[WRONG BRANCH] fix(cursor): retain adjacent mid-stream echo diagnostics

[luvs01]

Motivation

• The mid-stream echo observer used a single pending corruptionWatch which could be overwritten by a later marker inside the 512-character corruption window, losing earlier findings and their accumulated corruption evidence.

Description

• Replace the single corruptionWatch with a bounded array corruptionWatches to track multiple concurrent pending watches and preserve up to MAX_MIDSTREAM_FINDINGS findings. (edited src/adapters/cursor/envelope-echo.ts).
• Apply incoming text to every active corruption watch and settle any watches whose window has been filled, pushing their boolean corruption result into recorded and removing the settled watch. (edited src/adapters/cursor/envelope-echo.ts).
• Adjust the findings() path to flush all remaining pending watches before returning recorded findings. (edited src/adapters/cursor/envelope-echo.ts).
• Update and add regression tests that assert closely spaced markers both survive and retain correct offsets and corruption flags. (edited tests/cursor-envelope-echo-retry.test.ts).

Testing

• ✅ Ran the focused suite bun test tests/cursor-envelope-echo-retry.test.ts, and the updated tests passed.
• ✅ Ran bun run typecheck which completed successfully.
• ✅ Ran bun run privacy:scan which completed successfully.
• ⚠️ Ran the full repository test run (bun run test) but it encountered numerous unrelated timeouts and shared-state failures outside the modified Cursor observer code; those failures are existing, unrelated CI-scale issues and were not caused by this focused change.

---

Codex Task

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-08-31T00:49:48.828041Z	87b2ab0	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[github-actions]

✅ Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 37555daa-6b2a-480a-926a-693eff8b0daf

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

⏳ DRAFT

• wrong target branch (main); retarget to dev.

What to do

• Retarget this PR to dev — all contributions go to dev.

Its title has been prefixed with [WRONG BRANCH].
This pull request was already a draft. Its draft status will be preserved after every issue above is resolved.