test: patch test-utils and force dev mode#248
Conversation
commit: |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review infoConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request adds a patch for Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/fixtures/basic/nuxt.config.ts (1)
7-9: Consider adding a comment explaining whyappManifestis disabled.The PR description mentions a TODO to investigate why disabling the app-manifest is necessary. Adding a brief comment here would help future maintainers understand this workaround.
Suggested comment
experimental: { + // TODO: Investigate why appManifest must be disabled for tests (see PR `#248`) appManifest: false, },🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@test/fixtures/basic/nuxt.config.ts` around lines 7 - 9, Add an inline comment above the experimental.appManifest setting explaining why appManifest is disabled (e.g., reference the observed build/runtime issue, link or TODO ID, and any repro steps or ticket number), so future maintainers know this is an intentional workaround; update the block containing experimental and appManifest to include that concise explanatory comment and retain the existing TODO about investigating the root cause.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@test/fixtures/basic/nuxt.config.ts`:
- Around line 7-9: The linter is failing because the experimental object literal
in nuxt.config.ts is missing a trailing comma; update the experimental block
(the object with property appManifest: false) so the closing brace has a
trailing comma (i.e., change "experimental: { appManifest: false }" to
"experimental: { appManifest: false, },") to satisfy the comma rule.
In `@vitest.runtime.config.ts`:
- Around line 14-16: Add the missing trailing comma after the overrides object
so the surrounding object literal is properly terminated; locate the overrides
property (overrides: { dev: true }) in vitest.runtime.config.ts and append a
trailing comma after its closing brace to satisfy the linter.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@test/fixtures/basic/nuxt.config.ts`:
- Around line 7-9: Add an inline comment above the experimental.appManifest
setting explaining why appManifest is disabled (e.g., reference the observed
build/runtime issue, link or TODO ID, and any repro steps or ticket number), so
future maintainers know this is an intentional workaround; update the block
containing experimental and appManifest to include that concise explanatory
comment and retain the existing TODO about investigating the root cause.
ℹ️ Review info
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
patches/@nuxt__test-utils.patchpnpm-workspace.yamlsrc/plugins/hydration.tstest/fixtures/basic/nuxt.config.tsvitest.runtime.config.ts
🔗 Linked issue
📚 Description
TODO: investigate why we need to disable app-manifest