Skip to content

codegen change for skipping InvalidRepeatedCapabilityError validation when not present in config.py - #2244

Draft
mohit-emerson wants to merge 1 commit into
ni:masterfrom
mohit-emerson:invalid_repcap_codegen
Draft

mohit-emerson wants to merge 1 commit into
ni:masterfrom
mohit-emerson:invalid_repcap_codegen

Conversation

@mohit-emerson

@mohit-emerson mohit-emerson commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • [] I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
  • [] I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

  • Skip repeated capability validation when InvalidRepeatedCapabilityError is not generated
    Drivers that have repeated capabilities but do not list InvalidRepeatedCapabilityError in extra_errors_used now pass repeated capability strings they cannot parse to the driver as-is, and the driver reports if they are invalid. Only a simple two-part range is expanded, and unsupported types raise TypeError. Drivers that list the error generate the same code as before.

List issues fixed by this Pull Request below, if any.

None

What testing has been done?

PR Validations

…or is not generated

Drivers that have repeated capabilities but do not list InvalidRepeatedCapabilityError in
extra_errors_used now pass repeated capability strings they cannot parse to the driver as-is,
and the driver reports if they are invalid. Only a simple two-part range is expanded, and
unsupported types raise TypeError. Drivers that list the error generate the same code as before.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.12%. Comparing base (5375937) to head (ff456db).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2244   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.12%   88.12%           
=======================================
  Files          88       88           
  Lines       22830    22830           
=======================================
+ Hits        20118    20119    +1     
+ Misses       2712     2711    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
codegenunittests 84.78% <ø> (ø)
nidcpowersystemtests 94.40% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
nidcpowerunittests 89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests 92.04% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalunittests 68.43% <ø> (ø)
nidmmsystemtests 92.33% <ø> (ø)
nifakeunittests 86.08% <ø> (ø)
nifgensystemtests 94.34% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstsystemtests 73.85% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstunittests 94.20% <ø> (ø)
nirfsasystemtests 82.71% <ø> (ø)
nirfsaunittests 63.37% <ø> (ø)
nirfsgsystemtests 81.22% <ø> (ø)
niscopesystemtests 89.99% <ø> (ø)
niscopeunittests 43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests 91.50% <ø> (ø)
niswitchsystemtests 81.66% <ø> (ø)
nitclksystemtests 94.87% <ø> (ø)
nitclkunittests 98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mohit-emerson mohit-emerson changed the title nirfsa codegen change for skipping InvalidRepeatedCapabilityError validation when not present in config.py codegen change for skipping InvalidRepeatedCapabilityError validation when not present in config.py Oct 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants