-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 536
mcp: label resultType on results that bypass the dispatcher #1226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
roncodingenthusiast
wants to merge
4
commits into
modelcontextprotocol:main
Choose a base branch
from
roncodingenthusiast:ronald/gh-1225/stamp-resulttype-on-mrtr-results
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+318
−69
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7ef0cb3
mcp: label resultType on results that bypass the dispatcher
roncodingenthusiast 3b1b704
mcp: simplify comment wording in resultType labeling code
roncodingenthusiast 4cd8d60
Merge branch 'main' into ronald/gh-1225/stamp-resulttype-on-mrtr-results
guglielmo-san aa5b8ca
Merge branch 'main' into ronald/gh-1225/stamp-resulttype-on-mrtr-results
guglielmo-san File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do we still need to set this inside mrtr ? Now it should be enough the single call from handle
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We cannot remove this call from the code as it is now. The dispatcher reads
resultTypebeforehandleruns."content"in the JSON response asnulland not[].res.Contents == nilgives an error.Removing the mrtr call breaks a bunch of pre-existing tests: (eg.
TestServerConformance/mrtr.txtar, the threeTestMultiRoundTrip_ReadResource_*tests...).To remove it, I would also have to change the two dispatcher lines to read
InputRequestsand notresultType. I tried this approach and it seemed to work. The result is cleaner, but it changesinput_requireddetection on paths that are not related to #1225 or the current PR.I am happy to do it in this PR if you want or keep this as is. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would look cleaner, and add it to this PR.
Thanks!