Developing risk table based on AFSC

[sbreitbart-NOAA]

• Added @BenWilliams-NOAA 's comma function from the AFSC safe package
• Started making risk table based on AFSC's SAFE main table. Copy/pasted Ben's code, then started adding code to extract specific variables, like total biomass, from model output file
• Stopped so that we could examine example AFSC model output and decide how to proceed

[BenWilliams-NOAA]

@sbreitbart-NOAA for clarification, this is the 'main table' which is pretty much the first thing our council, ssc, and ap look at. At the afsc a risk table is a qualitative indicator used to determine whether there should be a reduction in catch below maxABC .
The main table is created by pulling from the prior assessment table (if it exists) and incorporated into the parent document for consistency in reported values.

[sbreitbart-NOAA]

@sbreitbart-NOAA for clarification, this is the 'main table' which is pretty much the first thing our council, ssc, and ap look at. At the afsc a risk table is a qualitative indicator used to determine whether there should be a reduction in catch below maxABC . The main table is created by pulling from the prior assessment table (if it exists) and incorporated into the parent document for consistency in reported values.

Hi @BenWilliams-NOAA - thanks for letting me know!

[Schiano-NOAA]

@sbreitbart-NOAA sorry this is so late but is this function adjusted for the standard output dataframe or based on the one from Ben? If we just want to merge in so the table is a part of stockplotr then we need to change the definition of dat in this file rather than inheriting parameters.

[sbreitbart-NOAA]

@sbreitbart-NOAA sorry this is so late but is this function adjusted for the standard output dataframe or based on the one from Ben? If we just want to merge in so the table is a part of stockplotr then we need to change the definition of dat in this file rather than inheriting parameters.

This function was started using the standard output df. We stopped developing it in the fall because we needed AFSC sample data and didn't have it yet. So this function is still very much in dev.

[Schiano-NOAA]

@sbreitbart-NOAA do you want to close this PR or leave it open and revamped it at another time? The branch is pretty outdated at this point, so might be worth it to move the foundation to something else, but up to you!

[sbreitbart-NOAA]

@sbreitbart-NOAA do you want to close this PR or leave it open and revamped it at another time? The branch is pretty outdated at this point, so might be worth it to move the foundation to something else, but up to you!

I'm fine with closing it. It is pretty outdated!