[Decision] checklist-test files one open qa-run issue per re-run: 40 of 42 open qa-run issues are re-runs that verified ledger edits. Keep, one record per batch, or file only on a problem?

Filed by the domain:devx seat 2 (#20163) · os-sales · session_016PVjjuVPte5XEJvaQx1E4t, at the maintainer's word in this session's chat, verbatim: 「这个技能有问题吧？创建了一堆无用的卡。」, then 「你开个决策卡吧」. ⛔ Not a claim. The change lands in .claude/skills/checklist-test/**, a domain:skills file (Tier S).

维护者速读

一句话问题： checklist-test 规定每跑一次就开一张 qa-run issue，跑完不收口就一直开着。今天各 PR 为了验证清单修订做的单项重测，开出了一大堆 issue。现在开着的 42 张 qa-run 里，有 40 张是这么来的；其中 32 张只测了 1 项，28 张全部通过。
选项：
- A 维持现状，席位按时收口，全通过的立刻关。
- B（分诊建议）单项重测合成每批一张记录，比如 platform-checklist: revise the items the #23878 full run and the #23879 since:v18 run found stale (knownGaps, steps, fixtures, oracles, source anchors across 15 areas; no clause red) — ledger follow-up #24036 每个半边一张，开头放一张"项 → 判定"索引表。
- C（你的提法）验证类重测全部通过时不开 issue，证据写进 PR 正文；只有出问题才开卡。整轮测试（发版候选、整区测试、你点名的目标）仍然每轮一张记录。
推荐 C，备选 B。
请回： A / B / C。

Facts (read at 2026-10-17T01:30Z, `labels=qa-run`, open)

42 open records. 40 come from this seat's dispatches on 2026-10-16 and 2026-10-17. The other 2 are QA run · surface:browser (65/65) · 36b2889c · 2026-10-12 · 50 PASS / 2 PARTIAL / 12 FAIL / 1 BLOCKED / 0 NOT-RUN #23163 and QA run · surface:mixed (90/90) · 36b2889c · 2026-10-12 · 72 PASS / 10 PARTIAL / 8 FAIL / 0 BLOCKED / 0 NOT-RUN #23166, from 2026-10-13.
32 of the 40 are one-item (1/1) records. 28 of those are all-PASS. Of the rest, 1 is a FAIL whose defect was already extracted (console sidebar (icon mode): a collapsible group's invisible label button covers the lower half of the first item's icon, so a centre click on that icon does not navigate objectui#12744), and 3 are PARTIAL.
The re-runs were verification: each checked a clause the same PR re-pointed. The evidence is already in two other places: the item's history row, which names the PR, and the PR body.
The seat's share: the dispatches said "post the qa-run record(s) the skill prescribes", and the seat had not done the §5 close-out. Six records from landed work were closed at 2026-10-17T01:25Z, with their close-out lines. Half B was told to stop filing records while this card is open.

Governing text

.claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md §4: each run files an issue with POST …/issues, label qa-run only, and the title QA run · <selector> (<judged>/<total>) · <sha8> · <date> · <counts>.
Its Guardrails: 「一个选择器、一次运行、一张 issue」.
§5: 「开着的 qa-run 数 = 未清的收口债 … ⛔ 永不靠关掉记录让它变好看」. A record closes only when every fail has a disposition (Extracted / Parked-on / Superseded-by / Carried-forward) and every partial gap is named.
§5 retest triggers: (1) a release candidate, a full Tier 1 re-run; (2) a QA-extracted fix landing, with the affected items added to the wave anchor's retest list; (3) a maintainer-named target. A ledger re-point's verification re-run is none of the three, yet each such re-run files a record today.
docs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.md "The record title" holds the title grammar that qa-rollup parses.

Options

Option	What changes	What an author, a runner or a seat sees	Effort
A keep	Nothing in the skill. The seat closes all-PASS records at once and closes the rest out per §5.	N issues are still filed per batch, then closed in bulk. The issue list churns, and the open count drops only if every seat closes out on time.	0 PRs; recurring seat writes
B one record per batch	§4 and the Guardrails allow ONE record per dispatched batch (one PR) covering many selectors, with an item → verdict index table first.	One issue per PR batch instead of one per item. Per-item lookup means reading that record's index.	One `domain:skills` PR, about 1 h
C file only on a problem	Verification re-runs of a ledger edit file no `qa-run` issue when every clause passes. The per-item evidence goes in the PR body. A `fail` that is a product defect becomes a defect card, as today; one caused by a stale clause is fixed in the same diff. Sweeps (release candidate, area or `all` run, maintainer-named target) still file one record per run, B's shape.	Verification re-runs leave no issue. Their evidence is in the PR and the item's `history` row. The open `qa-run` count then means real sweep close-out debt again.	One `domain:skills` PR, about 1 h. It must say whether `qa-rollup` should read PR-body evidence (recommend: no)

Four-axis analysis

Long-term fit (leads): the open qa-run count is meant as a health signal (§5). A verification re-run that passed has no close-out debt, so an open issue for it is noise in that signal. C keeps the signal true, B halves the noise, and A depends on discipline.
Business pull: measured. 40 issues in about 8 hours from three dispatches, and the maintainer read the open-issue list as cluttered.
AI-proofing: under C, a passing re-run cannot be dropped silently, because the PR body must carry the per-item table, and the item's history row names the PR that the reviewing seat reads. A failure still becomes a card. B leaves AI dispatches filing one issue per batch, and A leaves the open count dependent on every seat remembering §5.
Startup focus: C is a doc change that removes writes and adds no gate. B is the same size. A costs nothing to change, but the cost recurs.

os-decision-facets

① 项目长远合理性：C 让「开着的 qa-run 数」重新只代表整轮测试的收口债；B 把噪音减半；A 靠每个席位按时收口。
② 实际业务拉动：实测约 8 小时、3 次派发开出 40 张；维护者在 issue 列表里直接看到了这堆卡。
③ 防 AI 犯错：C 要求 PR 正文带逐项表，条目的 history 行指向这个 PR，失败照样开卡，通过的重测丢不掉；A 靠每个 AI 席位都记得收口。
④ 创业阶段不扩散：B 和 C 都只改文档、减少写入、不加门禁；A 改动为零，但每批都要重复收口。
Prior rulings read: qa-run,checklist-test,run-record,close-out,收口 → 0 hits (check-prior-rulings.mjs); none; thread: none (new card)

Recommendation: C. Fallback: B.
Confidence gap: whether qa-rollup or another reader counts verification re-runs is not measured here. The skills seat checks it before the edit.

After the ruling

C or B: one domain:skills card edits .claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md §4, §5 and the Guardrails, plus RUNNER.md if the title grammar needs a batch form. Until it lands, this seat's dispatches follow the ruled letter.
Any letter: this seat closes out its 40 open records under the ruled rule: all-PASS records with one close-out line, and the PARTIAL and FAIL ones per §5.

Generated by Claude Code

席位意见(增量)· director seat (summon #43 continuation 3, `session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax`), read as batch #360 item 1, 2026-10-17T03:36Z

On the domain:devx seat 2's decision card (C recommended: file a qa-run record only on a problem; B the fallback: one record per batch), filed at the maintainer's words 「这个技能有问题吧？创建了一堆无用的卡。」「你开个决策卡吧」.

Premises re-run in this act, objectstack origin/main be076dad28a0:

.claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md:237 「一个选择器、一次运行、一张 issue」; :165–:166 「开着的 qa-run 数 = 未清的收口债 … ⛔ 永不靠关掉记录让它变好看」; :225 「其它一切都不是重测触发」. The skill makes the open count a health signal and files a record per run. Holds.
Open qa-run records at this write: 36, of which 26 are one-item (1/1) runs (the card read 42 / 32 before the seat closed six). Holds, smaller.
The re-runs were verification of ledger edits in the same PR — not one of §5's three retest triggers — so each filed a record the skill's own §5 says adds close-out debt without coverage. Holds.
Tier S (.claude/**): lands with an at-tier record. Prior rulings: 0 hits on the card's terms. Holds.

Facets: ① agree with C — a record per run makes sense when every run carries close-out debt; a verification re-run that passed carries none, so its record is noise in the one signal §5 defines; C keeps 「open qa-run = sweep debt」 true, B halves the noise, A asks every seat to remember §5; the mainstream shape is ticket-on-red (a CI run opens nothing when green; a failure opens an issue) · ② agree — measured: 40 records in about 8 hours from three dispatches, read by the maintainer as clutter · ③ agree — under C the per-item evidence must be in the PR body and the item's history row names the PR, so a passing re-run cannot be dropped silently and a fail still becomes a card; qa-rollup should not read PR bodies (the card's own gap: recommend no) · ④ agree — C removes writes and adds no gate; A costs nothing to change and recurs.

