Open
Conversation
Replaced Q3FileDialog with QFileDialog for better look&feel on Ubuntu
while editing param type
2. Attribute and operations added through quick edit now appear at
their proper places in main tree view
3. Fixed operation propagation that got broken during previous
releases
2. Duplicate into now duplicates INTO 3. Copying class/artifact will also copy KV table Conflicts: Makefile
Conflicts: Makefile
Compatibilty for debian and opensuse packaging.
New method is simplier and doesn't use Q3PtrListIterator.
Makes code cleaner and nears Qt5 compatibility. 1. foreach used to iterate over lists (except reverse-order iteration); 2. since const T* cannot be attached to QList<T *>, const_cast used in some places; 3. removed "QString warning;" whenever seen.
Q3ptrlist removal
2. Duplicate into now duplicates INTO 3. Copying class/artifact will also copy KV table Conflicts: Makefile Conflicts: Makefile src/CppGenerator/CppRefType.cpp src/CppGenerator/UmlArtifact.cpp src/browser/BrowserNode.cpp src/browser/BrowserPackage.cpp
… operation dialog
iterator increment operator places are corrected #175 fixed
Non latin1 string support is added
in UmlBaseArtifact::addAssociatedClass(UmlClass * cl) adding to QVector was implemmeented wrongly. QHash replaced with QVector in some code, because QHash keys was simply indexes. #175
NULL pointer acccess control inserted to recover #176
Some crash and operation failures recovered during CppReverse and CppRoundTrip
#182 Some class members (eg generalization or extra members like Q_OBJECT)should be placed in the beginning of class definitions. So those members should not be displaced while moving contructors and destructor to up in the class definitions,.
#183 fixed pack->cppNamespace() returns a temp WrapperStr variable. So pointing to its character buffer is wrong.
…false. Some times specifiers mentioned in the title are wrongly added to the operations while CppREversing. Corrected. #185 fixed
Owner
|
Hi, this project is now closed, the official one is http://github.com/DoUML/douml. What is the purpose of this pull request? |
Author
|
I was trying to get all the files so I could build it, but seems that some On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Leonardo Guilherme de Freitas <
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
creating base