Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions doc/src/SUMMARY.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,3 +46,4 @@
- [27: Verify atomically reference-counted Cell implementation](./challenges/0027-arc.md)
- [28: Verify float to decimal conversion module](./challenges/0028-flt2dec.md)
- [29: Safety of `boxed`](./challenges/0029-boxed.md)
- [31: Verify the safety of `BinaryHeap` functions](./challenges/0031-binary-heap.md)
Comment thread
feliperodri marked this conversation as resolved.
Resolved
92 changes: 92 additions & 0 deletions doc/src/challenges/0031-binary-heap.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
# Challenge 31: Verify the safety of `BinaryHeap` functions

- **Status:** *Open*
- **Solution:** *Option field to point to the PR that solved this challenge.*
- **Tracking Issue:** [#746](https://github.com/model-checking/verify-rust-std/issues/746)
- **Start date:** *2026/11/03*
- **Reward:** *TBD*

-------------------


## Goal
Comment thread
feliperodri marked this conversation as resolved.
Resolved

Verify the safety of `BinaryHeap` functions in [binary_heap/mod.rs](https://github.com/model-checking/verify-rust-std/blob/main/library/alloc/src/collections/binary_heap/mod.rs).

## Motivation

`BinaryHeap` is the priority queue of the standard library. To keep its elements in heap order, it moves them with raw pointer reads and copies, at positions chosen by comparing elements with `Ord`. `Ord` is safe code written by users and can return any result, so these moves must be safe even when the comparisons are inconsistent.

## Description

This challenge verifies the safety of `BinaryHeap`'s sift functions, `PeekMut`, the `TrustedLen` sorted iterators, and the safe methods built on them. The sifts move elements through `Hole`, which reads one element out with `ptr::read`, copies others into the gap with `ptr::copy_nonoverlapping` at positions chosen by `Ord`, and writes the element back in `Drop`. `PeekMut` shrinks the length to 1 while a `&mut T` to the top element is out.

The other `unsafe impl`s on `IntoIter` (`TrustedFused`, `SourceIter`, `InPlaceIterable`, `AsVecIntoIter`) delegate to `vec::IntoIter` and are out of scope for this challenge.

### Assumptions

* `Vec`'s implementation may be assumed correct, and its existing verified contracts may be reused.
* A panicking `Ord` is out of scope: solutions need not verify unwinding through `Drop for Hole`.

### Success Criteria

Write and prove the contract for the safety of the following unsafe functions:

| Function |
|---------|
|Hole::new|
|Hole::get|
|Hole::move_to|
Comment thread
feliperodri marked this conversation as resolved.
Resolved
|sift_up|
|sift_down_range|
|sift_down|
|sift_down_to_bottom|

Prove that the following implementations of the unsafe trait `TrustedLen` are correct, that is, that `size_hint` returns the exact number of remaining elements:

| Implementation |
|---------|
|TrustedLen for IntoIterSorted|
|TrustedLen for DrainSorted|
Comment thread
feliperodri marked this conversation as resolved.
Resolved

Prove the absence of undefined behavior for the following safe abstractions:

| Function |
|---------|
|push|
|pop|
|peek_mut|
|PeekMut::deref|
|PeekMut::deref_mut|
|PeekMut::pop|
|PeekMut::refresh|
|Drop for PeekMut|
|rebuild|
|rebuild_tail|
|append|
|into_sorted_vec|
|From<Vec<T>>|
|IntoIterSorted::next|
|DrainSorted::next|
|Drop for Hole|
Comment thread
feliperodri marked this conversation as resolved.
Resolved

The unsafe functions `from_raw_vec` and `as_mut_slice` require callers to keep the contents a max-heap. This is a correctness requirement, not a safety one, so the functions above must be safe even when the contents are not a max-heap.

The verification must be unbounded---it must hold for heaps of arbitrary length.
Comment thread
feliperodri marked this conversation as resolved.
Resolved

The verification must hold for generic type `T` (what satisfies this clause is to be decided in [issue #734](https://github.com/model-checking/verify-rust-std/issues/734)).

The verification must hold for any implementation of `Ord` for `T`, including ones that return inconsistent results.
Comment thread
feliperodri marked this conversation as resolved.
Resolved

### List of UBs

All proofs must automatically ensure the absence of the following undefined behaviors [ref](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/blob/142b2ed77d33f37a9973772bd95e6144ed9dce43/src/behavior-considered-undefined.md):

* Accessing (loading from or storing to) a place that is dangling or based on a misaligned pointer.
* Invoking undefined behavior via compiler intrinsics.
* Reading from uninitialized memory except for padding or unions.
* Producing an invalid value
Comment thread
feliperodri marked this conversation as resolved.
Resolved


Note: All solutions to verification challenges need to satisfy the criteria established in the [challenge book](../general-rules.md)
in addition to the ones listed above.
Loading