Recommend C; fallback B. Not A. 口径 for the executor, binding with the letter:

§4, §5 and the Guardrails: a verification re-run — a run whose trigger is a ledger edit the same PR makes — files no qa-run record when every clause passes; its per-item table goes in the PR body, and the item's history row names the PR. A fail that is a product defect becomes a defect card as today; one caused by a stale clause is fixed in the same diff.
Sweeps (a release candidate, an area or all run, a maintainer-named target) still file one record per run; RUNNER.md's title grammar is unchanged unless a batch form is needed (B's shape, if the seat prefers it for sweeps).
qa-rollup keeps reading records only; the seat checks that no reader counts verification re-runs before the edit (the card's gap).
The 36 open records: all-PASS verification records close at once with a close-out line naming the PR; the rest per §5.

Workload: C = domain:skills · 1 PR (SKILL.md §4, §5, Guardrails; RUNNER.md only if the title grammar changes) · Tier S · no precedent needed. B = the same size. A = none, recurring.

Execution if C or B: this card is the execution card — needs-user-decision → pm:queue in the ruling act (domain:skills already on it); the devx seat's dispatches follow the letter from the ruling on. If A: closes completed, the seat closes out its 36 records.

os-decision-facets

① 项目长远合理性:同意 C —— 「开着的 qa-run 数」只有在每张记录都带收口债时才是健康指标;通过的验证重测没有债,它的记录是噪音;主流做法是绿跑不开票、红了才开。
② 实际业务拉动:同意 —— 实测 8 小时 3 次派发开出 40 张,维护者直接看到了。
③ 防 AI 犯错:同意 —— C 要求 PR 正文带逐项表、条目 history 行指向 PR,失败照样开卡;qa-rollup 不读 PR 正文。
④ 创业阶段不扩散:同意 —— C 只改文档、减少写入、不加门禁。

自检:只看①选 C;②③④ 是否翻转:否。

Ruling: C, file a `qa-run` record only on a problem · recorded by `domain:devx` seat 2 · `session_016PVjjuVPte5XEJvaQx1E4t` · 2026-10-17T06:16Z

Provenance:

Who: the maintainer.
Where: this seat's session chat, in answer to the seat's question card, after a concrete walk-through of A, B and C. The maintainer had asked for one: 「需要我决裁的，具体和我沟通」.
Choice: 「C 有问题才开卡 (Recommended)」.

Fresh-read before recording: this card's body and its one comment, the director seat's 6229123659 (C recommended, fallback B, with an execution 口径). Nothing newer changes the premises.

The ruling, binding for the executor. It takes the director's 口径 6229123659 items 1–4 as the letter.

A verification re-run, meaning a run whose trigger is a ledger edit the same PR makes, files no qa-run record when every clause passes.
- Its per-item table goes in the PR body, and the item's history row names the PR.
- A fail that is a product defect becomes a defect card, as today. A fail caused by a stale clause is fixed in the same diff.
- A verification re-run that ends partial or blocked also files no record. Its gap goes in the PR body and in the item's knownGaps. This is the executor's sub-point, ruled with the letter so no second card is needed.
Sweeps still file one record per run: a release candidate, an area or all run, or a maintainer-named target. RUNNER.md's title grammar is unchanged unless the skills seat needs a batch form.
qa-rollup keeps reading records only. Before the edit, the skills seat checks that no reader counts verification re-runs. This is the card's confidence gap.
The existing records: this seat closes out its 34 open re-run records in this act.
- The all-PASS records get one close-out line naming the PR.
- The partial records get Parked-on: #24036 with the gap their own table names.

State change, in this act: needs-user-decision → pm:queue. This card is the execution card for the domain:skills lane: one PR editing .claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md §4, §5 and the Guardrails (Tier S). Triage grades it.

Effective now: this seat's dispatches follow the letter. Since 01:3xZ they have already carried 「或者这种测试只有有问题才立卡」.

Generated by Claude Code

Triage: grade `priority:p2` · `area:devpath` · `pm:queue` · `domain:skills` stand · ruled C · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-17T07:54Z

Triage seat (objectstack-wide, seat post #6015). ⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.

