Skip to content

docs: add scheduler migration known issue - #912

Open
walteratsf wants to merge 1 commit into
mulesoft:latestfrom
walteratsf:users/walter-wang/document-ch1-scheduler-concurrency
Open

walteratsf wants to merge 1 commit into
mulesoft:latestfrom
walteratsf:users/walter-wang/document-ch1-scheduler-concurrency

Conversation

@walteratsf

@walteratsf walteratsf commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Documents a known Scheduler concurrency behavior change when migrating applications from CloudHub to CloudHub 2.0.

  • Explains that CloudHub 2.0 honors disallowConcurrentExecution, while affected CloudHub applications previously prevent overlapping executions even when the setting is false or omitted.
  • Identifies affected schedulers: those with short intervals whose execution can exceed the configured interval.
  • Describes the potential impact of overlapping executions on the shared application thread pool.
  • Recommends explicitly setting disallowConcurrentExecution="true" to prevent overlaps after migration.
  • Documents how to reduce repetitive Execution skipped log messages for short-interval schedulers.
  • Adds links to the known issue from application migration considerations and the application-code migration checklist.

Testing

  • Documentation-only change; reviewed rendered AsciiDoc structure and cross-references.

Writer's Quality Checklist

Before merging your PR, did you:

  • Run spell checker
  • Run link checker to check for broken xrefs
  • Check for orphan files
  • Perform a local build and do a final visual check of your content, including checking for:
    • Broken images
    • Dead links
    • Correct rendering of partials if they are used in your content
    • Formatting issues, such as:
      • Misnumbered ordered lists (steps) or incorrectly nested unordered lists
      • Messed up tables
      • Proper indentation
      • Correct header levels
  • Receive final review and signoff from:
    • Technical SME
    • Product Manager
    • Editor or peer reviewer
    • Reporter, if this content is in response to a reported issue (internal or external feedback)
  • If applicable, verify that the software actually got released

@walteratsf
walteratsf requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2026 16:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant