Summary
SQLSpec can render an EXPLAIN for a statement (SQL.explain()), and it can tell an observer that a statement ran (StatementEvent), but there is no way to get the executed plan and runtime metrics of the statements an application actually runs. DuckDB produces exactly that through its query profiler at no measurable cost; today a consumer has to wire it up by hand around SQLSpec, and cannot do it at all for execute_script.
This proposes an opt-in that captures DuckDB's per-statement profile and surfaces it on the statement event, plus two small related gaps found along the way.
Why explain() does not cover this
|
Executes the statement |
Plan |
Metrics |
explain() |
no |
estimated |
none |
explain(analyze=True) |
yes — replaces the real execution (a CREATE TABLE AS creates its table) |
executed, text |
timing, cardinality |
DuckDB profiler (PRAGMA enable_profiling='json') |
n/a — the statement runs normally |
executed, JSON operator tree |
latency, CPU time, rows scanned, system_peak_buffer_memory, system_peak_temp_dir_size, per-operator timing and cardinality |
Measured on a 2M-row self-join + aggregate CREATE TABLE AS, median of 5 runs: plain 52 ms, profiler enabled 52 ms, EXPLAIN ANALYZE 60 ms. The profiler is the only option that is both free and non-intrusive, and the only one that reports peak memory and spill — the numbers that matter when diagnosing an out-of-memory pipeline.
Current behaviour
import json, tempfile
from pathlib import Path
import duckdb
import sqlspec
from sqlspec import SQL
from sqlspec.adapters.duckdb import DuckDBConfig
from sqlspec.core import StatementConfig
from sqlspec.observability import ObservabilityConfig
print("sqlspec", sqlspec.__version__, "| duckdb", duckdb.__version__)
profile = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp()) / "profile.json"
events = []
def observer(event):
seen = json.loads(profile.read_text())["query_name"].strip()[:40] if profile.exists() else None
events.append({"is_script": event.is_script, "sql": event.sql.strip()[:40], "profile_on_disk_is_for": seen})
config = DuckDBConfig(
connection_config={"database": ":memory:"},
observability_config=ObservabilityConfig(statement_observers=[observer]),
)
with config.provide_session() as session:
session.execute("PRAGMA enable_profiling='json'")
session.execute(f"SET profiling_output='{profile}'")
session.execute("CREATE TABLE a AS SELECT range AS i FROM range(1000)")
session.execute_script("CREATE TABLE b AS SELECT i * 2 AS j FROM a; CREATE TABLE c AS SELECT j + 1 AS k FROM b;")
for e in events[2:]:
print(e)
base = SQL("SELECT 1", statement_config=StatementConfig(dialect="duckdb"))
print(base.explain(analyze=True, format="json").sql)
print(duckdb.connect().execute("EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, FORMAT json) SELECT 1").fetchall()[0][0])
sqlspec 0.64.0 | duckdb 1.5.5
{'is_script': False, 'sql': 'CREATE TABLE a AS SELECT range AS i FROM', 'profile_on_disk_is_for': 'CREATE TABLE a AS SELECT range AS i FROM'}
{'is_script': True, 'sql': 'CREATE TABLE b AS SELECT i * 2 AS j FROM', 'profile_on_disk_is_for': 'CREATE TABLE c AS SELECT j + 1 AS k FROM'}
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT 1
analyzed_plan
What this shows:
- The hand-rolled approach works for single statements. The observer runs synchronously after the statement and before the next one, so the profile on disk belongs to the statement in the event. A consumer can build capture out of public pieces — but has to manage the pragma, a scratch file, parsing, and mismatch guarding themselves.
- It cannot work for scripts.
execute_script splits and runs each statement internally (adapters/duckdb / adapters/adbc/driver.py via split_script_statements) but emits a single event with is_script=True. DuckDB overwrites the profile per statement, so by the time the observer runs only the last statement's profile exists (b in the event, c on disk). The only workaround is for the consumer to stop using execute_script and re-implement the split-and-loop.
explain(analyze=True, format="json") silently drops the format. build_duckdb_explain (sqlspec/builder/_explain.py) returns early on analyze and documents three supported forms, but DuckDB accepts EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, FORMAT json) and returns a JSON analyzed_plan.
Proposal
A. Opt-in statement profiling for DuckDB (native duckdb adapter and ADBC with a DuckDB driver). Shape is a suggestion:
DuckDBConfig(
connection_config={...},
driver_features={"enable_statement_profiling": True}, # or an ObservabilityConfig option
)
When enabled the driver turns the profiler on for each connection it creates, pointing profiling_output at a per-connection scratch file it owns, and after each statement attaches the parsed profile to the event:
class StatementEvent:
...
profile: dict[str, Any] | None # adapter-native executed plan + metrics; None when unavailable
Details that matter:
- Off by default; zero cost when off.
- Per-connection scratch file, cleaned up with the connection, so pooled/concurrent sessions never read each other's profile.
- Verify the profile's
query_name against the statement before attaching it; on mismatch or unreadable file attach None. Capture must never raise into the caller's statement.
- The driver's own setup statements (
PRAGMA enable_profiling, SET profiling_output) should not emit events, or should be marked so observers can skip them.
profile is deliberately adapter-native and optional, which leaves room for other engines later (e.g. PostgreSQL auto_explain, SQLite EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN) without committing to a cross-database plan schema now.
B. Per-statement events from execute_script. Emit one StatementEvent per split statement (each carrying its own profile when A is enabled), with something like script_ordinal / script_statement_count so an observer can reassemble the script. Keeping the existing whole-script event as well is fine; the missing piece is the per-statement granularity. This is useful independently of profiling — per-statement duration and row counts for scripts are unobservable today.
C. DuckDB analyze + format. Have build_duckdb_explain render EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, FORMAT JSON) <stmt> when both are requested, instead of dropping format.
A and B together are the feature; C is a small independent fix and can be split into its own issue if that is tidier.
Environment
- sqlspec 0.64.0 (same code on
main at the time of writing)
- duckdb 1.5.5
- Python 3.12, Linux
Summary
SQLSpec can render an
EXPLAINfor a statement (SQL.explain()), and it can tell an observer that a statement ran (StatementEvent), but there is no way to get the executed plan and runtime metrics of the statements an application actually runs. DuckDB produces exactly that through its query profiler at no measurable cost; today a consumer has to wire it up by hand around SQLSpec, and cannot do it at all forexecute_script.This proposes an opt-in that captures DuckDB's per-statement profile and surfaces it on the statement event, plus two small related gaps found along the way.
Why
explain()does not cover thisexplain()explain(analyze=True)CREATE TABLE AScreates its table)PRAGMA enable_profiling='json')system_peak_buffer_memory,system_peak_temp_dir_size, per-operator timing and cardinalityMeasured on a 2M-row self-join + aggregate
CREATE TABLE AS, median of 5 runs: plain 52 ms, profiler enabled 52 ms,EXPLAIN ANALYZE60 ms. The profiler is the only option that is both free and non-intrusive, and the only one that reports peak memory and spill — the numbers that matter when diagnosing an out-of-memory pipeline.Current behaviour
What this shows:
execute_scriptsplits and runs each statement internally (adapters/duckdb/adapters/adbc/driver.pyviasplit_script_statements) but emits a single event withis_script=True. DuckDB overwrites the profile per statement, so by the time the observer runs only the last statement's profile exists (bin the event,con disk). The only workaround is for the consumer to stop usingexecute_scriptand re-implement the split-and-loop.explain(analyze=True, format="json")silently drops the format.build_duckdb_explain(sqlspec/builder/_explain.py) returns early onanalyzeand documents three supported forms, but DuckDB acceptsEXPLAIN (ANALYZE, FORMAT json)and returns a JSONanalyzed_plan.Proposal
A. Opt-in statement profiling for DuckDB (native
duckdbadapter and ADBC with a DuckDB driver). Shape is a suggestion:When enabled the driver turns the profiler on for each connection it creates, pointing
profiling_outputat a per-connection scratch file it owns, and after each statement attaches the parsed profile to the event:Details that matter:
query_nameagainst the statement before attaching it; on mismatch or unreadable file attachNone. Capture must never raise into the caller's statement.PRAGMA enable_profiling,SET profiling_output) should not emit events, or should be marked so observers can skip them.profileis deliberately adapter-native and optional, which leaves room for other engines later (e.g. PostgreSQLauto_explain, SQLiteEXPLAIN QUERY PLAN) without committing to a cross-database plan schema now.B. Per-statement events from
execute_script. Emit oneStatementEventper split statement (each carrying its ownprofilewhen A is enabled), with something likescript_ordinal/script_statement_countso an observer can reassemble the script. Keeping the existing whole-script event as well is fine; the missing piece is the per-statement granularity. This is useful independently of profiling — per-statement duration and row counts for scripts are unobservable today.C. DuckDB
analyze+format. Havebuild_duckdb_explainrenderEXPLAIN (ANALYZE, FORMAT JSON) <stmt>when both are requested, instead of droppingformat.A and B together are the feature; C is a small independent fix and can be split into its own issue if that is tidier.
Environment
mainat the time of writing)