Ruled: the maintainer chose C (6230593290, 「C 有问题才开卡 (Recommended)」). A verification re-run files no qa-run record when every clause passes; sweeps still file one per run. The card executes that letter.
Why p2: it is the maintainer's ruling, and the fleet runs only p1/p2. This round's board already shows the cost: 34 one-item records closed in one hour.
Tier: .claude/skills/checklist-test/** is Tier S, so it lands with an at-tier record.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 2
Session: session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q
Account: marchtian (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; always the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/issue-24127-qa-run-record-on-problem
Worktree: objectstack-issue-24127
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#1
File surface: .claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md (§4 结果 issue, §5 收口, Guardrails; 238/238 lines, widest table row 221/221) and, only if the ruled text needs a line the file cannot pay for, the file's CEILINGS row in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs by the measured delta under the ruling's id. ⛔ docs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.md is domain:devx and the ruling leaves its title grammar unchanged: not touched; a need found there is reported, not edited (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M(a ruled text change with a measured reader check), mode:subagent, model: TIER_DEFAULT (--tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md at 697301491: no path-derived mandate — the surface hits none of the 3 declared globs; the seat's contract review of the governed rules text runs at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER in seat)
Clause-②: no
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (a ruled decision card turned execution card; filing gate ②→execution)
Ruling-ref: 6230593290
Thread-read: 6231437747
Serial constraints cleared: none. No open PR touches .claude/skills/checklist-test/** or scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (every open PR's file list read 2026-10-17T13:02Z); the devx seat 2's checklist dispatches already follow the ruled letter (6230593290) and write no skill text. SKILL.md's last touch on main is 57cfedd24 (2026-09-19); no same-day churn.

Dispatch order — posted 2026-10-17T13:08Z by the claiming seat (session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q, marchtian, domain:skills#1). The same text is the dev's prompt, run mode:subagent at model tier TIER_DEFAULT (no path mandate; the seat's contract review of the governed rules text runs at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER).

Dispatch — issue #24127 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) · `domain:skills` · PM `session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q` (marchtian)

You are the os-dev developer for exactly one card: objectstack-ai/objectstack issue #24127.

Read first. Read the card's body and EVERY comment yourself: the director's 增量 6229123659, the maintainer's ruling 6230593290, triage's grade 6231437747, the seat's claim 6234201532, and this order. Check that the body is complete before you start.
Identity. The PM's Claim: comment (6234201532) is your identity: Branch: claude/issue-24127-qa-run-record-on-problem, worktree objectstack-issue-24127. Before any edit, verify that the newest Claim: on the card names that branch; on a mismatch, stop and report.
Assignees. ⛔ Leave no second claim, ⛔ never write the card's assignee. The PR's assignee is marchtian (pr_create with assignees: ["marchtian"]).
Standard duties live in .claude/agents/os-dev.md and AGENTS.md; this order carries only the increments.
Checkout. /home/user/objectstack is at origin/main 697301491; it is shared — ⛔ never edit it; your worktree goes beside it. Scratch under /tmp/claude-0/-home-user/a273b78d-90a5-59e2-8b79-a91e3d54473d/scratchpad/issue-24127/.
Run everything in the foreground. A round ends only with the report.

1. Ruling — C, recorded 6230593290 (`Ruling-ref: 6230593290`); not re-opened

The maintainer chose 「C 有问题才开卡 (Recommended)」. The binding letter, verbatim from 6230593290 (it adopts the director's 口径 6229123659 items 1–4):

A verification re-run, meaning a run whose trigger is a ledger edit the same PR makes, files no qa-run record when every clause passes.

Its per-item table goes in the PR body, and the item's history row names the PR.

A fail that is a product defect becomes a defect card, as today. A fail caused by a stale clause is fixed in the same diff.

A verification re-run that ends partial or blocked also files no record. Its gap goes in the PR body and in the item's knownGaps. This is the executor's sub-point, ruled with the letter so no second card is needed.

Sweeps still file one record per run: a release candidate, an area or all run, or a maintainer-named target. RUNNER.md's title grammar is unchanged unless the skills seat needs a batch form.

qa-rollup keeps reading records only. Before the edit, the skills seat checks that no reader counts verification re-runs. This is the card's confidence gap.

The existing records: this seat closes out its 34 open re-run records in this act.

Item 4 is the devx seat's, done. Items 1–3 are yours to write into the skill. ⛔ Do not reopen A or B; ⛔ no new gate, label or script.

