Skip to content

Initial topology induced by a family of functions#2003

Open
mkerjean wants to merge 3 commits into
math-comp:masterfrom
mkerjean:initial_fam_topology
Open

Initial topology induced by a family of functions#2003
mkerjean wants to merge 3 commits into
math-comp:masterfrom
mkerjean:initial_fam_topology

Conversation

@mkerjean

@mkerjean mkerjean commented Jun 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Motivation for this change

Enhances initial_topoly.v by constructing the topology induced by a family of functions, instead of a single one.

Checklist
  • added corresponding entries in CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md
  • added corresponding documentation in the headers

Reference: How to document

Merge policy

As a rule of thumb:

  • PRs with several commits that make sense individually and that
    all compile are preferentially merged into master.
  • PRs with disorganized commits are very likely to be squash-rebased.
Reminder to reviewers

@mkerjean mkerjean force-pushed the initial_fam_topology branch from 96364b1 to 47c3e60 Compare July 2, 2026 02:09
@mkerjean

mkerjean commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

The CI is red, and I do not understand why (is it a Nix error ?). Lemma https://github.com/mkerjean/analysis/blob/47c3e604894453fcad960c298b127a3d813c3aed/theories/topology_theory/initial_topology.v#L362 (https://github.com/mkerjean/analysis/blob/47c3e604894453fcad960c298b127a3d813c3aed/theories/topology_theory/initial_topology.v#L362) is said not to compile while the whole library compiles on my computer. Can someone help me understand what's going on? This is a small PR, and I would prefer not to let it gather dust for too long.

@mkerjean mkerjean requested review from affeldt-aist and zstone1 July 2, 2026 02:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant