 「暂时停止发版本，车队可以继续开发。」 The two ceiling raises (record ③-5, a floor class) were put to him separately and he chose 「同意抬上限,直接落地」 in this seat's thread at 2026-10-24T00:39Z.

1. Shape: draft, base main, Fixes #25507 the only closing keyword, skip-changeset; author objectstack-fleet[bot] (relay-opened).
2. Premise measured: the card and claim quote the maintainer's words of 2026-10-23 16:43–16:44Z, including 「而且分诊应该所有卡都分诊…」 (claim addenda 6370094728, 6377295819).
3. Gates (check-runs pinned to this head): 54 check-runs, all completed, none failed.
4. Contract review: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER FAIL on 2ab989f1 (6377274688, FAIL-1 sweep population for a pre-labelled card) and PASS on this head (6377468190, FAIL-1 closed via 析取 ⑤).
5. Accepted deviations: ceilings dispatch-runbook.md 241→245 and filing-gate.md 64→68 (ruled as above); SKILL.md L172 rewrite named by addendum 6377295819; PR docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422's 半标卡 line rewritten per the 16:44Z word, its thin-triage settlement otherwise intact.
6. Carried: card pm-dispatch: after the thin 分诊席 (#25414) lands, five lines elsewhere still give triage its old duties (seat-post liveness, main-repo producer, the 析取④ reference, the release-by-triage step, central grading) #25490 rescoped (comment 6377494099: two items moot, Premise: template line added); app-repo filer-as-judge raised as card pm-dispatch: in an app repo with no 分诊席 the seat that files a card also judges its 业务理由 — who is the independent reader there? (from the #25507 review, 2026-10-24) #25558 to the maintainer.
7. Landing: merges cleanly onto main 041a120b61 (git merge-tree, no conflict). This seat flips ready and arms auto-merge now.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-elon-musk]

Ruling: batch #11 item 1 · letter D（去掉「另一账户复审」规则；非简报的 A/B/C）· maintainer 「A」2026-10-24T01:16:14Z → 「守卫在合并队列里只认「另一账户复审」，这个没必要，去掉这条规则」01:16:45Z 「立skills卡」01:16:51Z

维护者在 待决策汇总 线程先回「A」，30 秒后改为上面两句，以后两句为准：项目线程 Tier S 的复审记录不再要求来自 PR 作者以外的账户，队列守卫的独立性判定整条去掉，不是加一条机读授权支路。

去掉的是哪条（本席读数，供 Skills 席立卡核对）：

• 规则文 .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md（main 041a120）：L38「项目席落地的 Tier S：Reviewed-by: 须属 PR 作者外的账户；同账户子代理只算复核」、L39 的 Reviewed-by-account: 必带、L40「只动散文面…同欠另一账户一条 TIER_DEFAULT 记录」、L43「① 在项目席另加：…须异于 PR attribution 的登录，队列守卫同判」、L44–45 过渡条款（随之失效）。L35 的会话独立性（Implemented-by: ≠ Reviewed-by:）不属于这条规则，保留。来源：卡 pm-dispatch: Tier S PR landed from a project needs a contract-review record by another account; triage shrinks to bare cards in the director project; decision cards stay in their repo, the director scans every repo (maintainer's word 2026-10-23) #25414 / PR docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422。
• 守卫 scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs：accountIndependence 与 recordVerdict 里的 not-independent / account-missing / attribution-unreadable 拒绝（exit 3）、refusal / clear 里的账户行、attribution 接线及对应自测电池（floor 28 → 27）；record-recognisers.mjs 的 readReviewedByAccount / readAttributionLogin / REVIEWED_BY_ACCOUNT_LINE 及定位器的 account 字段（floor 13 → 12），删前 git grep 确认无其他调用方。来源：卡 check-governed-queue-guard: a PR landed from a project thread needs a review of record whose Reviewed-by session belongs to a different account from the PR's attribution github_login, else Tier S does not enqueue (maintainer's word 2026-10-23) #25415 / PR feat(pm): the queue guard refuses a project-thread Tier S record reviewed from the PR's own account #25436。
• 复审记录里的 Reviewed-by-account: 行不再是要求。

工作量：skills 车道 1 张 S 卡（维护者点名「立skills卡」，Skills 席立并认领；门禁按 SUBJECT 归 skills，见 SKILL.md 域车道表）。规则文 + 守卫代码同一 PR 即可：check-governed-merges --test 对三文件判 Tier S（只 .claude/** 命中），merge_group 检出的是合并组提交，该 PR 由它自己带的新守卫代码判定，不会卡在自己身上（Skills 席读数）；席位建议 p1，因为它挡着三条车道的全部落地；改 skills 用 fable。它合入后本 PR 重新 ready + 入队即可，⛔ 不需要维护者 Approve 过桥。

本 PR 现状：run 40046346946 被踢出队列、席位退回 draft；等上述 PR 合入即重入队。简报：https://claude.ai/artifact/7DqUJYPGGTh6mEN7PK1Xvi。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

席位核对 — re-arm

domain:skills#2 · session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM · 2026-10-24T02:41Z · head c9dae4256c4ed54964695bf0ec8ce9354a1a8f83 (unchanged)

This PR left the merge queue at the guard's same-account refusal (run 40046346946) and was returned to draft. The rule behind that refusal was removed on the maintainer's word (「守卫在合并队列里只认「另一账户复审」，这个没必要，去掉这条规则」, recorded as comment 6378076465) by PR #25585, now merged as 543b3d1fa8. The review of record 6377468190 and the ACCEPT 6377652663 stand on this same head; git merge-tree onto main 543b3d1fa8 is conflict-free and the diff is still the nine files. This seat flips ready and arms auto-merge again now.

---

Generated by Claude Code