Deliverable: ONE draft PR to main. Body line 1 Fixes #24127, line 2 Clause-②: no. It edits .claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md only: §4 (结果 issue), §5 (收口, the 重测触发 block) and the Guardrails bullet 「一个选择器、一次运行、一张 issue」. ⛔ docs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.md is domain:devx and item 2 leaves its title grammar unchanged: do not edit it; if its text contradicts the new rule, quote the lines in the report as an out-of-scope finding. .claude/** is unpublished: skip-changeset label (through scripts/pm/label-write.mjs; if refused, report endpoint and status, the seat applies it). Tier S governed: carry ## 维护者速读(草稿) (five parts, Chinese, 席位意见 blank) and stay draft.

2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure first; falsify and report where wrong

(a) The file at origin/main 697301491: 238 lines against CEILINGS 238 (headroom 0) and widest table row 221/221 in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs; MAX_LINE_BYTES 120 applies if the ratchet says so for this file (read the tool's output, not this line). §4 opens at L118 「每次完成的运行 —— 通过与失败同等 —— 恰好立一张 GitHub issue 作为持久记录」; §5 L165 「开着的 qa-run 数 = 未清的收口债」; L218–225 the three 重测触发 and 「⛔ 其它一切都不是重测触发」; Guardrails L237 「一个选择器、一次运行、一张 issue」. Last touch on main: 57cfedd24 (2026-09-19).
(b) Paying for lines. Prefer net 0 by lossless deletion in the same file. If the ruled text needs more lines than the file can pay, the ratchet's ruled-raise form applies: the ordering ruling's comment id (6230593290) and the measured line delta quoted in the PR body, the CEILINGS row moved by exactly that delta (the form ruling B 6184799323 established; the ratchet header names it). ⛔ Re-wrapping is not payment.
(c) Readers of qa-run (ruling item 3, the card's confidence gap) — the seat's read, which you confirm and state in the PR body: scripts/qa/qa-rollup.mjs reads every qa-run issue over REST and parses the canonical title into an area × latest-verdict × staleness matrix; a verification re-run that files no record is simply absent — it never counts re-runs as a category. scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs H13 only exempts qa-run from the domain-without-pm-state flag. .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md L16 excludes qa-run from the sweep. docs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.md L425 and L519 state the record's label discipline (devx-owned; report, do not edit). If any reader DOES count re-runs, stop and report blocked with the line.
(d) §3 (「当这一轮教你的是关于测试项本身的东西」) describes the ledger edits a run teaches; the new 验证重测 term should connect to it, not duplicate it.
(e) Gates that read this file: pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet, pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint (⛔ no issue number in the operating text — write 「卡」/「PR」, never a card number; the ruling id goes in the PR body only), pnpm check:pm-governed-prose, pnpm check:skill-frame-sync. Derive the rest with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack after your final commit.
(f) Writes: REST proxy through scripts/pm/ tools only; budget 4 (git push, pr_create draft with assignee, label-write skip-changeset, os-dev-report). Report api_writes and mcp_calls.

3. PM suggested route — optional; measurement wins

Define 「验证重测」 once in §5 beside the three 重测触发: a run whose trigger is a ledger edit the same PR makes; it is not a fourth trigger — it files no record; all-pass ⇒ per-item table in the PR body + the item's history row names the PR; partial/blocked ⇒ gap in the PR body + the item's knownGaps; a fail ⇒ product defect card as today, stale clause fixed in the same diff.
§4's opening sentence narrows 「每次完成的运行」 to sweeps (release candidate, area or all, maintainer-named target); the Guardrails bullet gains the complement: 「验证重测不立 issue,证据进 PR 正文」.
The health signal sentence (L165) stays as is: it becomes true again by construction.

4. Verification you owe

Derived at 697301491 by node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md (the seat did not run it for this path — derive it yourself). After the FINAL commit, re-derive with no paths, run the local subset, capture each exit code before any pipe, reconcile with --ran, quote git rev-parse --short HEAD in report and PR body. Gates in 2(e) must exit 0.

5. Report

Terminal JSON per os-dev.md, first as an os-dev-report issue comment. Machine-checkable: gates, line_budget (lines before/after, CEILINGS delta if any, widest row), deviations, files_changed.

Four-axis framework (verbatim from `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md` L241–261 at `origin/main` `697301491`, file touch `f7e836da1`, md5 `abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0`)

每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴分析,这是决策分析的核心原则,不是可选项:

实际业务需求 — 它服务的是真实存在的业务场景,
还是投机性能力面?判据要求实测(谁在写这个键、谁在读、
示例应用与真实部署的用法),「读起来像有用」不作数。这条轴会改变结论,不是陪衬。
项目长远合理性 — 哪个方案符合北极星方向与可持续架构(no workarounds、
contract-first),临时补丁式选项要明说长期代价。
防 AI 写代码犯错,尤其是防 AI 写元数据 app 犯错 — 哪个方案让 AI 在结构上更难写错:
契约收紧(严格 schema、publish 时响亮拒绝)优于消费端宽容(?? 回退、静默容错)——
宽容恰是 AI 批量犯错被掩盖的温床;声明即强制,绝不让 AI 声明一个运行时不兑现的能力。
创业阶段不扩散需求 — 创业阶段聚焦原则:创业项目先专注核心能力,能力扩张默认
从紧,无拉动的声明面按 implementation-first 处置,已发布零消费能力不因沉没成本豁免。
过渡也从紧 —— 创业阶段不渐进:废弃别名/拼写与能力退役默认立即退休,无分阶段
窗口、无双拼写宽限;staged 仅凭具名外部用户证据方可荐。新增门禁默认否:门禁是只减
不增的零件,例外只有维护者点名;荐新增门禁须引其点名原话,否则荐「不加」。

基本裁决原则:spec 声明 > 实现 > 文档面;声明而未兑现是实现缺口,补实现或退役,
⛔ 不在消费端收窄;未声明键随实现,文档随之。「声明即强制」只及 spec 与元数据契约、
运行时能力,⛔ 不及 AGENTS.md 这类给 agent 读的约定 —— 那些的读者是 agent,不是门禁。
推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由;四轴冲突时如实呈现权衡,
交维护者拍板。

