Filesystem symlinks leak external file metadata #5217

Which server?

filesystem (@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem)

Server version

0.6.3

How did you run the server?

Not applicable (a repository-level report)

Transport

stdio

Protocol era

Not sure

MCP client and version

n/a

Steps to reproduce

1. Start the filesystem server with one allowed directory.
2. Create a file outside the allowed directory and a symlink to it inside the allowed directory:

tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
mkdir "$tmp/allowed"
printf 'MCP-FILESYSTEM-SYMLINK-METADATA-MARKER\n' > "$tmp/outside-secret.txt"
ln -s "$tmp/outside-secret.txt" "$tmp/allowed/leaks-outside-size"

3. Call the MCP tool for the allowed directory:

{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 1,
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "list_directory_with_sizes",
    "arguments": {
      "path": "/tmp/example/allowed",
      "sortBy": "name"
    }
  }
}

The vulnerable code validates only args.path, then runs fs.readdir(validPath, { withFileTypes: true }), builds entryPath = path.join(validPath, entry.name), and calls fs.stat(entryPath).

Expected behavior

Directory listings that claim to operate only inside allowed directories should not follow symlink entries to targets outside the allowed tree. The tool should use lstat, or resolve each entry and enforce the same containment check before reading target metadata.

Actual behavior

A local reproduction created an allowed directory containing a symlink to an external file. The directory-entry metadata path followed the symlink:

allowed directory=/tmp/manual_mcp_filesystem_symlink_metadata_ldkba6qc/allowed
outside target=/tmp/manual_mcp_filesystem_symlink_metadata_ldkba6qc/outside-secret.txt
symlink entry=/tmp/manual_mcp_filesystem_symlink_metadata_ldkba6qc/allowed/leaks-outside-size
os.lstat symlink size=71
os.stat followed target size=39
outside target actual size=39
formatted listing=[FILE] leaks-outside-size             39 B

The reported listing size matches the outside target file size, not the symlink entry metadata.

Before you submit

• I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
• This is not a security vulnerability report (those go through the private advisory form).