Repository navigation
Python: resolve forward references nested in generic aliases when building schemas #14310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
om singhal (Om-singhaI)
wants to merge
10
commits into
microsoft:main
Choose a base branch
from
Om-singhaI:fix/schema-builder-nested-forward-refs
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+285
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
943e551
Python: resolve forward references nested in generic aliases when bui…
Om-singhaI 461de6e
Python: treat an explicit empty namespace as opt in for forward refer…
Om-singhaI 4e850b1
Python: only substitute a forward reference when the name resolves to…
Om-singhaI aa1a276
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/schema-builder-ne…
Om-singhaI 17c1b46
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/schema-builder-ne…
Om-singhaI 4a97a68
Merge branch 'main' into fix/schema-builder-nested-forward-refs
Om-singhaI 5046ebf
Merge branch 'main' into fix/schema-builder-nested-forward-refs
Om-singhaI 4d5bad0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/schema-builder-ne…
Om-singhaI 85cf895
Merge branch 'main' into fix/schema-builder-nested-forward-refs
eavanvalkenburg 5d6fa56
Merge branch 'main' into fix/schema-builder-nested-forward-refs
Om-singhaI File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PEP 604 unions cannot be rebuilt with
origin[resolved_args]: their origin istypes.UnionType, which is not subscriptable. The catch silently restores the unresolved alias. For example,resolve_forward_refs(list[list["Inner"] | None], {"Inner": Inner})still returns the original string-containing annotation. I also reproduced this through a decorated function: its nested nullable-list item schema is only{"type":"object"}, without Inner properties. Please rebuild PEP 604 unions explicitly and add a nested nullable-generic regression, so the forward-reference fix reaches this supported annotation shape too.