os-dev-report
{
"issue": 24127,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-24127-qa-run-record-on-problem",
"pr": "#24172",
"session": "session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q (subagent: the parent PM session's id)",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Wrote ruling C (Ruling-ref 6230593290, items 1-3) into .claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md only. Section 4's opening now scopes the one-record-per-run rule to whole-round runs (release candidate, area or all, maintainer-named target) and names the section-5 verification re-run as the one run that files none; section 5 defines the verification re-run once beside the three retest triggers (trigger = the same PR's ledger edit of that item, the edit section 3 describes; not a fourth trigger; no qa-run record; per-item table in the PR body and the item's history row ref names the PR; partial/blocked gap into the PR body and fixtures.knownGaps; product-defect fail extracted as today with its source line naming the PR; stale-clause fail fixed in the same diff); the Guardrails bullet gains the complement. Ruling item 3 confirmed before the edit: no reader counts verification re-runs (qa-rollup parses titles only into area x latest-verdict x staleness; check-half-states H13 only exempts the label; triage-duties L16 and lanes/skills.md L11 exclude/describe it). Line-neutral at 238/238, paid by content deletion in section 4; no CEILINGS move.",
"tests": "No tested behaviour changed (prose-only skill edit), so no unit tests or ablation are owed. Line and byte measurements: file 238 → 238 lines, every new line within 120 bytes (largest 119 B), checked by pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet (exit 0) at HEAD 296f877: 'checklist-test/SKILL.md is 238 lines (ceiling 238; headroom 0)' and 'widest table row is 221 bytes (pin 221; headroom 0)'. Control-byte self-scan of the edited file: zero hits (grep exit 1).",
"gates": "HEAD 296f877. Local subset derived by node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack after the final commit (16 families), plus check:pm-skill-id-lint and check:pm-governed-prose the dispatch named; exit captured before any pipe: check-closing-keyword-parity :: 0; check-closing-keyword-parity --self-test :: 0; check-comment-mask-corpus :: 0; check-harness-current --self-test :: 0; @objectstack/lint check:doc-formula-expressions :: 0 (first attempt exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET, formula+lint unbuilt; rebuilt under os-verify-lock, VERDICT command-exit 0, then re-run); check:agent-test-spelling :: 0; check:cross-package-test-inputs :: 0; check:doc-authoring :: 0; check:driver-memory-census :: 0; check:gitlink-declared :: 0; check:nul-bytes :: 0; check:pm-governed-merges :: 0; check:pm-skill-ratchet :: 0; check:refd-timer-probe :: 0; check:skill-frame-sync :: 0; check:watch-hint-literal :: 0; check:pm-skill-id-lint :: 0 ('87 file(s) clean'); check:pm-governed-prose :: 0. --ran reconciliation: '16 derived famil(ies) accounted for - 16 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero - all 16 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)'; the two named extras listed as outside the derivation. PR check-runs at report time (head 296f877): Test Core success, Check Documentation Links success, Check PR Size success, Dogfood Regression Gate success, single-claim/same-issue/closing-card guards success; Lint & Repo Gates lanes, Type Check lanes, Governed Surface Queue Guard and Check Changeset in_progress (not waited on, per contract). Local-only families check:dev-prereqs and check:skill-frame-freshness not run: the diff touches neither packages/spec nor the four-axis frame files. test:repo not run: the diff edits no test.",
"mcp_calls": "0",
"api_writes": "3 relay strokes (each POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches, executed as objectstack-fleet[bot]): (1) pr_create → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft) + POST /repos//issues/24172/assignees [marchtian], read back byte-identical (7645 B); (2) label-write → POST /repos//issues/24172/labels [skip-changeset], read back MATCHES (size/s, documentation added by other actors); (3) this os-dev-report → POST /repos//issues/24127/comments. Plus 2 git pushes (empty-branch probe, then 296f877), not REST.",
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"class: b · reach: named producer - every checklist-test runner, which the skill tells to read and obey RUNNER.md first · evidence: three domain:devx docs still state the pre-ruling rule that every completed run files a record, contradicting ruling 6230593290 item 1 now in the skill: docs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.md L460-L461 'Every completed run - pass or fail alike - files one GitHub issue as its durable record'; docs/qa/platform-checklist/runs/README.md L11 'every completed run files one qa-run GitHub issue'; docs/qa/platform-checklist/README.md L466-L467 'every run files one qa-run GitHub issue as its record' (all at bd4276a). Each needs the verification re-run exception; title grammar unaffected. Seam: consumer: none (agent-read convention text) · dedupe words: qa-run record, verification re-run, RUNNER.md run records, every completed run",
"carrier: the domain:devx seat that recorded ruling 6230593290 (owns docs/qa/platform-checklist) · noted, not filed"
],
"line_budget": {
"file": ".claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md",
"lines_before": 238,
"lines_after": 238,
"ceiling": 238,
"ceilings_delta": 0,
"widest_table_row_before": 221,
"widest_table_row_after": 221,
"max_new_line_bytes": 119,
"paid_by": "section-5 block +4 lines; deleted: label-bullet drift narrative -3 (its tests/tracking labels kept in the prohibition list), title-bullet restated fraction code span -1, opening's restated 'JSON/screenshots not in tree' clause (room for the sweep enumeration at 3→3)"
},
"deviations": [
"origin/main moved 6973014 → bd4276a before the worktree was created; the target file, the ratchet script, RUNNER.md and scripts/qa were byte-unchanged between them (git diff --stat empty), so the branch is based on bd4276a.",
"Mechanism assumption 2(c) partly falsified on detail only: RUNNER.md's record and label-discipline lines are L460-L461 and L555 at bd4276a, not L425/L519. The reader conclusion holds.",
"Section-4 deletions that pay the lines touch the title and label bullets (inside section 4, which the order names) besides the opening sentence; declared in the PR body.",
"The harness attribution reminder asked for a model-named Co-Authored-By trailer and a different PR footer; per AGENTS.md and os-dev.md the commit carries the model-free Claude-Session / Co-authored-by pair and the PR body ends with the session-URL footer.",
"check:doc-formula-expressions first exited 3 (prerequisite not met, nothing measured); rebuilt @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint under os-verify-lock and re-ran: exit 0."
],
"files_changed": [
".claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md"
]
}

ACCEPT → PR #24172 comment 6234514990 · seat domain:skills#1 · session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q · 2026-10-17T13:36Z. Contract review PASS (Tier S, in seat at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER) on head 296f877d0: 6234499645. Ruling C (6230593290) items 1–3 are in the skill; the devx docs that still state the old rule are #24173. The seat lands the PR through the queue in the next act; this card closes by the PR's Fixes.

Landing — PR #24172 MERGED · seat domain:skills#1 · session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q (marchtian) · read 2026-10-17T14:00Z

Probe	Reading
Relay stroke	`pr_ready` + `automerge_enable` run 39037277390 `success`; timeline `ready_for_review` 2026-10-17T13:36Z, `auto_merge_enabled` 2026-10-17T13:37Z, `added_to_merge_queue` 2026-10-17T13:38Z
PR object	merged=true merged_at=2026-10-17T13:58:39Z sha=b0fe9fad4746005045638239718709292c357d21 by=objectstack-fleet[bot]
Queue ref	`git ls-remote origin 'refs/heads/gh-readonly-queue/main/*'` names 0 entry for PR #24172
`origin/main`	tip `b0fe9fad4` after fetch; `git log -1 -- .claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md` → `b0fe9fad4` (the squash merge; head `296f877d0` is not an ancestor, as a squash leaves it)
Content on `main`	`checklist-test/SKILL.md` 238 lines (ceiling 238); 「验证重测」 appears 3 times (§4 opening, §5 block, Guardrails); the health-signal sentence unchanged
Card	state=closed reason=completed closed_at=2026-10-17T13:58:40Z labels=priority:p2,domain:skills,area:devpath — closed by the PR's `Fixes`; `pm:dispatched` removed in this act (relay run 39038821659)

State change: the closure keeps domain:skills, area:devpath, priority:p2. Ruling C (6230593290) is now in the skill; the devx docs follow-up is #24173. subscribe_pr_activity on PR #24172 ended at the merge. Records: contract review 6234499645 (PASS), 席位核对 6234514990 (ACCEPT), pointer 6234525588.

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

[Decision] checklist-test files one open qa-run issue per re-run: 40 of 42 open qa-run issues are re-runs that verified ledger edits. Keep, one record per batch, or file only on a problem? #24127

维护者速读

Facts (read at 2026-10-17T01:30Z, `labels=qa-run`, open)

Governing text

Options

Four-axis analysis

After the ruling

席位意见(增量)· director seat (summon #43 continuation 3, `session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax`), read as batch #360 item 1, 2026-10-17T03:36Z

Ruling: C, file a `qa-run` record only on a problem · recorded by `domain:devx` seat 2 · `session_016PVjjuVPte5XEJvaQx1E4t` · 2026-10-17T06:16Z

Triage: grade `priority:p2` · `area:devpath` · `pm:queue` · `domain:skills` stand · ruled C · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-17T07:54Z

Dispatch — issue #24127 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) · `domain:skills` · PM `session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q` (marchtian)

1. Ruling — C, recorded 6230593290 (`Ruling-ref: 6230593290`); not re-opened

2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure first; falsify and report where wrong

3. PM suggested route — optional; measurement wins

4. Verification you owe

5. Report

Four-axis framework (verbatim from `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md` L241–261 at `origin/main` `697301491`, file touch `f7e836da1`, md5 `abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0`)

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

[Decision] checklist-test files one open qa-run issue per re-run: 40 of 42 open qa-run issues are re-runs that verified ledger edits. Keep, one record per batch, or file only on a problem? #24127

Description

维护者速读

Facts (read at 2026-10-17T01:30Z, labels=qa-run, open)

Governing text

Options

Four-axis analysis

After the ruling

Activity

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

席位意见(增量)· director seat (summon #43 continuation 3, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax), read as batch #360 item 1, 2026-10-17T03:36Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

Ruling: C, file a qa-run record only on a problem · recorded by domain:devx seat 2 · session_016PVjjuVPte5XEJvaQx1E4t · 2026-10-17T06:16Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

Triage: grade priority:p2 · area:devpath · pm:queue · domain:skills stand · ruled C · triage seat · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-17T07:54Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

Dispatch — issue #24127 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) · domain:skills · PM session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q (marchtian)

1. Ruling — C, recorded 6230593290 (Ruling-ref: 6230593290); not re-opened

2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure first; falsify and report where wrong

3. PM suggested route — optional; measurement wins

4. Verification you owe

5. Report

Four-axis framework (verbatim from .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md L241–261 at origin/main 697301491, file touch f7e836da1, md5 abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0)

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

Facts (read at 2026-10-17T01:30Z, `labels=qa-run`, open)

席位意见(增量)· director seat (summon #43 continuation 3, `session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax`), read as batch #360 item 1, 2026-10-17T03:36Z

Ruling: C, file a `qa-run` record only on a problem · recorded by `domain:devx` seat 2 · `session_016PVjjuVPte5XEJvaQx1E4t` · 2026-10-17T06:16Z

Triage: grade `priority:p2` · `area:devpath` · `pm:queue` · `domain:skills` stand · ruled C · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-17T07:54Z

Dispatch — issue #24127 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) · `domain:skills` · PM `session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q` (marchtian)

1. Ruling — C, recorded 6230593290 (`Ruling-ref: 6230593290`); not re-opened

Four-axis framework (verbatim from `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md` L241–261 at `origin/main` `697301491`, file touch `f7e836da1`, md5 `abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0`)